Skip to content

· Private foundation

Find a Way Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$42kHuman Services$21kHealth$16kInternational$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kPhilanthropy$4kEducation$3kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$900
Median grant
2
States reached
$18k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,950
KENYA KEYS$900
Individual grant recipient$307
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHARITY WATER: $700 → 17%RODS HEROES: $3k → 12%ONE HEART BULGARIA: $500 → 12%THE ROAD HOME: $295 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
NY
OR
PA
CA
UT
AZ
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45k · 12 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +137% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
40

Total granted

$45k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+137%
-9%

Still filing today

33%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • G
    GOFUNDMEORG
    3× · 2019–2022 · $3k · revenue +719%
  • DF
    Days For Girls International
    3× · 2017–2022 · $3k · revenue +137%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    2× · 2017–2018 · $500 · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • NN
    NAVAJO NATION
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Health Foundation

Support and Research Major Problems in Child Health Globally

International
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
Global Strategies

Global Strategies empowers communities in the most neglected areas of the world to improve the lives of women and children through healthcare.

Health
4
Mary's Meals Usa Inc

To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…

International
5
Pul Alliance for Digital Health and Equity Inc

According to the World Health Organization, half of the worlds 8 billion people still cannot access essential health services. Even for those who can, the costs are often cripplingly high. NGOs delivering health and humanitarian aid to…

Community Improvement
6
Land O'lakes VENTURE37

To replace poverty with prosperity by implementing donor-funded projects that provide global humanitarian aid to communities and individuals in developing countries through in-kind, financial and technical assistance.

International
7
Kimberly-Clark Foundation
Education
8
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
9
Strides for Africa Inc

Exposed to the water crisis in rural Africa during the adoption of a child, we initiate action through educational outreach and events that fund sustainable clean water sources or projects providing educational/health benefits for rural…

Public Benefit
10
Doctors to the World

Medical care and education to under-served communities around the world.

—
11
A Is for Africa Ltd

A is for Africa is an educational foundation focusing education and health among the Maasai people of Tanzania East Africa. Our primary work involves providing educational support to the local government schools in the way of a school…

International
12
The Human Development Foundation of North America

To facilitate a Non-Political Movement for Positive Social Change and Community Empowerment through Mass Literacy, Enhanced Quality of Education,Universal Primary Healthcare and Grassroots Economic Development.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Heart Bulgaria Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Charity Global Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOUNTIFUL FOOD PANTRY: $23,466 · OtherBOUNTIFUL FOOD PANTRYNAVAJO NATION: $9,411 · OtherNAVAJO NATIONIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,985 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDAVIS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $4,750 · OtherWALMART: $4,173 · OtherJOHNSON FAMILY: $4,000 · OtherDAVIS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $3,240 · Other+36 more: $31,372 · Other+36 moreRODS HEROES INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $700 · Human ServicesONE HEART BULGARIA CORPORATION: $500 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD HOME: $295 · Human ServicesDays For Girls International: $2,500 · InternationalTINY TIMS FOUNDATION FOR KIDS: $1,200 · InternationalGOFUNDMEORG: $3,150 · PhilanthropyChasing Ms Foundation Inc: $200 · PhilanthropyKENYA KEYS: $1,800 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $500 · HealthBEAR LAKE VALLEY HEALTH CARE FOUNDA: $500 · Health
Other$93,397Human Services$3,995International$3,700Philanthropy$3,350Education$1,800Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $3,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRODS HEROES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDays For Girls International: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKENYA KEYS: $1,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTINY TIMS FOUNDATION FOR KIDS: $1,200 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE HEART BULGARIA CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEAR LAKE VALLEY HEALTH CARE FOUNDA: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $295 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChasing Ms Foundation Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDavis Education Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds RODS HEROES INC ↗
  • Who funds Days For Girls International ↗
  • Who funds KENYA KEYS ↗
  • Who funds TINY TIMS FOUNDATION FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE HEART BULGARIA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds BEAR LAKE VALLEY HEALTH CARE FOUNDA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Find a Way Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Find a Way Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Find a Way Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Find a Way Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Find a Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph