Skip to content

· Private foundation

Family Force Foundation

TO ENRICH THE LIVES OF CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE BY IMPROVING QUALITY OF LIFE AND EXPANDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE COMMUNITY TO GIVE THEIR TIME AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$22kHuman Services$21kCivil Rights$11kYouth Development$10kHealth$6kPhilanthropy$4kArts & Culture$3kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$695k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA FOR KIDS OF EAST TEXAS$6,500
MENTORING ALIANCE$5,000
HOPE HAVEN OF EAST TEXAS$5,000
THE FORGOTTEN INITIATIVE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CHILDREN'S VILLAGE$2,500
AZLEWAY CHILDREN'S SERVICES-YLER$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE FORGOTTEN INITIATIVE: $5k → 11%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $3k → 12%EAST TEXAS HUMAN NEEDS NETWORK: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
2
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
3
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
4
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
5
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
6
Casa of Deep East Texas Inc

Train volunteers to advocate for children in court directed foster care.

Crime & Legal
7
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
8
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
9
Texas Center for Child and Family Studies

To strengthen the lives of children and families.

Human Services
10
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
11
Northeast Texas Casa Inc

To work to ensure children receive the needed services to overcome abuse and neglect.

Civil Rights
12
Casa for Kids of South Central Texas Inc

To recruit, train and supervise volunteers that advocate in the best interests of abused and neglected children in court.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa for Kids of East Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Educational Radio Foundation of East Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALL SAINTS SCHOOL FUND FOUNDATION: $21,550 · OtherALL SAINTS SCHOOL FUND FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $5,150 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHINE: $5,000 · OtherSHINEIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED WAY TYLERSMITH COUNTY: $3,500 · OtherUNITED WAY TYLERSMITH COUNTYAZLEWAY CHILDREN'S SERVICES-YLER: $2,500 · OtherKVNE: $2,000 · Other+5 more: $3,538 · Other+5 moreCASA FOR KIDS OF EAST TEXAS INC: $10,527 · Civil RightsCASA FOR KIDS O…The Forgotten Initiative: $5,000 · Human ServicesThe Forgott…CHILDRENS VILLAGE AND FAMILY SERVICE: $2,500 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS V…EAST TEXAS HUMAN NEEDS NETWORK: $500 · Human ServicesEAST TEXAS …MENTORING ALLIANCE: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTAPKARD INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalEDUCATIONAL RADIO FOUNDATION OF EAST TEXAS: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$48,238Civil Rights$10,527Human Services$8,000Youth Development$5,000Crime & Legal$5,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASA FOR KIDS OF EAST TEXAS INC: $10,527 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMENTORING ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Forgotten Initiative: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTAPKARD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDRENS VILLAGE AND FAMILY SERVICE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHISTORIC TYLER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEDUCATIONAL RADIO FOUNDATION OF EAST TEXAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASA FOR KIDS OF EAST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTORING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds The Forgotten Initiative ↗
  • Who funds TAPKARD INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS VILLAGE AND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC TYLER INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL RADIO FOUNDATION OF EAST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS HUMAN NEEDS NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Texas Communities FoundationTX19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Texas Communities Foundation · Ben and Maytee Fisch Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Family Force Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Family Force Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Family Force Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Family Force Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Family Force’s filings →

    More from the funding graph