Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eugene C and Wiletta F Denton Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$69kHuman Services$35kHealth$16kHousing & Shelter$13kReligion$10kEducation$5kArts & Culture$5kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES$11,000
RECENTER$5,000
EMERGE$4,000
MOBILE MEALS$4,000
ST FRANCIS SHELTER$4,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN AZ$3,000
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$3,000
COMMUNITY GARDENS OF TUCSON$3,000
WHITE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$3,000
FLOWING WELLS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GABRIEL'S ANGELS: $2k → 11%AVIVA CHILDRENS SERVICES: $1k → 15%ST LUKES HOME: $7k → 15%ST LUKES IN THE DESERT: $2k → 15%ST LUKES IN THE DESERT: $2k → 15%ST LUKES IN THE DESERT: $1k → 15%ST LUKES HOME: $500 → 15%ANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT: $2k → 15%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $1k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $750 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 60% of Eugene C and Wiletta F Denton Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in AZ; by stated purpose, 38%.

Eugene C and Wiletta F Denton Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$156k · 14 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
22

Total granted

$156k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+25%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    Interfaith Community Services
    3× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +63%
  • CG
    COMMUNITY GARDENS OF TUCSON INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +117%
  • SL
    St Lukes in the Desert Inc
    5× · 2017–2023 · $12k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • IC
    INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES MOBILE FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CM
    CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF TUCSON
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • MM
    MOBILE MEALS OF S AZ
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Azcend

AZCEND nourishes minds and bodies so that neighbors in need experience a brighter future.

Human Services
2
Tempe Community Action Agency Inc

TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…

Community Improvement
3
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
4
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
5
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
6
St Mary's Food Bank Alliance

Bridging the gap for arizona communities with nourishment for today and hope for tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
7
Phoenix Community Farm

Our mission is to meet the basic need for fresh, healthy produce. We grow and share produce and educate and empower our community to grow healthy together.

Food & Nutrition
8
Paz De Cristo Community Center

To feed, clothe and empower those struggling with hunger, poverty homelessness in the city of Mesa, Arizona area, by serving over 70,000 hot evening meals per year. (Continued on Schedule O, Statement 2)

Food & Nutrition
9
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
10
Pima Council on Aging

Our mission is to promote dignity and respect for aging, and to advocate for independence in the lives of Pima County's older adults and their families, now and for generations to come.

Human Services
11
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
12
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Community Services; the most unlike its peers is St Francis Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Interfaith Community Services: $24,500 · OtherInterfaith Community ServicesMOBILE MEALS: $16,250 · OtherMOBILE MEALSEMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COORDINATING COUNCIL OF SE AZ: $13,000 · OtherEMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COORDINATING COUNCIL OF SE AZIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES MOBILE FOOD BANK: $9,750 · OtherINTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES MOBILE FOOD BANKGOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INC: $9,750 · OtherGOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $8,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYMOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN AZ: $8,000 · OtherMOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN AZCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $5,250 · OtherRECENTER: $5,000 · Other+14 more: $30,750 · Other+14 moreCOMMUNITY GARDENS OF TUCSON INC: $14,750 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY GARDENS …FELICIA'S FARM FKA IZI AZI FOUNDATION: $11,500 · Food & NutritionFELICIA'S FARM FKA…Community Food Bank Inc: $9,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food Ban…+1 more: $1,000 · Food & NutritionSt Lukes in the Desert Inc: $12,250 · Human ServicesSt Lukes i…ANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT: $2,250 · Human ServicesANGEL HEAR…GABRIELS ANGELS INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesGABRIELS A…TUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $1,250 · Human ServicesTUCSON CEN…AVIVA CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $750 · Human ServicesSt Francis Shelter: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterCAMP NOT-A-WHEEZE: $2,250 · HealthSaavi Services for the Blind: $2,250 · HealthTHE CENTER FOR NEUROSCIENCES FOUNDATION: $1,500 · HealthLITERACY CONNECTS: $5,250 · EducationPROJECT ANGEL HEART: $1,000 · Community ImprovementTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$140,750Food & Nutrition$36,250Human Services$19,500Housing & Shelter$8,000Health$6,000Education$5,250Community Improvement$1,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInterfaith Community Services: $24,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY GARDENS OF TUCSON INC: $14,750 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetEMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COORDINATING COUNCIL OF SE AZ: $13,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetSt Lukes in the Desert Inc: $12,250 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFELICIA'S FARM FKA IZI AZI FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSt Francis Shelter: $8,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetLITERACY CONNECTS: $5,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP NOT-A-WHEEZE: $2,250 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSaavi Services for the Blind: $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT: $2,250 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGABRIELS ANGELS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR NEUROSCIENCES FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL HEART: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVIVA CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Interfaith Community Services ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY GARDENS OF TUCSON INC ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COORDINATING COUNCIL OF SE AZ ↗
  • Who funds St Lukes in the Desert Inc ↗
  • Who funds FELICIA'S FARM FKA IZI AZI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds St Francis Shelter ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY CONNECTS ↗
  • Who funds CAMP NOT-A-WHEEZE ↗
  • Who funds Saavi Services for the Blind ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds GABRIELS ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR NEUROSCIENCES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL HEART ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds AVIVA CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ36× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · Lucille E Williams Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · America's Charities · Elizabeth Read Taylor Foundation · Angel Charity for Children Inc · William & Ruth Pendleton Memorial Fund US Bank National Association · Sundt Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eugene C and Wiletta F Denton Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eugene C and Wiletta F Denton Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Eugene C and Wiletta F Denton Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Eugene C and Wiletta F Denton Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eugene C and Wiletta F Denton Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph