Skip to content

· Private foundation

Esjay Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250k
Granted FY2025still arriving
64
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$363kCivil Rights$213kEnvironment$209kInternational$95kHealth$93kPublic Safety & Disaster$78kFood & Nutrition$56kHousing & Shelter$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k54 grants · $82k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $168k
$1,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$40,350
SOLIDAIRE$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$20,000
UNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY$15,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$14,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$12,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$11,500
SAHUARITA FOOD BANK$10,000
ADL$10,000
NATIONAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL$10,000
ACTBLUE - EVERYTOWN SUPPORT FUNDACTBLUE CHARITIES$6,606
NATIONAL DOMESTIC WORKERS ALLIANCE$6,500
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$5,100
OXFAM AMERICA$5,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DEFINE AMERICAN: $250 → 14%BLACK FAIRY GODMOTHER FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%DEFINE AMERICAN: $250 → 15%DEFINE AMERICAN: $250 → 14%BLACK FAIRY GODMOTHER FOUNDATION: $500 → 7%BLACK FAIRY GODMOTHER FOUNDATION: $400 → 7%AL OTRO LADO: $250 → 11%AL OTRO LADO: $200 → 11%BORDER ANGELS: $250 → 11%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $500 → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $500 → 15%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
SD
IA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 98 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

98 repeat relationships: 46 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

98
91

Total granted

$1.0M
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+8%

Still filing today

67%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalCivil RightsArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +68%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $79k · revenue +12%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $73k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • CC
    CITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +4%
  • N
    NRDC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
7
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
8
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
9
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
10
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
11
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
12
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Lava Mae. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 213 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
112/113
Grantees still filing
77/113
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOLIDAIRE INC: $46,000 · OtherSOLIDAIRE INCADL OF ROCKY MOUNTAINS: $39,500 · OtherADL OF ROCKY MOUNTAINSADL: $23,000 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS: $23,500 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $21,350 · Other+140 more: $343,775 · Other+140 moreEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $166,650 · PhilanthropyEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY …UNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC: $105,180 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WELD COUN…+7 more: $16,850 · Philanthropy+7 moreWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $73,111 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $34,950 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS…OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $19,220 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA…Save The Children Federation Inc: $14,580 · InternationalSave The Chil…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $6,720 · International+8 more: $9,434 · International+8 moreAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $66,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CI…National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $31,900 · Civil RightsNational Do…NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $12,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL…ACLU FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsACLU FOUNDA…REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $7,600 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $7,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $4,919 · Civil Rights+4 more: $3,250 · Civil RightsNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RES…EARTHJUSTICE: $45,300 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTIC…HONOR THE EARTH: $15,000 · EnvironmentHONOR THE E…CITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP: $10,000 · EnvironmentCITIZENS CL…+9 more: $18,354 · Environment+9 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $78,785 · HealthSERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $6,500 · Health+3 more: $3,500 · HealthFeeding America: $44,000 · Food & NutritionSAHUARITA FOOD BANK: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $950 · Food & Nutrition
Other$497,125Philanthropy$288,680International$158,015Civil Rights$142,669Environment$138,654Health$88,785Food & Nutrition$54,950

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $166,650 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC: $105,180 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $78,785 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $73,111 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $66,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $50,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $45,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $44,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $34,950 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $31,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS: $23,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $21,350 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $19,220 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN VALLEY HORSE RESCUE: $16,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTNDC SUPPORTING FUND: $15,200 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetHONOR THE EARTH: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $15,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $14,580 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACLU FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSAHUARITA FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $7,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO: $7,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $6,720 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLegal Aid Foundation of Colorado: $5,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBorder Community Alliance Inc: $5,700 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $4,919 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE COLLABORATIVE: $3,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $3,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $3,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $3,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $2,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUte Springs Experiential Learning Center: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBLACK FAIRY GODMOTHER FOUNDATION INC A NJ NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION: $2,400 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN VALLEY HORSE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds TNDC SUPPORTING FUND ↗
  • Who funds HONOR THE EARTH ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP ↗
  • Who funds ACLU FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds SAHUARITA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA18.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Tides Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Colorado Gives Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Esjay Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Esjay Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Babson College: 3% of income from government
  • Fund for Educational Excellence Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Esjay Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Esjay Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 213 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Esjay’s filings →

More from the funding graph