Skip to content

· Public charity

Et Cetera Shop Inc

To glorify god by helping those in need through the selling of low-cost donated items.

$321k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.0MHuman Services$470kFood & Nutrition$469kHealth$352kReligion$228kHousing & Shelter$222kEnvironment$80kPublic Benefit$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $302,750, the rows itemized in this filing. The $320,800 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $18,050 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $213k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$17,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$657k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA$50,000
STEP UP TRANSITIONAL LIVING$23,500
WEATHERFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS$22,750
CLINTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS$22,750
CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA INC$21,000
AGAPE CLINIC$18,500
FIRST CHOICE PREGNANCY CENTER$18,500
THOMAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS$17,750
CORDELL PUBLIC SCHOOLS$17,750
HYDRO-EAKLY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$17,750
HARLEY'S HOUSE$12,500
WEATHERFORD MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE$10,000
JUST JOY ACTIVITY CENTER$10,000
HYDRO MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE$8,000
CLINTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $371k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $39k → 16%CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $31k → 16%CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $29k → 16%CASA of Western Oklahoma: $26k → 16%CASA of Western Oklahoma: $26k → 16%CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $26k → 16%JUST JOY ACTIVITY CENTER: $23k → 16%CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $21k → 16%CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $20k → 16%CASA of Western Oklahoma: $16k → 16%CONNECTIONS FOOD & RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 16%CONNECTIONS FOOD & RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 16%CONNECTIONS FOOD & RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 16%JUST JOY ACTIVITY CENTER: $10k → 16%JUST JOY ACTIVITY CENTER: $10k → 16%CONNECTIONS FOOD & RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 16%Weatherford Food & Resource: $10k → 16%JUST JOY ACTIVITY CENTER: $10k → 16%JUST JOY ACTIVITY CENTER: $10k → 16%Weatherford Food & Resource: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 21 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
6

Total granted

$3.2M
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+87%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentReligionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $374k · revenue +51%
  • CO
    CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $233k · revenue +96%
  • SU
    STEP UP TRANSITIONAL LIVING PROGRAM
    8× · 2018–2025 · $211k · revenue +44% · 36% of their budget

Funded once

  • B1
    Branch 15 Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue +87%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $21k
  • P
    PALS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hoseas House Inc

The mission of Hoseas House is to extend the love and compassion of Jesus Christ to women & children in crisis through advocacy education housing community outreach and prayer. Hoseas House guides families in reaching their greatest…

Human Services
2
Texas Battered Women's Center Inc

Provide care, assistance, and counseling for abused women. Provide food for needy families.

Human Services
3
Kiamichi Valley Ministerial Alliance Inc

Provide emergency assistance to those in need of food, lodging and gasoline, and maintain food pantry.

Food & Nutrition
4
Dale County Rescue Mission

The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.

Human Services
5
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
6
Ruth's House of Hope

To help women and children in recovery from violence, oppression and homelessness in rice county. to provide affordable housing in a safe, supportive and healing environment as a transition into a new beginning.

Housing & Shelter
7
Keturahs Haven

Keturahs Haven is a Christ-centered home to assist homeless pregnant women who need to be loved, nurtured, encouraged and supported during their pregnancy

Human Services
8
House of Hope of Warren County

To provide a safe and structured environment where women will have an opportunity to experience Gods unconditional love, forgiveness and transforming power enabling them to take advantage of support and resources offered to assist them in…

Crime & Legal
9
A New Beginning for Women and Children

We are a ministry that serves women and children who are homeless, who need accountability for sober living or who are recovering from domestic violencwe

Human Services
10
Embrace Hope Collaboratorium Inc

Embrace Hope's primary goal is to break the cycle of homelessness and reduce the number of children in foster care due to neglect and abuse by providing shelter for and serving those currently experiencing homelessness while simultaneously…

Human Services
11
Lifehouse Ministries Inc
Housing & Shelter
12
Church Womens Christian Ministries Inc

To distribute food clothing personal care products and household articles and to provide financial assistance for emergency housing utilities medical services and transportation to the poor and indigent people of Clay County Fl.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Branch 15 Inc; the most unlike its peers is First Choice Pregnancy Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEATHERFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $253,250 · OtherWEATHERFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLSCLINTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $252,750 · OtherCLINTON PUBLIC SCHOOLSHYDRO-EAKLY MIDDLE SCH & HS: $213,750 · OtherHYDRO-EAKLY MIDDLE SCH & HSTHOMAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $207,750 · OtherTHOMAS PUBLIC SCHOOLSCORDELL ELEMENTARY: $207,750 · OtherCORDELL ELEMENTARYAGAPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $124,500 · OtherAGAPE MEDICAL CLINIC INCMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE U S: $115,000 · OtherMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE U SHYDRO MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $88,417 · OtherCLINTON MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $88,417 · OtherCORDELL MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $88,417 · OtherTHOMAS MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $88,417 · OtherCORN MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE: $88,417 · Other+5 more: $53,782 · OtherREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $374,000 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL FOO…CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA: $233,000 · Human ServicesCASA OF WEST…Weatherford Food & Resource Center Inc: $75,000 · Human ServicesWeatherford …Just Joy Activity Center Inc: $62,500 · Human ServicesJust Joy Act…FIRST CHOICE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $179,000 · HealthHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $80,000 · HealthSTEP UP TRANSITIONAL LIVING PROGRAM: $210,500 · Youth DevelopmentWEATHERFORD MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE INC: $130,417 · ReligionHarleys House Crisis Nursery Association: $42,500 · Crime & LegalBranch 15 Inc: $35,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,870,617Food & Nutrition$374,000Human Services$370,500Health$259,000Youth Development$210,500Religion$130,417Crime & Legal$42,500Housing & Shelter$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $374,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA: $233,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetSTEP UP TRANSITIONAL LIVING PROGRAM: $210,500 over 8y, 36% of budgetFIRST CHOICE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $179,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetWEATHERFORD MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE INC: $130,417 over 9y, 22% of budgetHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWeatherford Food & Resource Center Inc: $75,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetJust Joy Activity Center Inc: $62,500 over 5y, 33% of budgetHarleys House Crisis Nursery Association: $42,500 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetBranch 15 Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetWeatherford Regional Hospital: $5,340 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA CASA OF WESTERN OKLAHOMA ↗
  • Who funds STEP UP TRANSITIONAL LIVING PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds FIRST CHOICE PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WEATHERFORD MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Weatherford Food & Resource Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Just Joy Activity Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Harleys House Crisis Nursery Association ↗
  • Who funds Branch 15 Inc ↗
  • Who funds Weatherford Regional Hospital ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Defehr Family Foundation Inc · Feed the Children Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Et Cetera Shop Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Et Cetera Shop Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    9get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Et Cetera Shop’s filings →

    More from the funding graph