Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue.

$67M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Food & Nutrition$1.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$300kReligion$289kHuman Services$157kHealth$107kEducation$102kHousing & Shelter$82kCivil Rights$47kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $45,572 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $67,155,310 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $67,109,738 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$45,572
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROTHER BENNO FOUNDATION INC$45,572
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SD: $32k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SD: $26k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO: $18k → 11%Jewish Family Services of SD: $13k → 11%SHERMAN HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTER CORP: $17k → 11%PROJECT 11: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 10 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
36

Total granted

$1.0M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+4%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesReligionHealthCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    STEPPING HIGHER INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $127k · revenue +57% · 48% of their budget
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO
    4× · 2018–2021 · $89k · revenue +368%
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $82k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • LC
    LIFE CHRISTIAN CENTER INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES OF SAN DIEGO
    one grant, 2022 · $173k
  • TP
    Tricity Pantry
    one grant, 2022 · $109k · 66% of their budget
  • IA
    I Am My Brothers Keeper Cdc
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -27% · 82% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Door Opportunities

Feeding the homeless population in san d

Food & Nutrition
2
Urban Angels Co Scott Lutwak

Urban angels is designed to nourish and provide food for the homeless and hungry of san dieo, ca. urban angels provides feeding services every wednesday in collboration with the salvation army and is the primary food provider for residents…

3
Catholic Charities Diocese of San Diego

Catholic Charities provides social services and administers various governmental and social programs. Designed to meet the challenge of the ever-changing community by utilizing spiritual, human and financial resources, our programs enable…

Human Services
4
Basket Brigade of San Diego

Focused on bringing holiday meals full of hope to families in need in the san diego area.

5
The 29 Palms Community Food Pantry

Emergency food and shelter program servicing approx 5,500 people in the 29 Palms area. Hours of operation are: mom-fri 9:30 to 11:30, 2nd and 4th Wed of each month 17:00 to 18:30, and 1st Sat each month 9:30 to 18:30.

Food & Nutrition
6
San Diego Catholic Worker Inc

To assist the needy in San Diego CA

7
Foodbank of Southern California

Distribute food to nonprofit agencies

Food & Nutrition
8
North County Community Food Bank

Emergency food services provided to families in need.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Bank Coalition of San Luis Obispo County

Procurement and distribution of food to agencies serving the needy.

Food & Nutrition
10
Hunger 2 Help Inc

To provide assistance and aid to the homeless in downtown san diego

Human Services
11
Coastal Roots Farm

Coastal roots farm cultivates healthy, connected communities by integrating sustainable agriculture, food justice, and ancient jewish wisdom.

12
Feeding America Riverside San Bernardino Counties

Our mission is to alleviate hunger in the inland empire of southern california.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brother Benno Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Third Avenue Charitable Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLaw Enforcement & Professio…Jewish Community ServicesPublic Charter SchoolsSan Diego Community Foundat…Youth Development & Mentori…Veteran Support ServicesK-12 School Support Organiz…Senior Care ServicesSan Diego Regional Land Con…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr16%16%5–10yr21%16%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr10%24%35–55yr12%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%17%5–10yr21%5%10–20yr16%50%20–35yr10%16%35–55yr12%12%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/47
the rest of the field
14%
2,128/14,714

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
17/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK — $399,000 · OtherIMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANKLIFE CHRISTIAN CENTER INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES OF SAN DIEGO — $173,480 · OtherLIFE CHRISTIAN CENTER INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES OF SAN DIEGORONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO INC — $76,629 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO INCBETHESDA RECOVERY CENTER — $52,988 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $41,500 · OtherMCALISTER INSTITUTE FOR TREATMENT & EDUCATION INC — $54,327 · OtherVIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO — $47,366 · Other+22 more — $335,551 · Other+22 moreTricity Pantry — $109,417 · Food & NutritionTricity PantryThe Community Food Connection — $94,261 · Food & NutritionThe Community Food C…EQUATION COLLABORATIVE CORP — $64,963 · Food & NutritionEQUATION COLLABORATI…Third Avenue Charitable Organization — $59,041 · Food & NutritionThird Avenue Charita…BROTHER BENNO FOUNDATION INC — $45,572 · Food & NutritionBROTHER BENNO FOUNDA…HEAVEN'S WINDOWS — $38,000 · Food & NutritionHEAVEN'S WINDOWSSTEPPING HIGHER INC — $127,291 · EducationSTEPPING HI…NATIVITY PREP ACADEMY OF SAN DIEGO INC — $89,000 · EducationNATIVITY PR…+2 more — $12,500 · Education+2 moreTERI Inc — $66,981 · ReligionFALLBROOK FOOD PANTRY — $35,000 · ReligionSANTEE FOOD BANK — $26,118 · ReligionJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO — $89,350 · Human ServicesSherman Heights Community Center Corporation — $16,665 · Human ServicesPROJECT 11 — $9,960 · Human ServicesI Am My Brothers Keeper Cdc — $100,000 · Community ImprovementSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC — $81,862 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,180,841Food & Nutrition$411,254Education$228,791Religion$128,099Human Services$115,975Community Improvement$100,000Housing & Shelter$81,862

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK — $399,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetSTEPPING HIGHER INC — $127,291 over 4y, 48% of budgetTricity Pantry — $109,417 over 1y, 66% of budgetI Am My Brothers Keeper Cdc — $100,000 over 1y, 82% of budgetThe Community Food Connection — $94,261 over 1y, 72% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO — $89,350 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVITY PREP ACADEMY OF SAN DIEGO INC — $89,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC — $81,862 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO INC — $76,629 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTERI Inc — $66,981 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEQUATION COLLABORATIVE CORP — $64,963 over 1y, 11% of budgetThird Avenue Charitable Organization — $59,041 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetMCALISTER INSTITUTE FOR TREATMENT & EDUCATION INC — $54,327 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBETHESDA RECOVERY CENTER — $52,988 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO — $47,366 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBROTHER BENNO FOUNDATION INC — $45,572 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHEAVEN'S WINDOWS — $38,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetLIVED EXPERIENCES INC — $37,164 over 1y, 19% of budgetFALLBROOK FOOD PANTRY — $35,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSANTEE FOOD BANK — $26,118 over 1y, 33% of budgetNorth County LGBTQ Resource Center — $25,800 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSherman Heights Community Center Corporation — $16,665 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetWESLEY HOUSE STUDENT RESIDENCE INC — $11,121 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT 11 — $9,960 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetSpecial Delivery San Diego — $6,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetASSOCIATED STUDENTS INC OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS — $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food BankCA47× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank · The San Diego Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · The Parker Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Feeding San Diego funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Feeding San Diego?

    Find your warmest path to Feeding San Diego through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph