· Public charity
Executive Council Charities
To raise funds through signature events and an annual campaign, and then provide grants to programs and non-profit organizations focuses on helping youth in arizona overcome obstacles and reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 69 grants below total $1,929,589 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,246,635 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $317,046 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $125k
- $10k–50k44 grants · $988k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $816k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OCJ KIDS | $186,813 |
| CHILD CRISIS CENTER | $161,430 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SCOTTSDALE INC | $100,000 |
| HARVEST COMPASSION CENTER | $92,108 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA | $80,177 |
| ARIZONA CANCER FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN | $73,622 |
| NEW PATHWAYS FOR YOUTH | $63,739 |
| ELEVATE PHOENIX | $58,142 |
| FOSTERING HEROES FOUNDATION | $47,762 |
| ARIZONA FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOUNDATION | $44,554 |
| ARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION | $39,418 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICE | $39,115 |
| ARIZONA ASSOCIATION FOR FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE PARENTS | $36,438 |
| AID TO ADOPTION OF SPECIAL KIDS | $33,666 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES | $33,632 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
75 repeat relationships — 55 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $278k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OKOCJ KIDS9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +155% · 26% of their budget
- AYASPIRING YOUTH ACADEMY9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +388% · 97% of their budget
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +103%
Funded once
- MUMESA UNITED WAY INCone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -41%
- KIKids in Focusone grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%
- SASOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $22k · revenue +50%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.
The mission of arizona's children association is to protect children, empower youth, and strengthen families.
We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.
To advance hope, healing and the best healthcare for children and their families.
Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.
The children's clinics provides a family centered comprehensive medical home to meet the special needs of children and families.
Horizon health and wellness inc's mission is to provide strength-based, culturally sensitive integrated health services by partnering with families and individuals to manage challenges and support their recovery. hhw developed an (cont'd…
The mission of the chidrens advocacy center of southern arizona is to provide a safe, compassionate, healing environment for children who have been a victim or witnessed a crime. vision: provide each child with the safety they need to tell…
Improving the health and well-being of children and families in a safe environment through mental health services, education and awareness.
Our mission is to help as many families as possible with individualized supports. The Organization's vision is to help families statewide with comprehensive support services for all ages. In carrying out its mission, the Organization's…
It is the mission of Arizona Faith and Families to recruit foster and adoptive parents from within the Christian church, to train and license them within a biblical world view, and to equip them to serve their Savior, home, church, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Firm Foundation Youth Homes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jacobs Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OCJ KIDS ↗
- Who funds ASPIRING YOUTH ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE INC ↗
- Who funds Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds New Pathways For Youth ↗
- Who funds ECC ENDOWMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOSTER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA BURN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AID TO ADOPTION OF SPECIAL KIDS AASK ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds Arizona Association for Foster and Adoptive Parents ↗
- Who funds Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds SAVING AMY INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds ELEVATE PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Hope Ignites Phoenix ↗
- Who funds THE PACE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds RYAN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ACCEL ↗
- Who funds NORTH PHOENIX KIWANIS FOUNDATION IN ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds ONWARD HOPE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds ORAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE LEAGUE OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds THUNDERBIRDS CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds FOSTERING HEROES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds AMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS ↗
- Who funds FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Good Works Project ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Thunderbirds Charities · Arizona Community Foundation · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · Fiesta Events Inc · John F Long Foundation Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · American Express Foundation · Saguaros Childrens Charities · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · BHHS Legacy Foundation · Valley of the Sun United Way
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Executive Council Charities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Executive Council Charities?
Find your warmest path to Executive Council Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.