Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ezra Levin Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$16k
Granted FY2020
20
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$3k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

97% of Ezra Levin Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of East Central Illinois, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Ezra Levin Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $16k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

16
’17
11
’18
6
’19
9
’20
1
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Philanthropy$479kEducation$27kReligion$23kArts & Culture$5kHuman Services$4kFood & Nutrition$2kHealth$2kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2020 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRAHMANANDA SARASWATI YAGYA FOUNDATION$3,000
MAHARISHI GLOBAL ADMINISTRATION THROUGH NATURAL LAW$2,000
INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS BASE EDUCATION$1,840
IOWA CONTEMPORARY ART$1,500
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$1,250
UNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN$650
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS$650
CHAMPAIGN-URBANA JEWISH FEDERATION$600
EASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK$500
Individual grant recipient$500
FAMILY SERVICES$500
CHAMPAIGN-URBANA SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$500
DAILY BREAD SOUP KITCHEN$300
CRISIS NURSERY$300
CHAMPAIGN URBANA SYMPHONY AND SYMPHONY GUILD$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $800) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CUNNINGHAM CHILDREN'S HOME: $600 → 19%CUNNINGHAM CHILDREN'S HOME: $200 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$70k · 24 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2020, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
13

Total granted

$70k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+48%

Still filing today

42%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Illinois Foundation
    4× · 2017–2020 · $12k · revenue +127%
  • MI
    MAHARISHI INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +42%
  • PC
    PARKLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • C
    COMMUNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • RR
    RAJA RAAM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Municipal Employee's Credit Union

To give members the ability to control their financial destiny by providing members with the means to satisfy their needs for financial services in a comfortable family-like environment. in doing so, the credit union strives to maintain…

—
2
Community Shares of Illinois

Community shares of illinois represents a diverse group of charitites with a common mission, to make our world a better place. whether your passion is women's issues, protecting children, helping animals, promoting health care or curbing…

—
3
Citizens Utility Board

To promote the health, welfare and prosperity of all the citizens of illinois by ensuring effective and democratic representation of utility consumers.

—
4
Champaign-Urbana Kiwanis Club Welfare Foundation

For children to grow and learn through youth sports programs, tutoring, and other projects.

—
5
University of Illinois Alumni Association

The mission of the university of illinois alumni association is to enhance and advance the relationship between the university of illinois at urbana-champaign (the university) and all its alumni; to inspire lifelong loyalty and pride among…

—
6
Chicago Community Bond Fund

Ccbf pays bond for people charged with crimes in cook county, illinois. through a revolving fund, ccbf supports individuals whose communities cannot afford to pay the bonds themselves and who have been impacted by structural violence.

Crime & Legal
7
Countryside School of Champaign-Urbana Inc

To provide joy in learning with excellence in education.

Education
8
Chicago Charter School Foundation

Our vibrant network of diverse chicago charter schools enables students to thrive every day, puts them on a path to success in college and life, and empowers entrepreneurial educators to pursue excellence through innovation.

Education
9
Champaign County Community Development Corporation

Economic development within champaign county, il and surrounding communities

—
10
Change Illinois Action Fund

Change illinois action fund is dedicated to advocating for solutions to the issues that undermine democracy and government efficiency in illinois, including restricted ballot access, uncompetitive elections, decreased citizen…

—
11
Children's Advocates for Change

Children's advocates for change was organized to improve the lives of children in illinois by bringing about significant changes public policies and programs for children through research, policy analysis and advocacy, public education and…

Human Services
12
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Don Moyer Boys & Girls Club; the most unlike its peers is David Lynch Foundation for Consciousness -Based Education and World Peace. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $473,103 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS+2 more: $1,500 · PhilanthropySINAI TEMPLE: $17,822 · OtherSINAI TEMPLEIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual g…Individual grant recipient: $7,215 · OtherIndividual g…COMMUNIVERSITY: $6,000 · OtherCOMMUNIVERSI…+25 more: $24,290 · Other+25 moreUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $11,850 · EducationMAHARISHI INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationCHAMPAIGN-URBANA SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,300 · EducationPARKLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,100 · EducationTHE READING GROUP: $600 · EducationBRAHMANANDA SARASWATI YAGYA FOUNDATION: $3,000 · ReligionCHAMPAIGN-URBANA JEWISH FEDERATION: $2,800 · ReligionDAILY BREAD SOUP KITCHEN INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionEASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK: $1,000 · Food & NutritionCHAMPAIGN-URBANA BALLET: $800 · Arts & CultureCUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME OF URBANA IL: $800 · Human Services
Philanthropy$474,603Other$64,327Education$17,850Religion$5,800Food & Nutrition$2,000Arts & Culture$800Human Services$800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $473,103 over 5y, 14% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $11,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRAHMANANDA SARASWATI YAGYA FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAHARISHI INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPAIGN-URBANA JEWISH FEDERATION: $2,800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHAMPAIGN-URBANA SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARKLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAILY BREAD SOUP KITCHEN INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPAIGN-URBANA BALLET: $800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME OF URBANA IL: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY: $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPAIGN COUNTY CASA INC: $700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE READING GROUP: $600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BRAHMANANDA SARASWATI YAGYA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAHARISHI INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPAIGN-URBANA JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPAIGN-URBANA SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARKLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DAILY BREAD SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN ILLINOIS FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPAIGN-URBANA BALLET ↗
  • Who funds CUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME OF URBANA IL ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPAIGN COUNTY CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE READING GROUP ↗
  • Who funds DAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds DON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wgrc IncIL28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wgrc Inc · Community Foundation of East Central Illinois · Iroquois Federal Foundation Inc · United Way of Champaign County · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Meyer Charitable Foundation · The Carle Foundation Hospital · American Water Charitable Foundationinc · Hartmann Family Foundation · Raynie Foundation · Donnini-Rudolph Family Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ezra Levin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ezra Levin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ezra Levin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph