· Community foundation
First Look for Charity Foundation
The FIRST LOOK FOR CHARITY FOUNDATION is organized to operate exclusively for charitable, cultural, and educational purposes.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k3 grants · $103k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.6M
- $250k+1 grant · $443k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MISERICORDIA | $443,286 |
| FRANCISCAN COMMUNITY BENEFIT SERVICES | $171,461 |
| ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO FOUNDATION | $162,220 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $155,925 |
| SERTOMA STAR SERVICES | $137,234 |
| ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE | $115,998 |
| TURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION | $115,333 |
| 100 CLUB OF CHICAGO | $109,084 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS | $107,230 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO | $103,708 |
| LYDIA HOME ASSOCIATION | $103,498 |
| CAL'S ANGELS | $102,668 |
| ALS ASSOCIATION | $102,264 |
| JESSE WHITE TUMBLING TEAM | $72,027 |
| SUSAN G KOMEN - CHICAGO | $65,920 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MHMISERICORDIA HOME8× · 2017–2025 · $3.2M · revenue +76%
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Foundation5× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +7%- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO8× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +39%
Funded once
- RGRAY GRAHAM ASSOCIATION FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIESone grant, 2017 · $105k · revenue +24%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…
Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
We are dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for the northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a leader in: -pediatric health care delivery…
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
Founded in 1883, brightpoint (formerly known as children's home & aid) is a leading statewide organization supporting families so children can thrive.
We, mercy health system of chicago and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mercy foundation is a member of mercy health system of chicago…
We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…
Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."
Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite and empower the promise of youth. we nurture children, strengthen communities and believe that inherent in every child is the ability to succeed and thrive in life.
The elmhurst memorial healthcare group follows the mission of endeavor health (f/k/a ns-ee holdings). the mission of endeavor health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." central to this mission is a commitment to…
The mission of mchc chicago hospital council is to foster, promote, support, develop and encourage charitable, educational, scholastic and scientific purposes; promote cooperative effort and action between hospitals and other health care…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 59 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
- Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Foundation ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds Franciscan Community Benefit Services ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE 100 CLUB OF ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds JESSE WHITE TUMBLING TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF JOLIET ↗
- Who funds CHICAGOLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY JAMES HARRIS TREASURER ↗
- Who funds SERTOMA STAR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LYDIA HOME ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CLEARBROOK ↗
- Who funds The Cradle Society ↗
- Who funds ALS UNITED GREATER CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
- Who funds FIRST LOOK FOR CHARITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds GLENWOOD ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CAL'S ALL-STAR ANGEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RAY GRAHAM ASSOCIATION FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BLOOMINGTON-NORMAL ↗
- Who funds VIOLET FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC BRAIN CA ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Baird Foundation Inc · The Coleman Foundation Inc · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Dupage Community Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization First Look for Charity Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.