Skip to content

· Private foundation

F G Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$89kHuman Services$20kPhilanthropy$16kHealth$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kFood & Nutrition$3kInternational$3kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$180
Median grant
6
States reached
$162k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNG ISRAEL OF WOODMERE$2,200
ACHIEZER$2,160
CONGREGATION TORAH OHR$1,700
CONGREGATION BAIS MEDRASH OF CEDARH$1,505
Special Childrens Center for Educat$500
Individual grant recipient$360
EN OD MILVADO FOUNDATION INC$360
HACHAIM VHASHALOM$260
ECHO-NATIONAL JEWISH INSTITUTE-HEAL$200
Metzad$200
YESHIVA BETH ABRAHAM$180
PEYLIM$180
SHOR YOSHUV INSTITUTE$100
SHARSHERET$100
Stand Up To Cancer$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $360 → 9%AVIGDORS HELPING HAND: $180 → 13%AVIGDORS HELPING HAND: $180 → 13%CHEVRA GEMACH: $640 → 20%CHEVRA GEMACH: $540 → 20%CHEVRA GEMACH: $430 → 20%ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $140 → 17%CHEVRA GEMACH: $260 → 20%CHEVRA GEMACH: $200 → 20%ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $50 → 17%ISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $36 → 17%CHEVRA GEMACH: $180 → 20%CHEVRA GEMACH: $150 → 20%EN OD MILVADO FOUNDATION INC: $360 → 20%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $100 → 6%ACHIEZER: $3k → 6%ACHIEZER: $3k → 6%ACHIEZER: $2k → 6%ACHIEZER: $2k → 6%ACHIEZER: $2k → 6%ACHIEZER: $2k → 6%ACHIEZER: $1k → 6%DOROT: $144 → 17%DOROT: $55 → 17%DOROT: $18 → 17%ATIME: $54 → 20%ACHIEZER: $360 → 6%Bonei Olam: $100 → 20%Bonei Olam: $100 → 20%PROJECT EZRA: $36 → 17%Bonei Olam: $100 → 20%Bonei Olam: $100 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$137k · 88 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

88 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 70 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

88
123

Total granted

$137k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+37%

Still filing today

38%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +58%
  • UE
    Upper East Side Hatzolah Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue +76%
  • TC
    THE CHEVRA GEMACH INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +657%

Funded once

  • KC
    KHAL CHASIDIM OF LAWRENCE
    one grant, 2020 · $850
  • TP
    THE PRESS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2024 · $540
  • CZ
    CONGREGATION ZICHRON ESTHER DEVORAH
    one grant, 2024 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
5
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
6
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
7
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
8
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
9
American Friends of Yeshiva High School of Kiryat Arba Inc

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide educational and social improvement for the children of kiryat arba, israel.

Philanthropy
10
Yad Vashem Usa Foundation

Yad vashem usa foundation (the organization) is dedicated to support the memorialization and awareness of, and education regarding, the holocaust, as currently overseen, supervised and conducted by yad vashem, the holocaust martyrs and…

Arts & Culture
11
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Menuchas Asher Csenger Inc

To promote, benefit, and support jewish educational activities in israel

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 220 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
85/89
Grantees still filing
67/89
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL: $18,928 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAELCONGREGATION BAIS MEDRASH OF CEDARH: $11,219 · OtherCONGREGATION BAIS MEDRASH OF CEDARHPARK EAST SYNAGOGUE: $10,606 · OtherPARK EAST SYNAGOGUEYESHIVA OF SOUTH SHORE: $9,482 · OtherYESHIVA OF SOUTH SHORECONGREGATION TORAH OHR INC: $7,330 · OtherCONGREGATION TORAH OHR INCIndividual grant recipient: $6,870 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHABAD OF THE FIVE TOWNS INC: $4,861 · OtherSHOR YOSHUV: $4,080 · Other+149 more: $43,768 · Other+149 moreACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $15,656 · Human ServicesACHIEZER COMMUN…THE CHEVRA GEMACH INC: $2,400 · Human ServicesTHE CHEVRA GEMA…+9 more: $2,113 · Human Services+9 moreUpper East Side Hatzolah Inc: $5,200 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $350 · HealthISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $316 · Health+9 more: $1,285 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $1,217 · ReligionYESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $360 · ReligionMOSDOS PNEI MENACHEM INC: $360 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $342 · ReligionFRIENDS OF HATZOLAH ASHDOD DAROM: $180 · ReligionMINCHAS ASHER FOUNDATION: $180 · Religion+1 more: $54 · ReligionSTAND UP TO CANCER: $1,040 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF ADERES HATORAH INC: $300 · PhilanthropyBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $198 · PhilanthropyHEBRON FUND INC: $188 · PhilanthropyJust One Chesed Inc: $180 · PhilanthropyFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $90 · Philanthropy+2 more: $85 · PhilanthropySIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $926 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $472 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $208 · Arts & CultureNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $1,090 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $200 · Animals
Other$117,144Human Services$20,169Health$7,151Religion$2,693Philanthropy$2,081Arts & Culture$1,606Animals$1,290

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $15,656 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUpper East Side Hatzolah Inc: $5,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHEVRA GEMACH INC: $2,400 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LEON MAYER FUND INC: $2,290 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetECHO NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH: $1,430 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $1,217 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $1,090 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTAND UP TO CANCER: $1,040 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $926 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD FIND OF AMERICA INC: $860 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $720 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS OF COURAGE INC: $677 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $472 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEN OD MILVADO FOUNDATION INC: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVIGDORS HELPING HAND INC: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOSDOS PNEI MENACHEM INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $342 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $324 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $316 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ADERES HATORAH INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $272 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS-YAD YESHAYA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $235 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL SPECIAL KIDS FUND: $226 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $217 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $208 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $198 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $188 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $185 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HATZOLAH ASHDOD DAROM: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN EZER LNEFESH: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJust One Chesed Inc: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINCHAS ASHER FOUNDATION: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $158 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION: $144 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SOUP KITCHENS INC: $126 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Upper East Side Hatzolah Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHEVRA GEMACH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEON MAYER FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ECHO NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds STAND UP TO CANCER ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD FIND OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS OF COURAGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY47.9× affinity47 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · The Setton Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · The J W Foundation · Alyad Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The Margules Foundation Inc · Ip Foundation · House of Gross Foundation Inc · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · Astar Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization F G Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from F G Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to F G Foundation?

Find your warmest path to F G Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 220 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on F G’s filings →

More from the funding graph