· Private foundation
Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k90 grants · $169k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $440k
- $250k+1 grant · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY | $400,000 |
| FROEDTERT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $240,000 |
| MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN | $200,000 |
| MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION | $8,500 |
| RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER | $7,000 |
| HUNGER TASK FORCE | $5,000 |
| MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION | $5,000 |
| HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC | $5,000 |
| THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF WAUKESHA | $5,000 |
| WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY | $4,500 |
| SOJOURNER FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| AUDIO & BRAILLE LITERACY ENHANCEMENT (AB | $2,500 |
| YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MILWAUKEE | $2,500 |
| UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $262k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
175 repeat relationships — 76 still active in FY2025, 99 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $669k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WPWISCONSIN PRESERVATION FUND INC3× · 2020–2022 · $600k · revenue +379%
- TMTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC2× · 2020–2025 · $210k · revenue +37%
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC4× · 2020–2023 · $115k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- HHHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Incgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $1.0M · revenue +64%
- VCVARIOUS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONSone grant, 2019 · $927k
- FAFROEDTERT AND THE MEDICAL COLLEGEone grant, 2022 · $103k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…
Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.
To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.
Making the arts accessible to all
The milwaukee community service corps (mcsc) is a non-profit vocational training organization providing employment, education and life skills to training youth adults and unemployed and underemployed of milwaukee, wisconsin.
The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.
Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.
Milwaukee water commons is helping catalyze milwaukee as a true model water city-a place where we all have a stake in the health of our waters and all share in their stewardship and benefits. we are advancing our community envisioned water…
Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.
The mission of employ milwaukee, inc. is to build a strong workforce development system by planning, coordinating, collaborating and monitoring workforce initiatives with businesses, partners and community stakeholders at the local,…
To advance progressive values, ideas and policies through research, policy, networking, advocacy and public education.
Wisconsin progress recruits, trains, elects, and develops progressive candidates and leaders at the local and state legislative levels.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Center for Independence Inc and the most unlike its peers is Feast of Crispian. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
174 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 174 of the 285 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN PRESERVATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Marquette University ↗
- Who funds Froedtert Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds ADAPTIVE COMMUNITY APPROACH PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds JUST ONE MORE MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC ↗
- Who funds HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds MacCANON BROWN HOMELESS SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds Hope Center Inc ↗
- Who funds REPAIRERS OF THE BREACH INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Milwaukee Inc ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ELM GROVE LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds Prevent Blindness Wisconsin ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Youth Foundation Inc · Gardner Foundation · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Bert L and Patricia S Steigleder Charitable · Waukesha County Community Foundation · The Ros Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.