Skip to content

· Private foundation

Farley Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$420k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$7.2MEducation$3.4MEnvironment$2.2MArts & Culture$2.0MEmployment$1.0MHuman Services$816kHousing & Shelter$606kRecreation & Sports$338kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $681k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.4M
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPARKSHOP$420,000
Individual grant recipient$330,000
AMERICAN PRECISION MUSEUM$325,000
Individual grant recipient$305,000
FELLOWSHIP HOUSING CORPORATION$203,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA ROSA$125,000
SCOTTSDALE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION$107,500
HOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL$100,000
LUTHER BURBANK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$95,000
HOMEWOOD SCIENCE CENTER$50,000
NORTHERN CINCINNATI FOUNDATION$10,000
AUDUBON CANYON RANCH$10,000
ST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL$8,000
FORGET ME NOT CHILDRENS SERVICES$5,000
HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $943k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FORGET ME NOT CHILDRENS SERVICES: $8k → 9%FORGET ME NOT CHILDRENS SERVICES: $8k → 9%FORGET ME NOT CHILDRENS SERVICES: $5k → 9%FORGET ME NOT CHILDRENS SERVICES: $5k → 9%FORGET ME NOT CHILDRENS SERVICES: $5k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA ROSA: $330k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA ROSA: $160k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA ROSA: $138k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA ROSA: $125k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA ROSA: $125k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA ROSA: $35k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
WI
OH
CA
NE
AZ
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 23 repeat orgs$415k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
5

Total granted

$20M
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+302%

Still filing today

78%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $335k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $7.2M · revenue +31%
  • AC
    AUDUBON CANYON RANCH INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +52%
  • AP
    AMERICAN PRECISION MUSEUM INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +412% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • UC
    USS CINCINNATI COMMISSIONING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • EC
    ERNEST C OBERHOLTZER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +302%
  • SI
    SHELTON-REID INC
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
2
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
3
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
4
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to promote sustainability in the Bay Area and beyond by engaging communities in avian science, habitat restoration, and education.

Environment
5
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
6
Land Trust of Santa Cruz County

Land trust of santa cruz county (the organization) was incorporated in california as a not-for-profit corporation in 1978. the mission of the organization is to protect, care for, and connect all people to the vibrant natural and working…

Environment
7
Sonoma Land Trust

Protect the scenic, natural, cultural, agricultural and open landscapes of sonoma county for the benefit of the community and future generations by developing long-term land protection strategies; (continued on schedule o) promoting…

Environment
8
Santa Lucia Conservancy

To protect and steward in perpetuity the unique natural, cultural, and asthetic resources of the preserve and serve as a model of ecologically sustainable development to committees outside the preserve.

Environment
9
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation (nff), chartered by congress, turns america's love of nature into meaningful action for 193-million acre national forest system through on the ground program work and grant making activities, and accepts and…

Recreation & Sports
10
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
11
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
12
Museum of Sonoma County

The museum of sonoma county engages and inspires our diverse community with art and history exhibitions, collections, and public programs that are inclusive, educational, and relevant.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Audubon Canyon Ranch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ernest C Oberholtzer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
20/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $7,225,999 · HealthHONORHEALTH FOUNDATIONHOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL: $2,722,500 · OtherHOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $1,545,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientScottsdale Unified School District Foundation: $626,500 · OtherScottsdale Unified School District Fou…Individual grant recipient: $532,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLUTHER BURBANK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $496,000 · OtherLUTHER BURBANK MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $330,000 · OtherST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL INC: $235,776 · Other+12 more: $260,000 · OtherAUDUBON CANYON RANCH INC: $2,155,000 · EnvironmentAUDUBON CANY…+2 more: $40,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN PRECISION MUSEUM INC: $1,402,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN P…CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY: $370,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S…HOMEWOOD SCIENCE CENTER: $76,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $15,000 · Arts & CultureCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $912,500 · Human ServicesForget Me Not Childrens Services: $33,000 · Human ServicesFellowship Housing Corporation: $809,000 · Housing & ShelterNorthwestern University: $333,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Health$7,225,999Other$6,748,276Environment$2,195,000Arts & Culture$1,863,000Human Services$945,500Housing & Shelter$809,000Recreation & Sports$338,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $7,225,999 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetAUDUBON CANYON RANCH INC: $2,155,000 over 8y, 8.7% of budgetAMERICAN PRECISION MUSEUM INC: $1,402,000 over 8y, 28% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $912,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetFellowship Housing Corporation: $809,000 over 8y, 6.8% of budgetScottsdale Unified School District Foundation: $626,500 over 8y, 65% of budgetLUTHER BURBANK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $496,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY: $370,000 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $333,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEWOOD SCIENCE CENTER: $76,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY WILDLIFE RESCUE: $70,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetFearless Kitty Rescue: $50,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetLaguna De Santa Rosa Foundation: $48,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetForget Me Not Childrens Services: $33,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetNORTHWOODS LAND TRUST INC: $25,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetSTILLMAN NATURE CENTER: $15,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetERNEST C OBERHOLTZER FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVILLAGE HOPECORE INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget10000 DEGREES: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLewa Wildlife Conservancy USA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AUDUBON CANYON RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PRECISION MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA ↗
  • Who funds Fellowship Housing Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Scottsdale Unified School District Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LUTHER BURBANK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWOOD SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA COUNTY WILDLIFE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Fearless Kitty Rescue ↗
  • Who funds USS CINCINNATI COMMISSIONING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Laguna De Santa Rosa Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Forget Me Not Childrens Services ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWOODS LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds STILLMAN NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ERNEST C OBERHOLTZER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NORTHERN CINCINNAI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE HOPECORE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
  • Who funds Lewa Wildlife Conservancy USA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Community FoundationCA19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · The Androcles Foundation Inc · Redwood Credit Union Community Fund Inc · The Heck Foundation · McNabb Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Farley Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Farley Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Farley Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph