Loading…
· Public charity
FAVRE 4 HOPE FOUNDATION INC
To support charitable organizations whose focus is to provide support for disadvantaged children who reside in mississippi, wisconsin, and minnesota.
$1.2M
Granted FY2022
10
Grants
2
Communities
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2022.
Philanthropy$1.2MEducation$153kHealth$151kHuman Services$85kCrime & Legal$50kReligion$25kOther$276k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
athletic
2019
athletic
2020
athletic
2021
athletic
2022
build
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2022 · 10 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- $10k–50k9 grants · $90k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
- PINE BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,134,070
- HOPE HAVEN$10,000
- SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF MS$10,000
- RAWHIDE$10,000
- ARC$10,000
- MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AT GULFPORT FOUND$10,000
- PINK RIBBON FUND$10,000
- RIBBON OF HOPE FOUNDATION$10,000
- USM CHILDRENS CENTER FOR COMMUNICAT$10,000
- MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF MS$10,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 11 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else
11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
11
4
Total granted
$1.9M
$100k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+72%
+134%
Still filing today
73%
75%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationReligionCrime & LegalOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PBPINE BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2022 · $1.2M · revenue +173%
- UAUSM ATHLETIC FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2021 · $153k · revenue +27%
- RRAWHIDE6× · 2017–2022 · $70k · revenue +72%
Funded once
- SPSAMARITANS PURSEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +134%
- ARAMERICAN RED CROSSone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +9%
- SASALVATION ARMYone grant, 2017 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Mississippi Methodist Hospital
Mississippi methodist rehabilitation center provides comprehensive medical rehabilitation services to help people recover abilities and quality of life after a stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neurological disease or…
Health
2
University of Southern Mississippi
The mission of the foundation is to oversee the acquisition of gifts, contributions and grants for sponsored research for individuals, industries, private organizations and government agencies and to assist with transferring technology…
Education
3
South Sunflower County Hospital
Assist and support south sunflower county hospital in the improvement of health to the citizens of sunflower county, ms and surrounding area, and to improve access to health care services and to provide community health education.
Health
4
University of Southern Mississippi
The mission of the alumni association is to benefit the university of southern mississippi, its students, and alumni through upholding traditions, sponsoring activities, events, and publications.
Education
5
Monroe Health Foundation Inc
The promotion of health through charitable, educational, and scientific purposes primarily in and for the benefit of monroe county, alabama and to encourage broad based support of monroe county hospital.
Health
6
The Foundation of Marshall Medical
To provide health care benefits to poor, indigent and medically underserved persons in marshall, dekalb, etowah, cullman, blount and morgan counties in the state of alabama.
Philanthropy
7
Health Care Foundation of North Ms
Health care foundation of north mississippi is operated exclusively for the purpose of raising, receiving, and administering funds to assist hospital and non-profit institutions in north mississippi.
Health
8
Mercy Harvard Hospital Inc
Exceptional health care services with a passion for making lives better.
Health
9
Baptist Memorial Hospital-Desoto Inc
Baptist memorial hospital-desoto, inc. provides quality medical health care regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, or age.
Health
10
Mississippi Sports Medicine Foundation
Education
11
Mercy Health Corporation
Mercy Health Corporation (MHC) serves as the parent corporation and has a mission to provide exceptional healthcare services with a passion for making lives better. MHC supports the operations of its affiliated entities to enable them to…
Philanthropy
12
The Southeast Alabama Medical
Our mission is to support healthcare in southeast alabama and surrounding areas. the foundation provides financial support to the houston county health care authority dba southeast health medical center (southeast health) and its…
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Mississippi and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Philanthropy$1,219,070Other$276,000Education$152,992Health$151,000Human Services$85,000Crime & Legal$50,000Religion$25,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PINE BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds USM ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAWHIDE ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AT GULFPORT FOUND ↗
- Who funds MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF MS ↗
- Who funds ARC ↗
- Who funds RIBBON OF HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE HAVEN ↗
- Who funds SAMARITANS PURSE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN RED CROSS ↗
- Who funds STEVE MARIUCCI FAMILY BEACON HOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The United Way of SoutheastMS13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The United Way of Southeast · Pinebelt Foundation · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation FAVRE 4 HOPE FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PINE BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~24 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.7× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 721390352 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on PINE BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 24 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 10% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Favre 4 Hope Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Favre 4 Hope Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines