Skip to content

· Private foundation

Faithful Servants Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2020
9
Grants FY2020
5
States reached
$914k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

80% of Faithful Servants Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Faithful Servants Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
5
’18
6
’19
6
’20
3
’21
2
’22
3
’23
2
’24
4
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$2.0MInternational$622kFood & Nutrition$200kReligion$184kEducation$161kEmployment$26kHealth$2k
02FY2020 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k5 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.2M
$7,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EFA Foundation$913,664
Dreams Will Come True Foundation$270,000
Bridges Community Church$70,000
First Baptist Church of Los Altos$21,000
SAGOS$7,000
Allegro Organizational Solutions$6,600
Individual grant recipient$3,600
World Vision$429
ChildFund International$363
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 43% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%EFA Foundation: $914k → 8%Bridges Community Church: $70k → 10%Rancho Bernado Community Presbyteri: $2k → 11%Dreams Will Come True Foundation: $270k → 14%Millennium Relief and Development S: $3k → 16%Pioneers: $4k → 13%Convoy of Hope: $200k → 15%Samaritans Purse: $300k → 21%Kingdom Incorporated Ministries: $500 → 8%University of Illinois Foundation: $750 → 19%ChildFund International: $2k → 9%Los Altos Christian School: $41k → 8%Rancho Bernado Community Presbyteri: $1k → 11%Allegro Organizational Solutions: $7k → 16%Pioneers: $2k → 13%ChildFund International: $823 → 9%Los Altos Christian School: $25k → 8%Allegro Organizational Solutions: $6k → 16%Pioneers: $1k → 13%ChildFund International: $768 → 9%Los Altos Christian School: $24k → 8%Allegro Organizational Solutions: $4k → 16%ChildFund International: $588 → 9%First Baptist Church of Los Altos: $21k → 8%Allegro Organizational Solutions: $4k → 16%ChildFund International: $443 → 9%First Baptist Church of Los Altos: $21k → 8%Allegro Organizational Solutions: $4k → 16%ChildFund International: $396 → 9%First Baptist Church of Los Altos: $20k → 8%Allegro Organizational Solutions: $3k → 16%ChildFund International: $396 → 9%Los Altos Christian School PTF: $20k → 8%Allegro Organizational Solutions: $2k → 16%ChildFund International: $363 → 9%Los Altos Christian School PTF: $20k → 8%ChildFund International: $99 → 9%Los Altos Christian School PTF: $20k → 8%First Baptist Church of Los Altos: $12k → 8%Los Altos Christian School: $10k → 8%First Baptist Church of Los Altos: $7k → 8%SAGOS: $7k → 8%Chinese Cancer Memorial Foundation: $2k → 8%Chinese Church in Christ CCIC: $12k → 8%Khan Academy: $166 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
CA
NE
MO
VA
NM
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 36% of Faithful Servants Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 48% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 19%.

Faithful Servants Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 35% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$318k · 9 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$318k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+49%

Still filing today

33%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $305k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionPhilanthropyInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    Los Altos Christian School
    4× · 2017–2021 · $100k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF LOS ALTOS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $81k
  • LA
    Los Altos Christian School PTF
    3× · 2017–2019 · $60k

Funded once

  • CC
    Chinese Church in Christ CCIC
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • MR
    Millennium Relief and Development S
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • CC
    CHINESE CANCER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -91%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
InitiativeGlobal

To join in the completion of the Great Commission through Scripture Engagement in all languages and every people group.

Religion
2
Childfund Alliance

Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…

International
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
4
Foreign Mission Foundation
—
5
Global United Foundation
International
6
Global Dmm
Religion
7
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
8
The International Foundation
—
9
World Education Fund
Education
10
World Family Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
12
Global Voice
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Efa Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,061,545 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCEFA FOUNDATION: $913,664 · PhilanthropyEFA FOUNDATION+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyDreams Will Come True Foundation: $270,000 · OtherDreams Will Come True …Los Altos Christian School: $100,275 · OtherLos Altos Christian Sc…FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF LOS ALTOS INC: $81,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH O…BRIDGES COMMUNITY CHURCH: $70,000 · OtherBRIDGES COMMUNITY CHUR…Los Altos Christian School PTF: $60,000 · OtherLos Altos Christian Sc…Individual grant recipient: $25,700 · Other+6 more: $30,800 · OtherSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $300,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S…+2 more: $12,000 · ReligionCONVOY OF HOPE: $200,000 · InternationalALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $29,500 · International+2 more: $12,642 · InternationalUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $750 · EducationKHAN ACADEMY INC: $166 · Education
Philanthropy$1,977,209Other$637,775Religion$312,000International$242,142Education$916

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,061,545 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDreams Will Come True Foundation: $270,000 over 1y, 69% of budgetALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $29,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGO LIVE SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $6,919 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $5,723 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE CANCER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $166 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds EFA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Dreams Will Come True Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds GO LIVE SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
  • Who funds REVELATION MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE CANCER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Faithful Servants Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Faithful Servants Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Faithful Servants Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Faithful Servants Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Faithful Servants’ filings →

    More from the funding graph