Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ever Giving Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$99k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

International$117kHuman Services$112kReligion$68kEducation$39kPhilanthropy$24kCommunity Improvement$24kHealth$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$500
Median grant
9
States reached
$57k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Darussalaam Foundation$16,000
Beacon Fund$10,400
Renaissance Education Foundation$10,000
ACJU$9,836
Individual grant recipient$6,259
Mohammed Isfar Mohammed Azhar$5,920
Individual grant recipient$5,273
Mohamad Jaleel Abdul Halik$5,250
Georgetown Islamic Center$5,200
Mercy Foundation$5,010
Individual grant recipient$3,300
Individual grant recipient$2,625
Miftaah Institute$2,500
Islamic Center of Hawthorne$2,400
Islamic Center of Pflugerville$1,680
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 53% of grant dollars ($216k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 47% that went abroad ($194k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Texas Islamic Community Center: $500 → 8%Darul Quran Academy: $100 → 8%Helping Hand Relief and Development: $2k → 8%Helping Hand for Relief and Develop: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
CA
VA
AZ
KS
AR
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 47% of all-years giving ($194k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Sri Lanka$113k · 16 grants
Afghanistan$80k · 9 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$331k · 30 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
52

Total granted

$331k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+30%

Still filing today

13%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionHealthYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2022–2025 · $55k
  • DF
    DARUSSALAM FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $40k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2021–2025 · $34k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • MY
    MASJID YASEEN
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hamzah Islamic Center Inc

Practice and education of Islam

Religion
2
Dallas Islamic Foundation
Religion
3
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
4
Masjid Al-Rahma Inc

Exchage education and cultural values

Religion
5
Masjid Rahmatulilalamen Inc

Religious organization

Religion
6
Muna Center of Georgia Inc

Religious institute

Religion
7
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
8
Islamic Association of texas Inc

Provide a peaceful place of prayer for the local community and helping those in need with human essentials.

Religion
9
Muslim Response Usa for Relief and Development

To provide material and financial assistance to relieve the sufferings of any and all persons affected by disasters. conflicts, disease. and hunger, irrespective of race. creed or ethnicity. To support schools and other learning centers…

International
10
Rahmat-E-Alam Foundation

The mission of rahmat-e-alam is to enlighten humanity with the authentic knowledge of islam.

Religion
11
Tawheed Foundation for Knowledge & Development Inc

Organize religious classes by scholars Via Zoom, teleconference, seminars Provide financial help on humanitarian ground Distribute printed books, materials posting YouTube lectures. To sustain our services , actualize our vision , our…

Religion
12
San Francisco Muslim Community Center

Serving Church Members to find solace

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helping Hand for Relief and Development Inc; the most unlike its peers is Arkansas Chapter of the Construction Financial Management. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $55,171 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDARUSSALAM FOUNDATION: $40,020 · OtherDARUSSALAM FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $33,864 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $30,196 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMohammed Isfar Mohammed Azhar: $22,940 · OtherMohammed Isfar Mohammed AzharBeacon Fund: $19,400 · OtherMohamad Jaleel Abdul Halik: $17,600 · OtherGEORGETOWN ISLAMIC CENTER INC: $15,200 · OtherMohamed Jaleel Abdul Halik: $13,999 · Other+77 more: $125,395 · Other+77 moreRenaissance Education Foundation: $15,400 · Youth DevelopmentTHE MERCY FOUNDATION INC: $13,710 · Religion+1 more: $100 · ReligionHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,950 · Human ServicesTEXAS ISLAMIC COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 · Human ServicesDARUL QURAN ACADEMY INC: $100 · Human ServicesLIFE FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $2,400 · InternationalHELPING BLIND PEOPLE INC: $889 · EducationREACH EDUCATION FUND: $500 · EducationSEMA US INC: $500 · HealthMUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA: $250 · Civil Rights
Other$373,785Youth Development$15,400Religion$13,810Human Services$2,550International$2,400Education$1,389Health$500Civil Rights$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRenaissance Education Foundation: $15,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MERCY FOUNDATION INC: $13,710 over 2y, 11% of budgetLIFE FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING BLIND PEOPLE INC: $889 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetREACH EDUCATION FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMA US INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSachse Muslim Society: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Renaissance Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE MERCY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Muslim Community FoundationCA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Dearborn Community Center · Texas Instruments Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ever Giving Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ever Giving Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 97 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ever Giving’s filings →

    More from the funding graph