Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fertig Freedom Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$120kYouth Development$51kEducation$45kArts & Culture$37kInternational$37kAnimals$28kPhilanthropy$24kCrime & Legal$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$682k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MDS SOCIETY$10,000
FRIEND TO FRIEND SHOP AT MT ZION UCSF$6,000
SEVA FOUNDATION$6,000
K9S FOR WARRIORS$6,000
RUNNING STRONG FOR AMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH$5,000
LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION LAAVA$5,000
BENJAMIN CANCER CENTER$5,000
GUITARS NOT GUNS$5,000
COMMON ROOTS FARM$5,000
LA COMIDA DE CALIFORNIA$4,000
GREEN BRONX MACHINE$4,000
LAST PRISONER PROJECT$4,000
MUSIC & MEMORY$4,000
LONG ISLAND CARES -HARRY CHAPIN FOOD$4,000
PROJECT NICU$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEW GROUND: $3k → 6%RUNNING STRONG FOR AMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH: $5k → 6%AL OTRO LADO: $3k → 14%NEW GROUND: $3k → 6%NEW GROUND: $3k → 6%RUNNING STRONG FOR AMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH: $5k → 6%NEW GROUND: $3k → 6%NEW GROUND: $3k → 6%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $4k → 7%NEW GROUND: $2k → 6%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $4k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$456k · 30 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against -28% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
11

Total granted

$456k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-28%

Still filing today

60%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationAnimalsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $32k · revenue +87%
  • GN
    GUITARS NOT GUNS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +255%
  • CR
    COMMON ROOTS FARM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES TRADE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -72%
  • NL
    NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue -70%
  • AO
    AL OTRO LADOgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +218%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Legal Services Nyc

Legal services nyc is a non-profit organization that provides free civil legal assistance to low-income people in new york city. a community-based organization serving more than 100,000 people annually, lsnyc is the nation's largest…

Crime & Legal
2
New York University School of Law Foundation

The foundation, a subsidiary of new york university, fosters legal education and research at new york university's school of law by awarding scholarships, making grants for educational purposes related to law, and supporting programs of…

Education
3
California State University Long Beach Research Foundation

Serves the mission of the university by supporting and engaging in research, entrepreneurship, community service, sponsored programs and the acquisition of private resources.

Education
4
California Western School of Law

California western school of law is an independent, aba/aals and wasc senior college and university commission (wscuc) accredited s.d. law school that prepares graduates for the practice of law through a carefully sequenced program of…

Education
5
Brooklyn Legal Services Inc

Brooklyn legal services, inc is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purpose of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york city area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.

Crime & Legal
6
Lsny-Bronx Corporation

Legal services nyc-bronx is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purposes of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york city area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.

Education
7
Legal Services of Greater Miami Inc

To advance economic opportunity and social justice through legal advocacy.

Crime & Legal
8
Legal Services of Northern California

To empower the poor to identify and defeat the causes and effects of poverty within their communities by providing high quality civil legal services to the poor, seniors, and persons with disabilities in over twenty three counties in n.…

Crime & Legal
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Long Island University

To provide excellence and access in private higher education to those who seek to expand their knowledge and prepare themselves for meaningful, educated lives and for service to their communities and the world.

—
11
Legal Aid of Marin

To provide access to the civil justice system through quality legal services, encompassing practical solutions, to low income, vulnerable and otherwise underserved residents of marin county.

Crime & Legal
12
National Lawyers Guild Inc

Unites lawyers and other related parties in an organization which functions as an effective political and social force in the service of the people

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Services Unlimited Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Nicu. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
16/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY: $25,000 · OtherCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITYMUSIC & MEMORY INC: $21,000 · OtherMUSIC & MEMORY INCMDS SOCIETY: $20,000 · OtherMDS SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIEND TO FRIEND SHOP AT MT ZION UCSF: $12,000 · OtherFRIEND TO FRIEND AT MOUNT ZION UCSF: $12,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES TRADE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherBENJAMIN CANCER CENTER: $10,000 · OtherLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION LAAVA: $10,000 · OtherLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION: $19,000 · OtherLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATIONTHE MOCKINGBIRD FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherCOMMON ROOTS FARM: $20,000 · OtherCOMMON ROOTS FARMLAST PRISONER PROJECT: $9,000 · Other+15 more: $67,500 · Other+15 moreTHE MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES FOUNDATION: $49,500 · HealthTHE MYELODYS…DO IT FOR JAMES FOUNDATION: $6,000 · HealthDO IT FOR JA…PROJECT NICU: $4,000 · HealthPROJECT NICUGUITARS NOT GUNS INC: $26,000 · Youth DevelopmentGUITARS NOT…GREEN BRONX MACHINE INTERNATIONAL INC: $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentGREEN BRONX…CAMP GOOD MOURNING INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP GOOD M…UCLA FOUNDATION: $34,500 · EducationUCLA FOUNDA…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $18,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …THE GUILD LAW SCHOOL PEOPLES COLLEGE OF LAW: $2,000 · EducationSEVA FOUNDATION: $40,500 · InternationalNew Ground Inc: $17,000 · Human ServicesLong Island Cares Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH RUNNING STRONG INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesAL OTRO LADO: $3,000 · Human ServicesK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $32,000 · AnimalsDogs on Deployment: $1,500 · Animals
Other$259,500Health$59,500Youth Development$57,000Education$54,500International$40,500Human Services$40,000Animals$33,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES FOUNDATION: $49,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSEVA FOUNDATION: $40,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $34,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $32,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGUITARS NOT GUNS INC: $26,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetMUSIC & MEMORY INC: $21,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMON ROOTS FARM: $20,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew Ground Inc: $17,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGREEN BRONX MACHINE INTERNATIONAL INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCAMP GOOD MOURNING INC: $15,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetTHE MOCKINGBIRD FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetLOS ANGELES TRADE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLong Island Cares Inc: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH RUNNING STRONG INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAST PRISONER PROJECT: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLA COMIDA DE CALIFORNIA: $8,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDO IT FOR JAMES FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCANGRESS DBA LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetURBAN PATHWAYS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT NICU: $4,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAL OTRO LADO: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES UNLIMITED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDogs on Deployment: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLet's Work for Good Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEVA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds GUITARS NOT GUNS INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC & MEMORY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON ROOTS FARM ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds New Ground Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREEN BRONX MACHINE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP GOOD MOURNING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MOCKINGBIRD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES TRADE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Long Island Cares Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH RUNNING STRONG INC ↗
  • Who funds LAST PRISONER PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds LA COMIDA DE CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds DO IT FOR JAMES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANGRESS DBA LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds URBAN PATHWAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT NICU ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AL OTRO LADO ↗
  • Who funds THE GUILD LAW SCHOOL PEOPLES COLLEGE OF LAW ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES UNLIMITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC12.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fertig Freedom Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fertig Freedom Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fertig Freedom Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fertig Freedom Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fertig Freedom’s filings →

More from the funding graph