Skip to content
Fedcahh Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Fedcahh Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$108kEducation$12kPhilanthropy$10kReligion$5kHuman Services$3kAnimals$1kFood & Nutrition$1kHealth$759Other$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLOBAL GIVING$9,900
GIVE LIVELY FOUNDATION$6,345
VINE 919$2,100
BRAHMA KUMARIS WORLD SPIRITUALITY$2,000
BHAGYODAY FOUNDATION$2,000
BEYOND BORDERS$235
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$200
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$75
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AIM for Seva Inc: $500 → 12%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $3k → 7%NAVKAR CENTER: $500 → 14%INDO-US FOUNDATION: $45k → 14%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%INDO-US FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%NAVKAR CENTER: $200 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AR
TN
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$123k · 15 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
35

Total granted

$123k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+28%

Still filing today

67%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalAnimalsHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    INDO-US FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $75k · revenue +208%
  • CN
    Charity Navigator
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k · revenue +86%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    2× · 2018–2021 · $923 · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +113%
  • TN
    THE NAVIGATORS
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • LM
    LINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +81%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
5
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
6
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
7
American National Standards Institute

To enhance both the global competitiveness of u.s. business and the u.s. quality of life by promoting and facilitating voluntary consensus standards and conformity assessment systems, and safeguarding their integrity.

Public Benefit
8
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
9
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
10
The International Dark-Sky Association Inc

Darksky international restores the nighttime environment and protects communities from the harmful effects of light pollution through outreach, advocacy, and conservation.

—
11
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United States Fund for Unicef; the most unlike its peers is Bosleys Place Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDO-US FOUNDATION: $74,578 · Human ServicesINDO-US FOUNDATIONCharity Navigator: $3,474 · Human Services+3 more: $1,400 · Human ServicesGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $28,540 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION…+4 more: $1,958 · International+4 moreNavkar Center - USA: $5,750 · OtherNavkar Center - US…BRAHMA KUMARIS WORLD SPIRITUAL ORGANIZATION: $3,000 · OtherBRAHMA KUMARIS WOR…Asha for Education: $3,000 · OtherAsha for EducationBHAGYODAY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · OtherBHAGYODAY FOUNDATI…THE NAVIGATORS: $1,500 · OtherTHE NAVIGATORSLINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · Other+30 more: $7,849 · Other+30 moreGIVE LIVELY FOUNDATION INC: $6,345 · Philanthropy+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyTHE VINE919 INC: $2,100 · Youth DevelopmentKINGSWOOD HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $600 · Youth DevelopmentTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNETWORK FOR GOOD: $300 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 · AnimalsBOSLEYS PLACE INC: $400 · AnimalsSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS WAKE COUNTY INC: $250 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $100 · Animals
Human Services$79,452International$30,498Other$24,099Philanthropy$6,445Youth Development$2,700Public Safety & Disaster$2,300Animals$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINDO-US FOUNDATION: $74,578 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $28,540 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE LIVELY FOUNDATION INC: $6,345 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $3,474 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VINE919 INC: $2,100 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $923 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKINGSWOOD HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSEA FEED THE HUNGRY AND HOMELESS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSLEYS PLACE INC: $400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS WAKE COUNTY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND BORDERS INC: $235 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHands on Atlanta Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSUMER REPORTS INC: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings F…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…Raymond James Charita…The Bank of America C…The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Paypal Charitable Giv…Donor Advised Charita…
Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO12× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fedcahh Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fedcahh Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fedcahh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home