Skip to content

· Public charity

Favre 4 Hope Foundation Inc

To support charitable organizations whose focus is to provide support for disadvantaged children who reside in mississippi, wisconsin, and minnesota.

$130k
Granted FY2021
11
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$25k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

94% of Favre 4 Hope Foundation Inc’s FY2022 grant dollars went to The Greater Pinebelt Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Favre 4 Hope Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $125k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
’17
9
’18
9
’19
9
’20
10
’21
8
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$1.2MHealth$527kEducation$153kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kHuman Services$25kInternational$25kHousing & Shelter$25kCrime & Legal$20k
02FY2021 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $125,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $130,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEVE MARIUCCI FAMILY BEACON HOUSE$25,000
USM ATHLETIC FOUNDATION$10,000
ARC$10,000
PINK RIBBON FUND$10,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF MS$10,000
HOPE HAVEN$10,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF MS$10,000
RAWHIDE$10,000
USM CHILDRENS CENTER FOR COMMUNICAT$10,000
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AT GULFPORT FOUND$10,000
RIBBON OF HOPE FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$634k · 9 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$634k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+134%

Still filing today

78%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyReligionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI ATHLETIC FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $153k · revenue +17%
  • RI
    RAWHIDE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $70k · revenue +72%
  • TA
    THE ARC SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI
    6× · 2017–2022 · $60k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +134%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +46%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY - BIRMINGHAM ALABAMA AREA COMMAND
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sacred Heart Foundation Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-center, holistic care which…

Health
2
Sarh Holdings Inc

The mission of sarh is to improve the health and healing of the people of south arkansas, and its vision is to be the regional health care provider of choice through the values of "we care": welcoming, excellence, compassion, adaptability,…

Health
3
Mercy Harvard Hospital Inc

The mission of mercy harvard hospital, inc. (mhh) is "exceptional health care services with a passion for making lives better." the foundation of this mission is based on a vision of quality: excellence in patient care; service:…

Health
4
The Methodist Hospital

To provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a spiritual environment of caring in association with internationally recognized teaching and research.

Health
5
Harrison Medical Center Foundation

Harrison medical center foundation is a not-for-profit organization that raises and manages charitable gifts for the benefit of harrison medical center. as a friend of the hospital, the foundation's purpose is to make a positive difference…

—
6
University of Southern Mississippi Foundation

To build relationships with alumni and friends in order to secure private funds and other resources for the benefit of the university of southern mississippi (usm). the foundation receives, invests and distributes private gifts in support…

Education
7
University of Southern Mississippi Research Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to oversee the acquisition of gifts, contributions and grants for sponsored research for individuals, industries, private organizations and government agencies and to assist with transferring technology…

Education
8
Our Mississippi Foundation
Community Improvement
9
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
10
South Sunflower County Hospital Foundation

Assist and support south sunflower county hospital in the improvement of health to the citizens of sunflower county, ms and surrounding area, and to improve access to health care services and to provide community health education.

Health
11
Rockford Health Physicians

To improve and protect the health and welfare of the community in accordance with our mission, the mission of rockford health physicians is "exceptional health care services with a passion for making lives better." the foundation of this…

Health
12
Providence Foundation

We commit ourselves to serving all persons, with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. providence hospital is dedicated to providing care which sustains and improves the health of individuals and communities. we are…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Mississippi Chartered; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PINEBELT FOUNDATION: $1,159,070 · PhilanthropyPINEBELT FOUNDATIONRIBBON OF HOPE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $60,000 · PhilanthropyRAWHIDE INC: $70,000 · OtherRAWHIDE INCSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF MS: $61,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPIC…THE PINK RIBBON FUND INC: $60,000 · OtherTHE PINK RIBBON…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI: $60,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF S…SALVATION ARMY - BIRMINGHAM ALABAMA AREA COMMAND: $25,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY …UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $152,992 · EducationMEMORIAL HOSPITAL AT GULFPORT FOUNDATION INC: $66,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI CHARTERED: $60,000 · HealthHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF THE UPPER PENINSULA: $25,000 · HealthTHE ARC SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI: $60,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HAVEN OF HANCOCK COUNTY INC: $50,000 · Crime & LegalSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $25,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$1,219,070Other$276,000Education$152,992Health$151,000Human Services$85,000Crime & Legal$50,000Religion$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPINEBELT FOUNDATION: $1,159,070 over 2y, 10% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $152,992 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetRAWHIDE INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMEMORIAL HOSPITAL AT GULFPORT FOUNDATION INC: $66,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetTHE ARC SOUTHEAST MISSISSIPPI: $60,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetRIBBON OF HOPE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $60,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI CHARTERED: $60,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetHOPE HAVEN OF HANCOCK COUNTY INC: $50,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF THE UPPER PENINSULA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pinebelt FoundationMS19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pinebelt Foundation · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Favre 4 Hope Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Favre 4 Hope Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Favre 4 Hope Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Favre 4 Hope Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Favre 4 Hope’s filings →

    More from the funding graph