Skip to content
Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation

THE FAUQUIER HEALTH FOUNDATION STRENGTHENS THE HEALTH AND VITALITY OF THE COMMUNITY IT SERVES.

$9.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
369
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$539k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$19MEducation$11MCommunity Improvement$7.6MHuman Services$7.3MHousing & Shelter$6.8MPhilanthropy$4.9MFood & Nutrition$4.7MArts & Culture$2.1MOther$0
02FY2025 · 369 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k181 grants · $424k
  • $10k–50k142 grants · $3.0M
  • $50k–250k39 grants · $3.3M
  • $250k+7 grants · $2.6M
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$302M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAUQUIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$538,778
PEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA$500,000
RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$400,000
CENTER FOR NONPROFIT EXCELLENCE$395,097
4P FOODS$250,000
NORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$250,000
FAUQUIER FREE CLINIC$250,000
RAPPAHANNOCK-RAPIDAN REGIONAL COMMISSION$240,000
CULPEPER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$235,000
THE RECTOR & VISITORS OF UVA FBO ADVISINGVA$165,000
THE RECTOR & VISITORS OF UVA FBO ADVISINGVA$165,000
HUMANKIND$156,300
FAUQUIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$150,000
ENCOMPASS COMMUNITY SUPPORTS$120,000
CULPEPER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$102,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RAPPAHANNOCK BENEVOLENT FUND: $33k → 14%CHILDHELP: $25k → 8%HUMANKIND: $156k → 8%HERO'S BRIDGE: $25k → 10%HERO'S BRIDGE: $67k → 6%HERO'S BRIDGE: $67k → 6%HERO'S BRIDGE: $50k → 6%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $85k → 6%HERO'S BRIDGE: $75k → 6%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $75k → 6%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $50k → 6%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $50k → 6%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $50k → 6%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $50k → 6%AGING TOGETHER: $100k → 8%AGING TOGETHER: $100k → 8%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $50k → 6%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $50k → 6%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $50k → 6%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $40k → 6%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $40k → 6%RAPPHOME: $78k → 10%RAPPHOME: $40k → 6%RAPPHOME: $65k → 10%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $40k → 6%RAPP AT HOME INC: $65k → 10%RAPP AT HOME INC: $50k → 10%RAPPAHANNOCK BENEVOLENT FUND: $50k → 10%RAPPHOME: $50k → 10%RAPPAHANNOCK BENEVOLENT FUND: $50k → 10%RAPPAHANNOCK BENEVOLENT FUND: $50k → 10%CULPEPER BAPTIST CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $40k → 8%RAPPAHANNOCK BENEVOLENT FUND: $42k → 10%RAPPHOME: $40k → 10%RAPPHOME: $40k → 10%RAPPHOME: $40k → 10%RAPPAHANNOCK BENEVOLENT FUND: $33k → 10%RAPPAHANNOCK BENEVOLENT FUND: $33k → 10%RAPP AT HOME INC: $30k → 10%RAPPAHANNOCK BENEVOLENT FUND: $25k → 10%RAPPAHANNOCK BENEVOLENT FUND: $25k → 10%HIGHLAND SCHOOL: $25k → 6%HOPE HEALS FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $25k → 6%RAPP AT HOME INC: $25k → 10%FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $50k → 6%HERO'S BRIDGE: $75k → 6%RAPPAHANNOCK BENEVOLENT FUND: $40k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
NY
NJ
RI
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
NM
NC
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 94%.

Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60M · 193 repeat orgs$6.1M to everyone else

193 repeat relationships: 131 still active in FY2025, 62 since wound down; 62 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

193
194

Total granted

$60M
$5.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+27%

Still filing today

58%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FAUQUIER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +30% · 96% of their budget
  • FF
    FAUQUIER FISH
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +98% · 27% of their budget
  • FF
    FAUQUIER FREE CLINIC INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • CO
    COUNTY OF FAUQUIERFAUQUIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2023 · $1.5M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $500k
  • TH
    THE HERREN PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $500k · revenue +36% · 42% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Virginia Community Food Connections

Our mission is to ensure the availability, access, and affordability of locally produced food by connecting local farmers and all members of the community through programs, awareness, and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
2
Virginia Community Action Partnership Inc

Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…

Human Services
3
Virginia Foundation for Agriculture Innovation and Rural Sustainability

To assist rural virginians in developing and advancing their agricultural, economic and social interests to enhance their quality of life.

Environment
4
The Commonwealth Institute for

To use policy, research, and analysis to advance the well-being of Virginia communities, and improve the economic security and social opportunities of all Virginians.

Public Benefit
5
SeniorNavigatorcom

SeniorNavigator and its family of websites are national models for aging, disability and veteran information. By combining online assistance with a network of community-based centers, the websites bring over 26,000 community resources,…

Community Improvement
6
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
7
GoochlandCares

GoochlandCares (GC) provides basic human services for local individuals who need help with healthcare, housing, food, clothing, and domestic violence services, providing a safety net for 2,135 Goochland residents and their families in 2024.

Health
8
Federation of Virginia Food Banks

Facilitating statewide collaboration among Virginia's food banks, partners, and neighbors to improve nutrition security and empower strong, healthy communities.

—
9
Virginia Recreation and Park Foundation

Promoting and improving leisure opportunities and amenities in Virginia. Futhering the course of research and development in all areas of leisure in Virginia.

—
10
Citizens for Fauquier County

Conservation and Preservation of rural Fauquier County

Environment
11
Historic Virginia Land Conservancy

Promoting for the benefit of the general public, the preservation, protection and enjoyment of our natural resources, principally in the lower james, york, rappahannock and chowan rivers and surrounding watersheds.

Environment
12
Free Clinic of Franklin County Inc

The free clinic of franklin county, inc is founded on the belief that everyone should have access to quality, affordable, primary health care regardless of their socio-economic or insurance status.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Path Partnerships; the most unlike its peers is Sherwood Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

195 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 195 of the 456 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

42
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
65
Early backer (in before they grew)
189/195
Grantees still filing
121/195
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PATH PARTNERSHIPS: $10,528,500 · OtherPATH PARTNERSHIPSFAUQUIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $4,032,807 · OtherFAUQUIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLSFAUQUIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT: $3,406,234 · OtherFAUQUIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTRAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3,155,275 · OtherRAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS4P FOODS INC: $1,800,000 · OtherCULPEPER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $1,786,735 · OtherRAPPAHANNOCK-RAPIDAN COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD: $1,695,764 · Other+140 more: $22,804,705 · Other+140 moreNORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,673,182 · PhilanthropyNORTHERN PI…FAUQUIER FISH: $2,115,829 · PhilanthropyFAUQUIER FI…CENTER FOR NONPROFIT EXCELLENCE: $1,056,293 · PhilanthropyCENTER FOR …+5 more: $314,774 · PhilanthropyFAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $750,775 · Human ServicesRAPP AT HOME: $696,000 · Human ServicesHERO'S BRIDGE: $652,517 · Human ServicesRAPPAHANNOCK BENEVOLENT FUND INC: $428,130 · Human ServicesAging Together Corporation: $277,550 · Human ServicesGIRLS ON THE RUN PIEDMONT: $186,209 · Human ServicesHope Heals Foundation: $164,500 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN HOMES & FAMILY SVCS: $156,300 · Human Services+6 more: $358,241 · Human ServicesFAUQUIER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $2,393,947 · Housing & ShelterFAUQUIER FAMILY SHELTER SERVICES: $615,125 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY TOUCH INC: $575,750 · Housing & ShelterCULPEPER WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC: $874,500 · HealthTHE HERREN PROJECT: $500,000 · HealthPIEDMONT REGIONAL DENTAL CLINIC INC: $440,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY INC: $367,012 · HealthSPIRITWORKS FOUNDATION: $262,500 · HealthMORGANS MESSAGE INC: $195,964 · HealthTHE WARRENTON MEETING PLACE: $121,700 · HealthCULPEPER ADULT DAY CARE CENTER INC: $117,000 · Health+3 more: $144,083 · HealthRAPPAHANNOCK PANTRY INC: $629,010 · Food & NutritionFAUQUIER EDUCATION FARM INC: $512,021 · Food & NutritionMinority and Veteran Farmers of the Piedmont Inc: $190,750 · Food & NutritionFAUQUIER COMMUNITY FOOD BANK & THRIFT STORE: $185,625 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN VIRGINIA FOOD RESCUE: $91,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $50,000 · Food & NutritionPIEDMONT DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER INC: $489,836 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $347,500 · Arts & CultureFOOTHILLS FORUM: $231,402 · Arts & CultureAFRO-AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY: $226,000 · Arts & CultureKid Pan Alley: $108,600 · Arts & CultureARTISTS IN MIDDLEBURG: $92,026 · Arts & CultureWINDMORE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $65,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $86,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$49,210,020Philanthropy$7,160,078Human Services$3,670,222Housing & Shelter$3,584,822Health$3,022,759Food & Nutrition$1,658,406Arts & Culture$1,646,364

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPATH PARTNERSHIPS: $10,528,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetNORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,673,182 over 9y, 31% of budgetFAUQUIER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $2,393,947 over 7y, 96% of budgetFAUQUIER FISH: $2,115,829 over 7y, 27% of budgetCULPEPER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $1,786,735 over 6y, 64% of budgetFAUQUIER FREE CLINIC INC: $1,532,482 over 6y, 12% of budgetPEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA: $1,265,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetCENTER FOR NONPROFIT EXCELLENCE: $1,056,293 over 4y, 20% of budgetCULPEPER WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC: $874,500 over 7y, 7.5% of budgetFAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC: $750,775 over 7y, 18% of budgetRAPP AT HOME: $696,000 over 7y, 58% of budgetHERO'S BRIDGE: $652,517 over 7y, 51% of budgetRAPPAHANNOCK PANTRY INC: $629,010 over 7y, 20% of budgetFAUQUIER FAMILY SHELTER SERVICES: $615,125 over 7y, 15% of budgetCOMMUNITY TOUCH INC: $575,750 over 7y, 37% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FAUQUIER INC: $573,068 over 6y, 26% of budgetYOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $515,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetFAUQUIER EDUCATION FARM INC: $512,021 over 8y, 45% of budgetTHE HERREN PROJECT: $500,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetFOOTHILLS HOUSING CORPORATION: $496,000 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetPIEDMONT DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER INC: $489,836 over 7y, 15% of budgetWINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC: $472,150 over 7y, 8.4% of budgetPIEDMONT REGIONAL DENTAL CLINIC INC: $440,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetGeorge Washington Carver Agriculture Research Center Inc: $434,500 over 4y, 68% of budgetRAPPAHANNOCK BENEVOLENT FUND INC: $428,130 over 6y, 36% of budgetTHE CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTER: $391,735 over 5y, 11% of budgetVERDUN ADVENTURE BOUND INC: $377,576 over 7y, 17% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY INC: $367,012 over 7y, 56% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $347,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLAUREL RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $346,689 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetEXPERIENCE OLD TOWN WARRENTON INC: $319,365 over 7y, 31% of budgetRAPPU INC: $317,570 over 7y, 33% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK: $300,937 over 7y, 8.4% of budgetServices to Abused Families Inc: $281,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetAging Together Corporation: $277,550 over 6y, 46% of budgetCASA CHILDRENS INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $275,550 over 5y, 17% of budgetHEADWATERS THE RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $270,825 over 8y, 23% of budgetSPIRITWORKS FOUNDATION: $262,500 over 5y, 27% of budgetPIEDMONT JOURNALISM FOUNDATION: $252,500 over 6y, 34% of budgetFOOTHILLS FORUM: $231,402 over 7y, 21% of budgetAFRO-AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY: $226,000 over 3y, 42% of budgetTHE CLIFTON INSTITUTE INC: $206,636 over 8y, 24% of budgetLEADERSHIP FAUQUIER: $204,800 over 9y, 72% of budgetMORGANS MESSAGE INC: $195,964 over 5y, 20% of budgetFAUQUIER YOUTH LIVESTOCK ADVISORY COUNCIL: $194,448 over 7y, 96% of budgetMinority and Veteran Farmers of the Piedmont Inc: $190,750 over 4y, 70% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN PIEDMONT: $186,209 over 7y, 54% of budgetFAUQUIER COMMUNITY FOOD BANK & THRIFT STORE: $185,625 over 5y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PATH PARTNERSHIPS ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAUQUIER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAUQUIER FISH ↗
  • Who funds CULPEPER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds FAUQUIER FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR NONPROFIT EXCELLENCE ↗
  • Who funds CULPEPER WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAUQUIER COMMUNITY CHILD CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds RAPP AT HOME ↗
  • Who funds HERO'S BRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds RAPPAHANNOCK PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAUQUIER FAMILY SHELTER SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY TOUCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FAUQUIER INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FAUQUIER EDUCATION FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERREN PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILLS HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT REGIONAL DENTAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds George Washington Carver Agriculture Research Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds RAPPAHANNOCK BENEVOLENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds VERDUN ADVENTURE BOUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Northern Piedmont Com…The Jesse and Rose Lo…Fhi ServicesCulpeper Wellness Fou…Wise FoundationBlue Ridge Community …Uva Culpeper Medical …The William and Mary …William M Backer Foun…The Luminescence Foun…The Jacquemin Family …Dun Foundation
Northern Piedmont Community FoundationVA198.6× affinity100 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northern Piedmont Community Foundation · The Jesse and Rose Loeb Foundation Inc · Fhi Services · Culpeper Wellness Foundation Inc · Wise Foundation · Blue Ridge Community Foundation · Uva Culpeper Medical Center · The William and Mary Greve Foundation Inc · William M Backer Foundation Inc · The Luminescence Foundation Inc · The Jacquemin Family Foundation Inc · Dun Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    46report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 456 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home