Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Eugenie S Wright Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$48kHealth$47kHousing & Shelter$9kEducation$6kYouth Development$6kArts & Culture$5kRecreation & Sports$5kCommunity Improvement$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$548k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE COUNSELING CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
WASHINGTONVILLE HOUSING ALLIANCE$1,300
ST THOMAS CHURCH$1,250
ST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,000
BARRY AVENUE AME ZION CHURCH$1,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$1,000
MAMARONECK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,000
LARCHMONT MAMARONECK LOCAL SUMMIT$500
TRINITY PAWLING SCHOOL$500
BROWN UNIVERSITY$500
HARBOR ISLAND CONSERVANCY$250
NATIONAL MARITIME HISTORIC SOCIETY$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%KEEPS INC: $1k → 9%KEEPS INC: $1k → 9%KEEPS INC: $1k → 9%KEEPS INC: $1k → 9%KEEPS INC: $1k → 9%AT HOME ON THE SOUND: $500 → 9%AT HOME ON THE SOUND: $500 → 9%AT HOME ON THE SOUND: $400 → 9%AT HOME ON THE SOUND: $400 → 9%AT HOME ON THE SOUND: $400 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$144k · 19 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$144k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+15%

Still filing today

47%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationEnvironmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE COUNSELING CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $47k · revenue +215%
  • WH
    Washingtonville Housing Alliance
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +34%
  • TS
    TRINITY-PAWLING SCHOOL CORPORATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $4k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • ET
    EMELIN THEATER
    one grant, 2019 · $600
  • LH
    Larchmont-Mamaroneck Hunger Task Force Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue -49%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $250

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Preserve Larchmont Inc

Historical preservation in Larchmont NY

Arts & Culture
2
Winchester Historical Society
3
Walton Historical Society

Preserve the history of walton through preservation of documents photos genealogy artifacts. the society publishes of local history interets related to the history of walton ny

Unclassified
4
Sharon Historical Society-Sharon Springs New York Inc

The mission of the Sharon Historical Society is to make all people aware of our history by linking the past with the present in order to inform them of our future. The Sharon Historical Society exists to inspire people's understanding that…

Arts & Culture
5
Westchester County Historical Society

To collect and preserve books, pamphlets, maps, manuscripts, photographs, newspapers, periodicals, film, video and digital materials pertaining to the history of Westchester County, to promote the knowledge and understanding of that…

Arts & Culture
6
The Northport Historical Society and Museum

Education and preservation of historical items relevant to northport, new york and its immediate surrounding area.

Arts & Culture
7
One Larchmont Inc

Funding preservation and beautification projects in Larchmont NY

Environment
8
The Longmeadow Historical Society

To preserve our towns history

Arts & Culture
9
Wilmington Historical Society

To preserve all documents to educate, engage and inform the residents and visitors concerning Wilmington, the Whiteface Mountain Region and the Adirondack community.

Arts & Culture
10
Harvard Historical Society

To collect and preserve historical material and artifacts, to encourage research into local history and to offer historical education opportunities to the community

Arts & Culture
11
Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc
Arts & Culture
12
Amityville Historical Society

To preserve and promote the history of the village of amityville and preserve significant artifacts

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mamaroneck Historical Society and the most unlike its peers is Keeps Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $15,716 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH — $12,250 · OtherST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCHFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH — $10,500 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHWashingtonville Housing Alliance — $9,460 · OtherWashingtonville Housing AllianceST THOMAS CHURCH — $9,150 · OtherST THOMAS CHURCHMAMARONECK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $8,000 · OtherMAMARONECK UNITED METHODIST CHURCHBARRY AVENUE AME ZION CHURCH — $8,000 · OtherBARRY AVENUE AME ZION CHURCHBROWN UNIVERSITY SPORTS FOUNDATION — $3,250 · Other+15 more — $10,477 · Other+15 moreFRIENDS OF THE COUNSELING CENTER — $47,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE COUNSELING CENTERKEEPS INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesAT HOME ON THE SOUND INC — $2,200 · Human ServicesTRINITY-PAWLING SCHOOL CORPORATION — $3,500 · EducationHARBOR ISLAND CONSERVANCY INC — $1,300 · EnvironmentTHE JAY HERITAGE CENTER — $500 · Arts & CultureLarchmont-Mamaroneck Hunger Task Force Inc — $500 · Philanthropy
Other$86,803Health$47,000Human Services$7,700Education$3,500Environment$1,300Arts & Culture$500Philanthropy$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE COUNSELING CENTER — $47,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetWashingtonville Housing Alliance — $9,460 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetKEEPS INC — $5,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTRINITY-PAWLING SCHOOL CORPORATION — $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAT HOME ON THE SOUND INC — $2,200 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL MARITIME HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHARBOR ISLAND CONSERVANCY INC — $1,300 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetLARCHMONT HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $700 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE JAY HERITAGE CENTER — $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLarchmont-Mamaroneck Hunger Task Force Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE COUNSELING CENTER
  • Who funds Washingtonville Housing Alliance
  • Who funds KEEPS INC
  • Who funds TRINITY-PAWLING SCHOOL CORPORATION
  • Who funds AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL MARITIME HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds HARBOR ISLAND CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds MAMARONECK HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds LARCHMONT HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE JAY HERITAGE CENTER
  • Who funds Larchmont-Mamaroneck Hunger Task Force Inc
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF READ WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peter & Rosanne Aresty FoundationNY17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peter & Rosanne Aresty Foundation · Glff Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Eugenie S Wright Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Eugenie S Wright Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Eugenie S Wright Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph