Skip to content

· Private foundation

Family Benevolent Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$129kReligion$77kEducation$60kFood & Nutrition$27kHealth$24kHuman Services$16kEmployment$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$614k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
New Life Lutheran Church$25,000
The Reehl Mission Vision$10,000
Concordia Univ Harvest Fund$3,500
Our Place$3,000
The Walker Borum Foundation$2,500
Concordia Univ Ch Worker Scholarship Endow$2,500
Concordia Univ Paul Scholars$2,000
Homestead Refuge$2,000
Our Community Salutes$1,000
Heartland Lutheran High School$1,000
Phils Friends$1,000
Dollywood Foundation Finance$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Homestead Refuge: $2k → 15%Operation BBQ Relief Inc: $1k → 5%Homestead Refuge: $2k → 15%Operation BBQ Relief Inc: $1k → 5%Maryland Living Center: $1k → 11%Maryland Living Center: $1k → 11%Maryland Living Center: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
IN
NJ
CA
NE
KS
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 32% of Family Benevolent Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Family Benevolent Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 28% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$321k · 21 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
12

Total granted

$321k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+231%

Still filing today

48%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OG
    ORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $54k · revenue +25%
  • PF
    PHIL'S FRIENDS NFP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +134%
  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2023 · $9k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • TH
    Topical Health Alliance
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • CT
    CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
His Healing Helping Hands Intl Ministries Inc

Support the needs of non-domestic Christian missions

International
2
Hospitality for Humanity Dba Instant Aid

Our mission is simple: make it easy to give back in ways that are effective, transparent and instant. our aim is to deliver "instant aid" with nutrient dense meals to communities facing crisis and protecting vulnerable children. we want to…

Human Services
3
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

—
4
Lifting Hands International

We provide aid to refugees, both at home and abroad. Simply humanitarian.

International
5
Refuge of Hope Ministries

Glorify and serve god by providing meals for hungry men, women, and children, emergency shelter and transition to independence for homeless men, and spiritual hope through jesus christ.

Religion
6
Love the Hungry Inc

The corporation is organized to provide nutritious fortified meals throughout the world to children and families that are most vunerable to hunger and malnutriion.

Food & Nutrition
7
Habitat for Humanity International of the Flathead Valley

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, community, and hope.

—
8
Hands Giving Hope

The Organization provides worldwide relief and aid to reduce human suffering as a result of hunger, poverty, war and natural disasters.

Food & Nutrition
9
Operation Compassion

To mobilize churches, individuals and community groups to provide food and basic necessities to the poor and needy around the world.

Religion
10
Hope Here International Ministries Inc

Aid to poverty stricken areas in the u.s. and abroad.

International
11
Help the Least of These Inc

Our mission is to promote the cause of christian religion; to engage people and resources to help the extreme poor in developing nations with a focus on orphans, health care, vocational training and spiritual growth.

International
12
World Orphans

World orphans vision is to empower the church to care for orphans and vulnerable families. we equip, inspire, and mobilize the church to care for orphans and vulnerable children. churches engaged. children restored. communities transformed…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Giving the Basics Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Reehl Mission Vision. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW LIFE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $74,800 · OtherNEW LIFE LUTHERAN CHURCHTropical Health Alliance: $24,200 · OtherTropical Health AllianceHearts and Hands Against Hunger: $22,420 · OtherHearts and Hands Against HungerConcordia Harvest Fund: $22,000 · OtherConcordia Harvest FundHeartland Lutheran High School: $13,000 · OtherHeartland Lutheran High SchoolZion Classical Academy: $8,000 · Other+20 more: $44,210 · Other+20 moreORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC: $54,360 · InternationalORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN …WORLD VISION INC: $4,820 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCThe Reehl Mission Vision: $35,000 · ReligionThe Reehl M…PHIL'S FRIENDS NFP: $19,000 · HealthANGELS AMONG US: $2,500 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $8,500 · EducationHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationHOMESTEAD REFUGE: $4,000 · Human ServicesCASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA: $2,660 · Human ServicesOPERATION BBQ RELIEF: $2,000 · Human ServicesTABLE GRACE MINISTRIES: $4,250 · Arts & CultureOUR COMMUNITY SALUTES USA INC: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$208,630International$59,180Religion$35,000Health$22,000Education$9,000Human Services$8,660Arts & Culture$4,250Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC: $54,360 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Reehl Mission Vision: $35,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetPHIL'S FRIENDS NFP: $19,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELP FOR HAITI INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $4,820 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTABLE GRACE MINISTRIES: $4,250 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetHOMESTEAD REFUGE: $4,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetCASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA: $2,660 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetANGELS AMONG US: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION BBQ RELIEF: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIVING THE BASICS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOUR COMMUNITY SALUTES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOLIDAY HEROES FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds The Reehl Mission Vision ↗
  • Who funds PHIL'S FRIENDS NFP ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HELP FOR HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds TABLE GRACE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HOMESTEAD REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS AMONG US ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION BBQ RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds GIVING THE BASICS INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR COMMUNITY SALUTES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HOLIDAY HEROES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

LeRoy Thom Jean Thom and T-L FoundationNE15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: LeRoy Thom Jean Thom and T-L Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Family Benevolent Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Family Benevolent Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Family Benevolent Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Family Benevolent Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Family Benevolent’s filings →

    More from the funding graph