Skip to content

· Private foundation

Exxonmobil Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21M
Granted FY2024still arriving
66
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$6.8M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$76MInternational$21MYouth Development$12MPhilanthropy$9.1MEnvironment$5.3MRecreation & Sports$3.1MAnimals$1.6MScience & Tech$1.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 66 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k39 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+13 grants · $19M
$4,200
Median grant
15
States reached
$78M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KHAN ACADEMY INC$6,846,730
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA CAF AMERICA$3,688,864
IWOKRAMA INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR RAINFOREST CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT$2,500,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER HOUSTON$1,300,000
THE EMC FOUNDATION INC$1,000,000
EDUCATIONAL MATCHING GIFT$993,238
CHERIE BLAIR FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN$600,000
COUNTERPART INTERNATIONAL INC$500,000
FRIENDS OF PANAFRICARE INC$350,000
CLARISSE MACHANGUANA FOUNDATION$300,000
FUNDACAO MECANISMO DE APOIO A SOCIEDADE CIVIL MASC$300,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC$300,000
UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT$250,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER BAYTOWN AREA AND CHAMBERS COUNTY$230,000
SOLAR SISTER INC$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $369k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES: $4k → 9%Bakerripley: $4k → 9%Houstons Amazing Place Inc: $4k → 16%Center For Global Development: $200k → 14%HOUSTONS AMAZING PLACE INC: $4k → 16%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $5k → 14%Houstons Amazing Place Inc: $3k → 16%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $5k → 14%Center for Global Development: $100k → 14%Women Home: $4k → 16%Women Home: $3k → 16%Bel Inizio: $3k → 16%Chinese Community Center: $4k → 16%Chinese Community Center: $3k → 16%MEMORIAL ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $4k → 16%Memorial Assistance Ministries: $3k → 16%KIDS MEALS INC: $4k → 16%Local Infant Formula for Emergency: $4k → 16%LOCAL INFANT FORMULA FOR EMERGENCIES INC: $4k → 16%Local Infant Formula for Emergency: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NH
WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
WY
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
DC
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Exxonmobil Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Exxonmobil Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$108M · 69 repeat orgs$19M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

69 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

69
63

Total granted

$108M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+8%

Still filing today

65%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KA
    KHAN ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $14M · revenue +20%
  • United Way of Greater Houston
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5.2M · revenue +24%
  • GS
    GRASSROOT SOCCER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • VI
    Volunteer Involvement Program
    one grant, 2020 · $3.2M
  • A
    AFRICARE
    one grant, 2020 · $1.1M · revenue -69%
  • JH
    John Hopkins University
    one grant, 2020 · $600k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
2
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
3
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
4
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
5
Community Information Now

Community information now (cinow) provides data, tools, analysis, and training to inform decisions to improve texas communities. cinow's vision is improved lives and decreased disparities through democratized data.

Community Improvement
6
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
7
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
8
The Women's Resource of Greater Houston

See Schedule OThe Women's Resource of Greater Houston helps women and girls make choices toward becoming independent, productive, and financially stable. We fulfill our mission by recruiting volunteer instructors to deliver our programs in…

Philanthropy
9
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
10
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teach for All Inc; the most unlike its peers is Solar Sister Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

110 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 110 of the 175 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
109/110
Grantees still filing
63/110
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Educational Matching Gift Program: $54,155,254 · OtherEducational Matching Gift ProgramVolunteer Inlvolvement Program: $8,552,343 · OtherVolunteer Inlvolvement ProgramIwokrama International Centre: $5,565,000 · OtherIwokrama International CentreVolunteer Involvement Program: $3,169,545 · Other+114 more: $21,267,476 · Other+114 moreKHAN ACADEMY INC: $13,556,730 · EducationKHAN ACADEMY IN…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,300,000 · EducationPresident and F…TEACH FOR ALL INC: $1,000,000 · EducationTEACH FOR ALL I…+15 more: $1,996,450 · Education+15 moreUnited Way of Greater Houston: $5,230,045 · PhilanthropyUnited Wa…CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $4,088,864 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES…KICKSTART INTERNATIONAL INC: $400,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF HUNTERDON COUNTY: $384,000 · Philanthropy+13 more: $818,550 · Philanthropy+13 moreCOUNTERPART INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,508,050 · InternationalTECHNOSERVE INC: $1,100,000 · InternationalSOLAR SISTER INC: $1,000,000 · InternationalKOPERNIK SOLUTIONS: $1,000,000 · InternationalJunior Achievement of Southeast Texas Inc: $300,000 · InternationalOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $300,000 · International+7 more: $605,000 · InternationalGRASSROOT SOCCER INC: $2,750,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $350,000 · Recreation & SportsTEXAS STATE AQUARIUM ASSOCIATION: $500,000 · AnimalsGIANT SABLE FUND: $120,000 · AnimalsCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $500,000 · EnvironmentBuffalo Bayou Partnership Inc: $50,000 · Environment+3 more: $22,300 · Environment
Other$92,709,618Education$17,853,180Philanthropy$10,921,459International$6,813,050Recreation & Sports$3,100,000Animals$620,000Environment$572,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $13,556,730 over 2y, 24% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston: $5,230,045 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $4,088,864 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGRASSROOT SOCCER INC: $2,750,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetCOUNTERPART INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,508,050 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,300,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTECHNOSERVE INC: $1,100,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSOLAR SISTER INC: $1,000,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetTEACH FOR ALL INC: $1,000,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTEXAS STATE AQUARIUM ASSOCIATION: $500,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $484,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS: $450,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetKICKSTART INTERNATIONAL INC: $400,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES: $400,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $400,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF HUNTERDON COUNTY: $384,000 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetNATIONAL SCIENCE TEACHING ASSOCIATION: $350,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $350,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $300,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJunior Achievement of Southeast Texas Inc: $300,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCAPITAL AREA UNITED WAY: $290,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER BAYTOWN AREA AND CHAMBERS COUNTY: $230,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATH: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ANCHORAGE: $135,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WILL COUNTY: $135,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BEAUMONT & NORTH JEFFERSON COUNTY: $130,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetGood Reason Houston Inc: $125,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGIANT SABLE FUND: $120,000 over 3y, 44% of budgetRebuilding Together Houston: $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTRANSMIT RECEIVE LABS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACTION COUNCIL FOR MINORITIES IN ENGINEERING INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWOMEN'S WORLD BANKING INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBuffalo Bayou Partnership Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY INC: $39,600 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE COASTAL BEND INC: $32,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Greater Houston ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOT SOCCER INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNTERPART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds TECHNOSERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICARE ↗
  • Who funds SOLAR SISTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KOPERNIK SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds TEACH FOR ALL INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS STATE AQUARIUM ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS ↗
  • Who funds KICKSTART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF HUNTERDON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SCIENCE TEACHING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds Junior Achievement of Southeast Texas Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX48.7× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Strake Foundation · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Houston · The Methodist Hospital · The William Stamps Farish Fund · The Powell Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Exxonmobil Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Exxonmobil Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • United Way of Hunterdon County: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • United Way of West Florida Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Exxonmobil Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Exxonmobil Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 175 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Exxonmobil’s filings →

More from the funding graph