Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eva and Louis Galpern Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$527k
Granted FY2023
21
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$241k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$968kReligion$650kInternational$100kArts & Culture$87kHealth$69kHuman Services$30kCivil Rights$12kEducation$8kOther$0
02FY2023 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k11 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $178k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $308k
$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$241,254
CHAI LIFELINE INC$67,229
CHABAD ISRAEL CENTER$45,000
HAMPTON SYNAGOGUE$38,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$25,000
NATIONAL YIDDISH THEATER$24,710
Individual grant recipient$13,980
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$11,500
CHABAD OF VIRGINIA$10,000
BELEV ECHAD$10,000
OUR PLACE NY$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,400
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND$5,000
KINGS PARK JEWISH CENTER$5,000
THE JEWISH EDUCATION PROJECT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OUR PLACE NY: $6k → 17%OUR PLACE NY: $6k → 17%OUR PLACE NY: $5k → 17%BELEV ECHAD: $10k → 17%BELEV ECHAD: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 30 repeat orgs$171k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
24

Total granted

$1.7M
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+38%

Still filing today

27%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
ReligionEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $965k · revenue +39%
  • RH
    Richmond Hebrew Day School
    5× · 2017–2021 · $128k · revenue +114%
  • OP
    OUR PLACE IN NY INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $17k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • KT
    KHAL TORATH CHAIM VIZNITZ OF BP
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • MI
    MACHNE ISRAEL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • YC
    YESHIVAH CHOFETZ CHAIM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
6
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
7
Us Israel Education Fund Inc
—
8
Israel Initiative 2020 Inc
International
9
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
10
Bais Yisrael Foundation
—
11
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Yad Laniyim
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pef Israel Endowment Funds Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sparks of Daas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $965,459 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES …+2 more: $12,500 · PhilanthropyWESTHAMPTON SYNAGOGUE INC: $118,800 · OtherWESTHAMPTON SYNAGOGUE INCCHABAD ISRAEL CENTER INC: $105,000 · OtherCHABAD ISRAEL CENTER INCNATIONAL YIDDISH THEATER: $70,710 · OtherNATIONAL YIDDISH THEATERCONGREGATION TOLDOS AVTUM YITZCHOK: $50,000 · OtherCONGREGATION TOLDOS AVTUM YITZCHOKCHABAD OF VIRGINIA: $35,100 · OtherCHABAD OF VIRGINIAYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH: $29,100 · Other+40 more: $195,508 · Other+40 moreRichmond Hebrew Day School: $128,000 · Education+2 more: $3,780 · EducationJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $90,126 · InternationalCHAI LIFELINE INC: $67,229 · Health+1 more: $1,800 · HealthOUR PLACE IN NY INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesBELEV ECHAD INC: $13,220 · Human ServicesLIMMUD FSU INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $11,000 · ReligionKEHILAT ZWEHIL INC: $5,400 · ReligionBOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION INC: $5,000 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $2,000 · ReligionFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $11,500 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$977,959Other$604,218Education$131,780International$90,126Health$69,029Human Services$30,220Religion$23,400Arts & Culture$11,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $965,459 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRichmond Hebrew Day School: $128,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $90,126 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $67,229 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOUR PLACE IN NY INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBELEV ECHAD INC: $13,220 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $11,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIMMUD FSU INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEHILAT ZWEHIL INC: $5,400 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPARKS OF DAAS INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ISRAEL INDEPENDENCE FUND: $2,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELLIE RUBY FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE QUEENS LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAS KESSER YONAH: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Richmond Hebrew Day School ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR PLACE IN NY INC ↗
  • Who funds BELEV ECHAD INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds LIMMUD FSU INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds KEHILAT ZWEHIL INC ↗
  • Who funds BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPARKS OF DAAS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY23.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Stuart and Judith Rosen Foundation · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · The Ojc Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eva and Louis Galpern Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eva and Louis Galpern Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eva and Louis Galpern’s filings →

    More from the funding graph