Skip to content
Family of Samuel H Schwartz Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Family of Samuel H Schwartz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$32kHealth$15kHuman Services$7kHousing & Shelter$6kFood & Nutrition$5kPhilanthropy$3kInternational$3kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$600
Median grant
7
States reached
$49k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Temple Emanuel of Westfield NJ$3,020
Trevor Project$1,000
God's Love We Deliver$1,000
No Kid Hungry$600
Operation Smile$600
Dig Deep$500
RAINN$500
Women In Need$500
Richard J Caron Foundation$500
Planned Parenthood$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%SUNRISE DAY CAMP: $100 → 11%NATIONAL COALITION FOR HOMELESS VET: $500 → 14%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $500 → 8%HORIZON DAY CAMP: $200 → 19%SID JACOBSON JCC: $5k → 6%NATIONAL COALITION FOR HOMELESS VET: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 17%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $300 → 17%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $150 → 17%COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY: $150 → 17%DOROT: $200 → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $500 → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $500 → 17%Women In Need: $500 → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $300 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
OR
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$61k · 34 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
41

Total granted

$61k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+32%

Still filing today

62%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +31%
  • WOMEN IN NEED INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +66%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • SJ
    SID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +13%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • ST
    SAVE THE CHILDREN
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Jewish Board of Family & Children's Services Inc

To empower new yorkers, providing integrated mental health and social services with compassion and expertise.

Human Services
3
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
4
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
5
Housing Works Inc

Housing works is a vibrant, healing community of people living with and affected by hiv/aids. our mission is to end the dual crises of homelessness and aids through relentless advocacy, the provision of lifesaving services, and…

Community Improvement
6
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
7
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
8
Selfhelp Community Services Inc

A non-profit organization dedicated to maintaining the independence and dignity of seniors and at risk populations through a spectrum of services. selfhelp is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to maintaining the independence and…

Human Services
9
Supportive Housing Network of New York Inc

Founded in 1988, the network's mission is to increase the public's understanding of supportive housing; share best practices that continually improve supportive housing's effectiveness; and, most importantly, encourage the creation of…

Housing & Shelter
10
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
11
Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center Inc

The mission of the daughters of sarah nursing center, inc. is to enhance the quality of life, assure the safety and dignity, and foster the independence of those we serve through residential, personal care, health and other quality…

Health
12
New York Apartment Association Inc

Nyaa provides services to landlords including computerized rent registration of rent stabilized apartments with the new york state division of housing and community renewal in compliance with nys & nyc laws & regulations.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Love We Deliver Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Neshamah Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/50
Grantees still filing
37/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HADASSAH: $15,126 · OtherHADASSAHTEMPLE BETH SHOLOM: $7,675 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHOLOMASTORIA CENTER OF ISRAEL INC: $4,300 · OtherASTORIA CENTER OF ISRAEL INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3,600 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODTemple Emanu-El - Westfield: $3,020 · OtherTemple Emanu-El - WestfieldIndividual grant recipient: $2,300 · Other+44 more: $19,266 · Other+44 moreSID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $4,500 · Human ServicesSID JACOBSON …WOMEN IN NEED INC: $1,800 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN NEED…NATIONAL COALITION FOR HOMELESS VETERANS: $1,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL COAL…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $950 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRI…FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $500 · Human Services+5 more: $1,150 · Human Services+5 moreRICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION: $2,750 · HealthRape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN): $1,300 · HealthNAMI National: $850 · HealthTHE BRIDGE TO LIFE INC: $500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 · HealthJORDAN THOMAS FOUNDATION INC: $200 · Health+1 more: $150 · HealthGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $2,750 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $100 · Food & NutritionOPERATION SMILE INC: $1,100 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $250 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $200 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $150 · InternationalUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $1,700 · PhilanthropyHEARTS OF GOLD INC: $600 · PhilanthropyTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,700 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $100 · Civil Rights
Other$55,287Human Services$9,900Health$6,000Food & Nutrition$2,850International$2,700Philanthropy$2,300Civil Rights$1,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION: $2,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $2,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $1,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNew Alternatives for LGBT Homeless Youth Inc: $1,750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NESHAMAH INSTITUTE INC: $1,320 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN): $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COALITION FOR HOMELESS VETERANS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLauren's Kids Inc: $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFreedom Fund Network Inc: $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTS OF GOLD INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE TO LIFE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUREENS HAVEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHROUGH THESE DOORS: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe New School: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJORDAN THOMAS FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF ST EGIDIO USA INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way Miami IncJewish Communal FundAmerican Online Givin…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Pfizer Foundation…Network for GoodThe Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…Paypal Charitable Giv…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…
United Way Miami IncFL13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Miami Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Family of Samuel H Schwartz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Family of Samuel H Schwartz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Lauren's Kids Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Family of Samuel H Schwartz’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home