Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Find a Way Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Food & Nutrition$42kHuman Services$21kHealth$16kInternational$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kPhilanthropy$4kEducation$3kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$900
Median grant
2
States reached
$18k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,950
KENYA KEYS$900
Individual grant recipient$307
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHARITY WATER: $700 → 17%RODS HEROES: $3k → 12%ONE HEART BULGARIA: $500 → 12%THE ROAD HOME: $295 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
NY
OR
PA
CA
UT
AZ

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$45k · 12 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +137% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
40

Total granted

$45k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+137%
+5%

Still filing today

33%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • G
    GOFUNDMEORG
    3× · 2019–2022 · $3k · revenue +719%
  • DF
    Days For Girls International
    3× · 2017–2022 · $3k · revenue +137%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    2× · 2017–2018 · $500 · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • NN
    NAVAJO NATION
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Health Foundation

Support and Research Major Problems in Child Health Globally

International
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
Global Strategies

Global Strategies empowers communities in the most neglected areas of the world to improve the lives of women and children through healthcare.

Health
4
Mary's Meals Usa Inc

To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…

International
5
Pul Alliance for Digital Health and Equity Inc

According to the World Health Organization, half of the worlds 8 billion people still cannot access essential health services. Even for those who can, the costs are often cripplingly high. NGOs delivering health and humanitarian aid to…

Community Improvement
6
Land O'lakes VENTURE37

To replace poverty with prosperity by implementing donor-funded projects that provide global humanitarian aid to communities and individuals in developing countries through in-kind, financial and technical assistance.

International
7
Kimberly-Clark Foundation
Education
8
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
9
Strides for Africa Inc

Exposed to the water crisis in rural Africa during the adoption of a child, we initiate action through educational outreach and events that fund sustainable clean water sources or projects providing educational/health benefits for rural…

Public Benefit
10
Doctors to the World

Medical care and education to under-served communities around the world.

11
A Is for Africa Ltd

A is for Africa is an educational foundation focusing education and health among the Maasai people of Tanzania East Africa. Our primary work involves providing educational support to the local government schools in the way of a school…

International
12
The Human Development Foundation of North America

To facilitate a Non-Political Movement for Positive Social Change and Community Empowerment through Mass Literacy, Enhanced Quality of Education,Universal Primary Healthcare and Grassroots Economic Development.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Heart Bulgaria Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Charity Global Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOUNTIFUL FOOD PANTRY — $23,466 · OtherBOUNTIFUL FOOD PANTRYNAVAJO NATION — $9,411 · OtherNAVAJO NATIONIndividual grant recipient — $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $5,985 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDAVIS SCHOOL DISTRICT — $4,750 · OtherWALMART — $4,173 · OtherJOHNSON FAMILY — $4,000 · OtherDAVIS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT — $3,240 · Other+36 more — $31,372 · Other+36 moreRODS HEROES INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC — $700 · Human ServicesONE HEART BULGARIA CORPORATION — $500 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD HOME — $295 · Human ServicesDays For Girls International — $2,500 · InternationalTINY TIMS FOUNDATION FOR KIDS — $1,200 · InternationalGOFUNDMEORG — $3,150 · PhilanthropyChasing Ms Foundation Inc — $200 · PhilanthropyKENYA KEYS — $1,800 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $500 · HealthBEAR LAKE VALLEY HEALTH CARE FOUNDA — $500 · Health
Other$93,397Human Services$3,995International$3,700Philanthropy$3,350Education$1,800Health$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGOFUNDMEORG — $3,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDays For Girls International — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRODS HEROES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKENYA KEYS — $1,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTINY TIMS FOUNDATION FOR KIDS — $1,200 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC — $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE HEART BULGARIA CORPORATION — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEAR LAKE VALLEY HEALTH CARE FOUNDA — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME — $295 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChasing Ms Foundation Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDavis Education Foundation — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590 — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG
  • Who funds Days For Girls International
  • Who funds RODS HEROES INC
  • Who funds KENYA KEYS
  • Who funds TINY TIMS FOUNDATION FOR KIDS
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC
  • Who funds ONE HEART BULGARIA CORPORATION
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds BEAR LAKE VALLEY HEALTH CARE FOUNDA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Find a Way Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Find a Way Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Find a Way Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph