Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fgp Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$71kReligion$52kHuman Services$17kRecreation & Sports$15kPhilanthropy$13kYouth Development$11kArts & Culture$11kAnimals$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$5,000
ST RAYMOND OF PENAFORT$5,000
ST LUKE LUTHERAN CHURCH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,400
CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION$2,000
PROVIDENCE ANIMAL CENTER$2,000
WXPN$2,000
ST FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS$2,000
LUTHERAN SETTLEMENT HOUSE$2,000
VALLEY FORGE PARK ALLIANCE$2,000
BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY MUSEUM OF AR$2,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE$2,000
CARDINAL FOLEY FALL CLASSIC$1,420
ANGEL'S RETREAT$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROJECT SWEET PEAS: $250 → 7%ST FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 8%ST FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 8%ST FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 8%ST FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 8%MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
IL
MA
WY
PA
RI
CA
UT
VA
DE
AZ
DC
OK
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$194k · 18 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
26

Total granted

$194k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+24%

Still filing today

44%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsHealthCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +23%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $9k · revenue +54%
  • DC
    DELAWARE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MOFFET
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • TJ
    THE JAY SIGEL INVITATIONAL
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • Feeding America
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Scholarship Fund Philadelphia

With over 20 years of experience and over 30,000 scholarships awarded, csfp provides philadelphia children with eight-year, needs-based scholarships to attend safe, quality, k-8th grade schools. continued on schedule o.supporting…

Education
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
5
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
6
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

7
Children First Pa

Summary

Human Services
8
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
11
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
12
Lupus Foundation of America Philadelphia Tri-State Chapter

Supports lupus research related to the diagnosis, treatment and the ultimate goal of finding a cure for lupus

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Miracle Network and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Moffet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionLand Conservation Organizat…Youth Development CentersChristian Youth CampsFood Pantries & AssistanceVeteran Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%12%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr15%16%35–55yr17%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr19%32%10–20yr17%21%20–35yr15%5%35–55yr17%39%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/30
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,132

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST LUKE LUTHERAN CHURCH — $45,000 · OtherST LUKE LUTHERAN CHURCHEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $16,000 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $15,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY MUSEUM OF AR — $11,000 · OtherBRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY MUSEUM OF ARLUTHERAN SETTLEMENT HOUSE — $9,500 · OtherLUTHERAN SETTLEMENT HOUSEBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC — $9,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INCJ WOOD PLATT CADDIE SCHOLARSHIP TRUST — $8,500 · OtherThe Friends of Valley Forge Valley Forge Park Alliance — $6,000 · OtherCARDINAL FOLEY FALL CLASSIC — $5,782 · Other+27 more — $40,595 · Other+27 moreCRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL — $30,000 · EducationCRISTO REY PHILADEL…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $11,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNI…+1 more — $500 · EducationDELAWARE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $9,000 · AnimalsANGELS RETREAT — $1,000 · AnimalsSAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS — $7,000 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT — $1,000 · Human Services+1 more — $250 · Human ServicesTHE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF MOFFET — $2,586 · Community ImprovementTHE WATERWHEEL FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$166,977Education$41,500Animals$10,000Human Services$8,250Environment$7,000Community Improvement$2,586Philanthropy$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC — $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJ WOOD PLATT CADDIE SCHOLARSHIP TRUST — $8,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS — $7,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Friends of Valley Forge Valley Forge Park Alliance — $6,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE WATERWHEEL FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDING FORWARD (FORMERLY THE UNION LEAGUE LEGACY FOUNDATION) — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND CHANCE MINISTRIES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS RETREAT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBerwyn-Paoli Area Little League Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION — $445 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Sweet Peas — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY LIVES ON FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC
  • Who funds DELAWARE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds J WOOD PLATT CADDIE SCHOLARSHIP TRUST
  • Who funds THE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS
  • Who funds The Friends of Valley Forge Valley Forge Park Alliance
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MOFFET
  • Who funds THE WATERWHEEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds FOUNDING FORWARD (FORMERLY THE UNION LEAGUE LEGACY FOUNDATION)
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE MINISTRIES
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK
  • Who funds ANGELS RETREAT
  • Who funds Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN
  • Who funds LAYMEN'S RETREAT LEAGUE
  • Who funds Berwyn-Paoli Area Little League Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka Blbb CharitableDE15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka Blbb Charitable · Connelly Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fgp Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 33%
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Delaware Inc33% of income from government
  • The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc16% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fgp Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fgp Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph