Skip to content
Factset Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Factset Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
54
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$410k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$3.3MYouth Development$1.2MPhilanthropy$794kEmployment$518kFood & Nutrition$346kInternational$311kEnvironment$297kPublic Safety & Disaster$225kOther$0
02FY2025 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $86k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $279k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.2M
$15,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICA ON TECH INC$410,000
UPREACH CHARITABLE COMPANY$255,000
THE BOTTOM LINE INC$250,000
SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY$250,000
The Girls Are Investors$249,682
Future 5$180,000
GIRLS WHO INVEST INC$175,000
GENERATION YOU EMPLOYED INC$155,000
TECHNOVATION$150,000
PHILIPPINE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION DBA PHILDEV$132,000
KIRON OPEN HIGHER EDUCATION GMBH$125,000
THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC$100,000
RISE AGAINST HUNGER$79,053
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$75,000
CHAPTER ONE NFP$70,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 83% of grant dollars ($6.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 17% that went abroad ($1.2M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $396k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $75k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $75k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $75k → 14%FILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $6k → 9%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $50k → 14%FILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $5k → 9%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $50k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $35k → 14%American Corporate Partners: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 17% of all-years giving ($1.2M)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$986k · 5 grants
Germany$250k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.1M · 52 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

52 repeat relationships: 46 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
18

Total granted

$6.1M
$201k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+4%

Still filing today

96%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $815k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    AMERICA ON TECH INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $985k · revenue +181%
  • T
    TECHNOVATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $459k · revenue +78%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2023–2025 · $225k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ADLER PLANETARIUM
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +17%
  • AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +3%
  • CY
    City Year New York
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
4
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc

The mission of the atlanta community food bank is to engage, educate and empower our community to fight hunger. our bold goal is to see that all people in our service area have access to the nutritious meals they need when they need them.

Food & Nutrition
6
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
8
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
9
Foodcorps Inc

Together with communities, foodcorps serves to connect kids to healthy food in schools.

Food & Nutrition
10
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
11
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
12
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Cares Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Adler Planetarium. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
68/68
Grantees still filing
43/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICA ON TECH INC: $985,000 · EducationAMERICA ON TECH INCSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC: $500,000 · EducationSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTU…THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 · EducationTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INCCHAPTER ONE NFP: $120,000 · EducationCHAPTER ONE NFPWORKING IN THE SCHOOLS INC: $110,000 · Education+4 more: $60,000 · EducationUPREACH CHARITABLE COMPANY: $667,000 · OtherUPREACH CHARITABLE COMPANYKIRON OPEN HIGHER EDUCATION GMBH: $250,000 · OtherKIRON OPEN HIGHER EDUCATION GMBHThe Girls Are Investors: $249,682 · OtherThe Girls Are InvestorsRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $163,553 · OtherRISE AGAINST HUNGER INCPHILIPPINE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION DBA PHILDEV USA: $132,000 · OtherPHILIPPINE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION DB…COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $96,000 · OtherGIRLS WHO INVEST INC: $175,000 · OtherGIRLS WHO INVEST INC+40 more: $607,807 · Other+40 moreGENERATION YOU EMPLOYED INC: $305,000 · Youth DevelopmentGENERATION Y…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $210,450 · Youth DevelopmentJUNIOR ACHIE…FUTURE 5 INC: $180,000 · Youth DevelopmentFUTURE 5 INCIMENTOR INC: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentIMENTOR INCAmerica Scores New England DBA Boston Scores: $29,250 · Youth Development+1 more: $16,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOTTOM LINE INC: $750,000 · Community ImprovementTHE BOTTOM L…CHICAGO CARES INC: $41,500 · Community Improvement+1 more: $4,025 · Community ImprovementTECHNOVATION: $458,500 · Science & TechFAIRFIELD COUNTY'S COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · Philanthropy911 DAY: $88,000 · PhilanthropyNEW YORK CARES INC: $79,000 · PhilanthropyONE TREE PLANTED INC: $60,000 · PhilanthropyHappy Hope Foundation Inc: $26,000 · PhilanthropyPERSON TO PERSON INC: $14,500 · Philanthropy+2 more: $19,700 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $225,347 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $135,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $11,000 · Human Services
Education$2,075,000Other$2,341,042Youth Development$801,200Community Improvement$795,525Science & Tech$458,500Philanthropy$412,200Human Services$396,347

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICA ON TECH INC: $985,000 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetTHE BOTTOM LINE INC: $750,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC: $500,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTECHNOVATION: $458,500 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetGENERATION YOU EMPLOYED INC: $305,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $225,347 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $210,450 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFUTURE 5 INC: $180,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetGIRLS WHO INVEST INC: $175,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $163,553 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $135,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRFIELD COUNTY'S COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHAPTER ONE NFP: $120,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWORKING IN THE SCHOOLS INC: $110,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $96,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget911 DAY: $88,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNEW YORK CARES INC: $79,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONE TREE PLANTED INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMENTOR INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO CARES INC: $41,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSAVE THE SOUND: $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADLER PLANETARIUM: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerica Scores New England DBA Boston Scores: $29,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHappy Hope Foundation Inc: $26,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $21,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNorwalk River Watershed Association Inc: $19,300 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetAUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS: $16,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBILLION OYSTER PROJECT INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANITARIAN OPENSTREETMAP TEAM UNITED STATES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPERSON TO PERSON INC: $14,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS FOR OUTDOOR COLORADO: $13,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetL A WORKS INC: $13,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCAROLINA FARM TRUST INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF YOUNGSTOWN AND THE MAHONING VALLEY: $12,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR HOSPITAL ART INC: $12,120 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $10,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetESPLANADE ASSOCIATION INC: $10,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSPOONFULS: $8,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Motorola Solutions Fo…Salesforce FoundationPwc Foundation IncThe Blackbaud Giving …Tides FoundationUnited Way WorldwideCharities Aid Foundat…The Pimco FoundationCharles Schwab Founda…Baird Foundation Inc
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA19.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Salesforce Foundation · Pwc Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Tides Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pimco Foundation · Charles Schwab Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Factset Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Factset Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Save the Sound: 37% of income from government
  • America Scores New England Dba Boston Scores: 30% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Homefront Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Friday Night Supper Program Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Person to Person Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Bottom Line Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Emerald Necklace Conservancy Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Factset Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Factset Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Factset’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home