Skip to content
Feingold Family Charitable Fdn at a glance

· Private foundation

Feingold Family Charitable Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$94kEducation$67kRecreation & Sports$10kArts & Culture$7kPhilanthropy$5kCivil Rights$4kCommunity Improvement$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$332k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Y NOT SAVE A SAM RESCUE$20,000
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
ASSET BUILDERS OF AMERICA INC$5,000
AMAZING GRACE EQUINE SANCTUARY INC$3,500
PLAYING AGAIN SAMS OF WISCONSIN$2,500
AAUW WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC$2,000
LIONS TIGERS AND BEARS$1,500
VISION TO LEARN$1,000
CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE INC: $1k → 10%CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%LIONS TIGERS AND BEARS: $2k → 11%PALM SPRINGS PLAZA THEATRE FDN: $3k → 11%CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3k → 14%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $1k → 18%AAUW WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 7%SHEBOYGAN SOUTH HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 9%ASSET BUILDERS OF AMERICA INC: $5k → 10%ECONOMICS WISCONSIN: $1k → 17%Y NOT SAVE A SAM RESCUE: $20k → 12%NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $1k → 6%CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%LIONS TIGERS BEARS: $2k → 11%VISION TO LEARN: $1k → 14%AAUW WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 7%UW-SHEBOYGAN COUNTY FDN INC: $2k → 9%ASSET BUILDERS OF AMERICA INC: $5k → 10%ECONOMICS WISCONSIN: $1k → 17%Y NOT SAVE A SAM RESCUE: $13k → 12%CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%LIONS TIGERS BEARS: $1k → 11%AAUW WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 7%UW-SHEBOYGAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%PLAYING AGAIN SAMS OF WISCONSIN: $3k → 10%Y NOT SAVE A SAM RESCUE: $6k → 12%CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%LIONS TIGERS & BEARS: $1k → 11%UW-SHEBOYGAN COUNTY FDN INC: $1k → 9%PLAYING AGAIN SAMS OF WISCONSIN: $3k → 10%Y-NOT SAVE A SAM RESCUE: $5k → 12%CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%AMAZING GRACE EQUINE SANCTUARY: $4k → 9%PLAYING AGAIN SAMS OF WISCONSIN: $3k → 10%Y-NOT SAVE A SAM RESCUE: $2k → 12%K9 CONNECTION PET REHOMING AND ADOPTION: $2k → 11%AMAZING GRACE EQUINE SANCTUARY INC: $4k → 9%ASSET BUILDERS OF AMERICA INC: $2k → 10%Y-NOT SAVE A SAM RESCUE: $2k → 12%AMAZING GRACE EQUINE SANCTUARY: $4k → 9%PLAYING AGAIN SAMS OF WISCONSIN: $2k → 10%Y-NOT SAVE A SAM RESCUE: $2k → 12%AMAZING GRACE EQUINE SANCTUARY INC: $4k → 9%AMAZING GRACE EQUINE SANCTUARY: $4k → 9%AMAZING GRACE EQUINE SANCTUARY INC: $4k → 9%AMAZING GRACE EQUINE SANCTUARY INC: $4k → 9%SHEBOYGAN NORTH HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$176k · 15 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$176k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+28%

Still filing today

53%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationInternationalRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YS
    Y-NOT SAVE A SAM RESCUE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $48k · revenue +28%
  • AB
    ASSET BUILDERS OF AMERICA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $13k · revenue +28%
  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $6k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • PS
    Palm Springs Plaza Theatre Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -41%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • KC
    K9 Connection Pet Re Homing and Adoption Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Spcala is dedicated to the prevention of cruelty to animals through education, law enforcement, intervention and advocacy.

Animals
2
The California Wildlife Center

The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…

Health
3
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
4
Lange Foundation

Our mission is to rescue pets that have been impounded at los angeles county's 25 overcrowded public shelters - providing proper care, shelter, and then placement. we also provide pet owners with alternatives when they think they have no…

Human Services
5
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
6
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
7
Santa Barbara Wildlife Care Network

Santa barbara wildlife care network (sbwcn) serves to rescue, rehabilitate and return to the wild sick, injured, orphaned, or oil-impaired wild birds, reptiles, amphibians, and small mammals in santa barbara and ventura counties and to…

Animals
8
Rancho Coastal Humane Society

See schedule orancho coastal is dedicated to the rescue and shelter of abandoned companion animals. it encourages adoptions into loving homes and provides educational and community outreach programs designed to enhance the human-animal…

Animals
9
Silicon Valley Pet Project

Silicon valley pet project (svpp) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to saving local at-risk shelter pets through rescue, community involvement and education.

Animals
10
Southwest Wildlife Conservation Center

Saving our wildlife, one life at a time, by rescuing, rehabilitating, and releasing injured, displaced, and orphaned wildlife, while educating the community on the importance of native wildlife and participating in scientific research

Animals
11
Zoological Society of San Diego

San diego zoo wildlife alliance is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.

Animals
12
Animal Protective Foundation of Schenectady Inc

Provide care and adoption services for homeless animals and educate the public about spay/neuter programs and animal care.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California State Parks Foundation; the most unlike its peers is K9 Connection Pet Re Homing and Adoption Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Y-NOT SAVE A SAM RESCUE: $47,800 · OtherY-NOT SAVE A SAM RESCUESHEBOYGAN NORTH HIGH SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherSHEBOYGAN NORTH HIGH SCHOOLSHEBOYGAN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $25,000 · OtherSHEBOYGAN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTPLAYING AGAIN SAMS OF WISCONSIN: $13,500 · OtherPLAYING AGAIN SAMS OF WISCONSIN+9 more: $15,500 · Other+9 moreAMAZING GRACE EQUINE SANCTUARY INC: $25,750 · AnimalsAMAZING GRACE EQUIN…LIONS TIGERS AND BEARS: $3,500 · AnimalsLIONS TIGERS AND BE…K9 Connection Pet Re Homing and Adoption Inc: $1,500 · Animals+2 more: $2,000 · Animals+2 moreASSET BUILDERS OF AMERICA INC: $12,500 · EducationASSET BUI…DON DIEGO SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationDON DIEGO…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $3,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 · InternationalPalm Springs Plaza Theatre Foundation: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$126,800Animals$32,750Education$15,500Recreation & Sports$6,000Philanthropy$6,000International$5,500Arts & Culture$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetY-NOT SAVE A SAM RESCUE: $47,800 over 7y, 15% of budgetAMAZING GRACE EQUINE SANCTUARY INC: $25,750 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetASSET BUILDERS OF AMERICA INC: $12,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIONS TIGERS AND BEARS: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPalm Springs Plaza Theatre Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDON DIEGO SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVISION TO LEARN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOREVER BALBOA PARK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN7.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Feingold Family Charitable Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Feingold Family Charitable Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Feingold Family Charitable Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home