Skip to content

· Private foundation

Farber Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$10MEducation$4.4MHousing & Shelter$787kPhilanthropy$724kHuman Services$263kArts & Culture$226kCivil Rights$210kYouth Development$115kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $147k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $197k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.6M
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$1,613,416
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$129,497
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA$68,000
ROCK TO THE FUTURE$30,000
ALS ASSOCIATION$22,000
THE PARKINSON COUNCIL$15,000
WXPN$10,000
NEW HORIZONS$10,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$10,000
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND - KURTZMAN FAMILY PHILANTHROPIC F$10,000
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND - LEIGH AND LEE GOLDBERGER CHARIT$10,000
ABRAMSON SENIOR CARE$10,000
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND - KURTZMAN MENON CHARITABLE FUND$10,000
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND - WILLIAM AND JENNIFER FARBER CHA$10,000
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LAUREL HOUSE: $30k → 7%PHILADELPHIA JEWISH FILMS AND MEDIA: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 20 repeat orgs$573k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$16M
$533k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+10%

Still filing today

40%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthCivil RightsEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +18%
  • HC
    HARCUM COLLEGE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $125k · revenue +65%
  • RT
    ROCK TO THE FUTURE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $115k · revenue +265%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHALLENGE GRANT
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • MJ
    MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +15%
  • NL
    National Liberty Museum
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
2
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
7
Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh

Our vision is a flourishing jewish community where everyone feels included, supported and inspired. in order to accomplish this vision we cultivate resources, connect people and collaborate across the community to live and fulfill jewish…

Philanthropy
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
10
Philadelphia Convention & Visitors Bureau

The philadelphia convention & visitors bureau (phlcvb) is the official tourism promotion agency for the city of philadelphia globally, and the sales and marketing agency for the pennsylvania convention center (pcc). phlcvb markets…

—
11
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
12
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Thomas Jefferson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY - VICKIE & JACK INST FOR NEUROSCIENCE: $8,000,000 · OtherTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY - VICKIE & JACK INST FOR NEUROSCIENCEWILLS EYE INSTITUTE - VICKIE & JACK FARBER VISION RESEARCH CENTER: $2,000,000 · OtherWILLS EYE INSTITUTE - VICKIE & JACK FARBER VISION RESEARCH CENTERHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $536,667 · Other+19 more: $1,027,500 · Other+19 moreTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $3,938,416 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY+2 more: $210,000 · EducationJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $350,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $204,000 · PhilanthropyMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $200,000 · Arts & CultureROCK TO THE FUTURE INC: $115,000 · Arts & CultureNational Liberty Museum: $25,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $110,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $100,000 · Civil RightsLAUREL HOUSE: $163,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE PARKINSON COUNCIL: $85,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $7,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · Health
Other$11,564,167Education$4,148,416Philanthropy$554,000Arts & Culture$340,000Civil Rights$210,000Human Services$164,000Health$93,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $3,938,416 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $350,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $204,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $200,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLAUREL HOUSE: $163,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetHARCUM COLLEGE: $125,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetROCK TO THE FUTURE INC: $115,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARKINSON COUNCIL: $85,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetNational Liberty Museum: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGolden Slipper Club & Charities Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPHILADELPHIA JEWISH FILM AND MEDIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIVEWELL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPENNSYLVANIANS FOR MODERN COURTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAUREL HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HARCUM COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ROCK TO THE FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE PARKINSON COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds National Liberty Museum ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds Golden Slipper Club & Charities Inc ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA JEWISH FILM AND MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds LIVEWELL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIANS FOR MODERN COURTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Peggy & Ellis Wachs Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The William Penn Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Farber Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Farber Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Farber Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Farber Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Farber Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph