Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Feller Family Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$346k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0166% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$338kFood & Nutrition$196kPhilanthropy$72kHousing & Shelter$58kHealth$41kArts & Culture$27kEnvironment$16kEducation$14kInternational$6kOther$409k
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k29 grants · $100k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $89k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $157k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES$56,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE$51,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
LONG DISTANCE EDUCATIONAL MEDIA NPF$25,000
EFAC$20,000
GREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY RESTORE$12,000
ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK OF NEW MEXICO$12,000
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK$10,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA$10,000
LA PLATA OPEN SPACE CONSERVANCY$7,000
DURANGO FOOD BANK$7,000
RAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION$7,000
CARE AND SHARE FOOD BANK$7,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$7,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $271k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $3k → 7%THE FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%RAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $10k → 6%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $3k → 7%RAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION: $9k → 12%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $10k → 6%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $2k → 7%RAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $2k → 7%RAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $2k → 7%RAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $2k → 7%RAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $2k → 7%RAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION: $4k → 12%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $8k → 7%RAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION: $4k → 12%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $8k → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $13k → 14%RAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION: $4k → 12%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $5k → 7%CUIDANDO LOS NINOS: $4k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 14%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $5k → 7%STEELBRIDGE MINISTRIES: $4k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $3k → 7%STEELBRIDGE MINISTRIES: $4k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%STEELBRIDGE MINISTRIES: $4k → 14%CUIDANDO LOS NINOS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%CUIDANDO LOS NINOS: $3k → 14%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $56k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $3k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $3k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $2k → 7%MARGEURITES PLACE: $5k → 7%MARGEURITES PLACE: $5k → 7%MARGARITE'S PLACE: $3k → 7%MARGARITE'S PLACE: $3k → 7%MARGEURITES PLACE: $3k → 7%MARGEURITES PLACE: $3k → 7%MARGEURITES PLACE: $3k → 7%MARGARITE'S PLACE: $2k → 7%MARGARITE'S PLACE: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
CA
CO
KY
MD
NM
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$969k · 46 repeat orgs$208k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
35

Total granted

$969k
$124k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+29%

Still filing today

74%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    New Hampshire Catholic Charities
    9× · 2017–2025 · $97k · revenue +25%
  • RF
    ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $72k · revenue +52%
  • RO
    RAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • SI
    ST ISABEL CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • LL
    LSPA LIGHTHOUSE FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • TM
    THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +44%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
4
Montana Food Bank Network Inc

Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…

Food & Nutrition
5
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
6
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
7
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
8
Vermont Foodbank

To gather and share quality food and nurture partnerships so that no one in vermont will go hungry.

Food & Nutrition
9
Greater Boston Food Bank Inc

Our costs consist of acquiring, sorting and distributing food to 617 member agencies, transportation and logistics, and community outreach to 69 direct distribution sites such as gbfb mobile markets, and federal distributions for low…

—
10
Feeding Westchester Inc

Driven by the belief that access to healthy food is a basic right for all people, feeding westchester leads hunger action programs and mobilizes the resources needed to eradicate hunger in westchester county.

—
11
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
12
Waste Not Inc

Waste Not cultivates sustainable food systems that help people and the planet flourish. We do this by eliminating food waste and hunger through innovative community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Share Outreach Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gosnold Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Construc…Senior Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Health Access Advocacy and …Environmental Conservation …Community Arts CentersPolicy Research and AdvocacyAnimal Rescue and ShelterFood Banks and PantriesUnited Way AffiliatesElementary Literacy TutoringLocal Food System Organizat…Cancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr16%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%36%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/55
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,510

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/54
Grantees still filing
38/54
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEFAC — $35,000 · OtherEFACST THOMAS MORE COLLEGE — $35,000 · OtherST THOMAS MORE COLLEGEMANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHEN — $34,750 · OtherMANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHENNAVAJO WATER PROJECT — $27,000 · OtherNAVAJO WATER PROJECTBERKSHIRE UNITED WAY INC — $24,000 · OtherBERKSHIRE UNITED WAY INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $20,500 · OtherFOOD DEPOT OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS — $20,000 · OtherGOSNOLD INC — $15,500 · Other+44 more — $183,000 · Other+44 moreNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $97,000 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic CharitiesFamily Promise of Southern New Hampshire — $67,000 · Human ServicesFamily Promise of Southern New H…RAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION — $55,500 · Human ServicesRAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATIONMARGUERITE'S PLACE INC — $27,500 · Human ServicesMARGUERITE'S PLACE INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & It…BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INCCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $16,500 · Human ServicesSTEELBRIDGE MINISTRIES FKA ALBUQUERQUE RESCUE MISSION — $12,000 · Human Services+3 more — $17,000 · Human ServicesROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC — $72,000 · Food & NutritionROADRUNNER FOOD BA…Care and Share Inc — $46,500 · Food & NutritionCare and Share IncDURANGO FOOD BANK — $25,750 · Food & NutritionDURANGO FOOD BANKCOMMUNITY HARVEST PROJECT INC — $17,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY HARVEST …SHARE OUTREACH INC — $15,000 · Food & NutritionSHARE OUTREACH INCTHE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more — $9,500 · Food & NutritionUNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC — $50,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF TRI COUNTY INC — $15,000 · PhilanthropyDICK COTTER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,250 · PhilanthropyGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $41,500 · Housing & ShelterSARANAM LLC — $8,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING SOLUTIONS FOR THE SOUTHWEST — $7,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $1,500 · Housing & ShelterAmerican Heart Association Inc — $21,250 · HealthTHE STATION FOUNDATION — $15,000 · HealthCASA ESPERANZA INC — $3,000 · HealthCALVARY FUND INC — $2,000 · HealthLONG DISTANCE EDUCATIONAL MEDIA NPF — $25,000 · Arts & Culture516 Arts — $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$444,750Human Services$338,000Food & Nutrition$195,750Philanthropy$71,750Housing & Shelter$58,000Health$41,250Arts & Culture$27,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $97,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC — $72,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Promise of Southern New Hampshire — $67,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetRAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION — $55,500 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC — $50,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCare and Share Inc — $46,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $41,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHEN — $34,750 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMARGUERITE'S PLACE INC — $27,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetDURANGO FOOD BANK — $25,750 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBERKSHIRE UNITED WAY INC — $24,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $21,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HARVEST PROJECT INC — $17,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $16,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGOSNOLD INC — $15,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUTREACH INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TRI COUNTY INC — $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STATION FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSTEELBRIDGE MINISTRIES FKA ALBUQUERQUE RESCUE MISSION — $12,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSARANAM LLC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSING SOLUTIONS FOR THE SOUTHWEST — $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDICK COTTER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN - DC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHRIVE DC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEthos Literacy — $4,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBERKSHIRE GROWN INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCASA ESPERANZA INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIDA SENIOR CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBERKSHIRE COUNTY KIDS' PLACE AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW MEXICO BIOPARK SOCIETY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget516 Arts — $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCALVARY FUND INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNASHUA CHILDREN'S HOME — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC — $1,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Livestrong Foundation — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERKSHIRE FOOD PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
  • Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Promise of Southern New Hampshire ↗
  • Who funds RAY OF HOPE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC ↗
  • Who funds Care and Share Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds MANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds MARGUERITE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds DURANGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds LONG DISTANCE EDUCATIONAL MEDIA NPF ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HARVEST PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds GOSNOLD INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF TRI COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEELBRIDGE MINISTRIES FKA ALBUQUERQUE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds SARANAM LLC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING SOLUTIONS FOR THE SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds La Plata Open Space Conservancy ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank Foundati…Eversource Energy Fou…Albuquerque Community…Pnm Tnmp FoundationNusenda FoundationNew Hampshire Charita…Agnes M Lindsay TrustBob & Lamee Holscher …The Barker Foundation…Ann de Nicola TuwM L Billings Tr FBO N…Texas Instruments Fou…
Eastern Bank FoundationMA23.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Bob & Lamee Holscher Charitable Nka · The Barker Foundation Inc · Ann de Nicola Tuw · M L Billings Tr FBO Nh Charities · Texas Instruments Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Feller Family Charitable Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Casa Esperanza Inc — 59% of income from government
  • Berkshire Grown Inc — 28% of income from government
  • United Way of Tri County Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Community Harvest Project Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Gosnold Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines