· Private foundation
Astar Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k90 grants · $73k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SHOR YOSHUV INSTITUTE | $40,230 |
| CONGREGATION KNESETH ISRAEL | $24,700 |
| JEWISH HERITAGE CENTER | $15,518 |
| AISH HATORAH OF CLEVELAND | $10,000 |
| PROJECT INSPIRE | $10,000 |
| SCRANTON HEBREW DAY SCHOOL | $6,250 |
| SUPPORTERS OF TORAH | $5,000 |
| MOSDOS BOTOSHAN | $3,652 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,600 |
| JOY | $2,860 |
| AL KANFEI NISHARIM | $2,650 |
| PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT | $2,480 |
| CONGREGATION KHAL MEVAKSHEI HASHEM | $2,333 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,180 |
| YESHIVA BETH MOSHE SCHOOL | $1,908 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
80 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 50 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC3× · 2022–2024 · $16k · revenue +63%
- AGAISH GLOBAL INC2× · 2022–2023 · $13k · revenue +32%
- HEHATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INC2× · 2022–2023 · $3k · revenue +99%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF OHR MOSHE MIAMIone grant, 2024 · $10k
- MYMESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLINone grant, 2023 · $10k
- AHAISH HATORAH OF CLEVELANDone grant, 2023 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious School
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Chesed Fund Limited. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 287 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PROJECT INSPIRE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds AISH GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAH AND TEFILAH RAMAT ESHKOL INC ↗
- Who funds SCRANTON HEBREW DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds OHR MEIR UBRACHA ↗
- Who funds AL KANFEI NISHARIM INC ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds HITMASRUT INC ↗
- Who funds HATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds TZEDAKAH TATZEEL MEMOVES INC ↗
- Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
- Who funds ORLANDO TORAH ACADEMY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alyad Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Basch Family Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Cross River Community Foundation · The Fishoff Family Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · The J W Foundation · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Astar Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc — 21% of income from government
- Chai 4EVER Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Astar Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Astar Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.