How much does Euler-Revaz Family Foundation give?

Euler-Revaz Family Foundation reported 30 grants totaling $34,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 23 and 27 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.

What does Euler-Revaz Family Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (75%), Arts & Culture (18%), Animals (3%).

Who are Euler-Revaz Family Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Bayside Historical Society ($14k), Queens Historical Society ($7k), The Alliance for Climate Protection ($6k).

Does Euler-Revaz Family Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 11% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Euler-Revaz Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as Euler-Revaz Family Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jpmorgan Chase Foundation, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.

Where is Euler-Revaz Family Foundation based?

Euler-Revaz Family Foundation is based in NY.

Euler-Revaz Family Foundation

Euler-Revaz Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Euler-Revaz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$34k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$2k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$134kArts & Culture$33kAnimals$6kFood & Nutrition$6k

02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$326k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
BAYSIDE HISTORICAL SOCIETY	$2,000
SAVE THE SOUND	$2,000
HISTORIC DISTRICTS COUNCIL	$2,000
POPPENHUSEN INSTITUTE	$2,000
RIVERKEEPER	$1,000
SIERRA CLUB NYC GROUP	$1,000
EVERYBODY SOLAR	$1,000
KING MANOR ASSOCIATES	$1,000
NYC BIRD ALLIANCE	$1,000
QUEENS HISTORICAL SOCIETY	$1,000
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES OF NY	$1,000
EARTH JUSTICE	$1,000
FOOD AND WATER WATCH	$1,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND	$1,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY	$1,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$171k · 28 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$171k

$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%

+173%

Still filing today

64%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EnvironmentHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BH
BAYSIDE HISTORICAL SOCIETY
6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +35%
TA
THE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION
6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +10%
EA
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES NY INC
6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +45%

Funded once

PA
Pesticide Action Network North America
one grant, 2025 · $1k · revenue 0%
PP
Pollinator Partnershipgraduated
one grant, 2025 · $1k · revenue +173%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Environment Now

—

Advocates for Climate Innovation

Philanthropy

Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment

Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment

International Council On Environmental Economics and Development Union

Human Services

Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education

Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals

Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment

The 5 Gyres Institute

The 5 Gyres Institute (5 Gyres) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization based in Los Angeles, with a global network of supporters united in the pursuit of a planet free of plastic pollution. 5 Gyres' mission is to empower action against the…

—

Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment

The International Dark-Sky Association Inc

Darksky international restores the nighttime environment and protects communities from the harmful effects of light pollution through outreach, advocacy, and conservation.

—

The Ohio Environmental Council

To protect the environment and health of all ohio communities through legal and policy advocacy, decision-maker accountability, and civic engagement.

Environment

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the Earth; the most unlike its peers is Voelker Orth Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

21/21

Grantees still filing

16/21

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Environment$78,000Other$62,000Health$14,000Arts & Culture$7,000Philanthropy$6,000Animals$6,000Food & Nutrition$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY10.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Euler-Revaz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Euler-Revaz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Euler-Revaz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home