Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ers Charitable Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$299kReligion$157kHuman Services$144kFood & Nutrition$121kHealth$71kCommunity Improvement$51kCrime & Legal$21kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$88k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RARITAN VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE - RVCC FOUNDATION$50,000
SHIMON & SARA BIRNBAUM JCC$50,000
FLEMINGTON FOOD PANTRY$20,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICEFAMILY MENTOR SERVICE$10,000
SHIMON & SARA BIRNBAUM JCC$3,600
HUNTERDON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$2,500
LEGAL SERVICES OF NJ CAMPAIGN FOR JUSTICE$2,500
THE FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK$2,000
TEWKSBURY FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND$1,500
FRIENDS OF THE TEWKSBURY TWP LIBRARY$1,500
TEWKSBURY LAND TRUST$1,000
ENDWELL FOUNDATION$1,000
THE COMPLETED LIFE INITIATIVE INC$1,000
FRIENDS OF WHITTEMORE$1,000
JEWISH FEDERATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $179k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ANSOB CENTER FOR REFUGEES: $1k → 13%SHIMON & SARA BIRNBAUM JCC: $50k → 5%THE FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $2k → 11%SHIMON & SARA BIRNBAUM JCC: $35k → 5%THE FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $2k → 11%SHIMON & SARA BIRNBAUM JCC: $35k → 5%THE FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $2k → 11%SHIMON & SARA BIRNBAUM JCC: $31k → 5%THE FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $2k → 11%SHIMON & SARA BIRNBAUM JCC: $4k → 5%SAFE IN HUNTERDON: $5k → 4%SAFE IN HUNTERDON: $4k → 4%SAFE IN HUNTERDON: $4k → 4%SHIMON & SARA BIRNBAUM JCC: $475 → 5%SHIMON & SARA BIRNBAUM JCC: $395 → 5%SHIMON & SARA BIRNBAUM JCC: $395 → 5%SHIMON & SARA BIRNBAUM JCC: $395 → 5%SHIMON & SARA BIRNBAUM JCC: $250 → 5%MEALS ON WHEELS IN HUNTERDAON: $300 → 4%THE CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS: $500 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of Ers Charitable Fund Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in NJ; read by stated purpose it is 84% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Ers Charitable Fund Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$807k · 23 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
23

Total granted

$807k
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+30%

Still filing today

43%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RV
    Raritan Valley Community College Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $276k · revenue +159%
  • JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $157k · revenue +29%
  • SAFE IN HUNTERDON
    3× · 2017–2019 · $13k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER THE SUSTAINABILITY CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER COVID RECOVERY PROGRAM
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
2
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

3
Foundation for Hackettstown Medical Center

To serve the philanthropic needs for the Hackettstown Medical Center.

4
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Jfk Medical Associates Pa

Jfk medical associates, p.a. is committed to excellence in providing quality and compassionate healthcare services to diverse communities.

Health
7
Hartwyck At Jfk Inc

To provide high quality care & management services for people in need of long

Health
8
Hackensack Specialty Care Associates Pc

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

Health
9
Raritan Valley Community College

Raritan Valley Community College is an educational community that works to develop critical thinking, foster intellectual curiosity, promote leadership, encourage social responsibility and support personal growth.

Education
10
Hunterdon Primary Care Pc

To support the goals and objectives of hunterdon healthcare system, inc. and its affiliates; a tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system. hunterdon primary care, p.c.'s activities and charitable purposes include, without limitation,…

11
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe in Hunterdon and the most unlike its peers is Tewksbury Connect. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%13%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr18%17%20–35yr11%35%35–55yr12%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%3%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr18%33%20–35yr11%60%35–55yr12%3%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/24
the rest of the field
14%
11,798/86,298

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FLEMINGTON FOOD PANTRY — $120,000 · OtherFLEMINGTON FOOD PANTRYJEWISH FAMILY SERVICEFAMILY MENTOR SERVICE — $74,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICEFAMILY MENTOR SERVICEJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER SUCCESS CAPITAL CAMPAIGN — $26,304 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER SUCCESS CAPITAL CAMPAIGNJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER SPECIAL NEEDS CHALENGE — $25,945 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER SPECIAL NEEDS CHALENGEJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER THE SUSTAINABILITY CAMPAIGN — $25,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER THE SUSTAINABILITY CAMPAIG…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER COVID RECOVERY PROGRAM — $25,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER COVID RECOVERY PROGRAMLEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST JERSEY HUNTERDON DIV — $15,000 · OtherHUNTERDON DRUG AWARENESS PROGRAM INC — $15,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $15,000 · Other+24 more — $63,775 · Other+24 moreRaritan Valley Community College Foundation — $276,000 · EducationRaritan Valley Community College F…+2 more — $1,500 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND — $156,510 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTE…SAFE IN HUNTERDON — $13,000 · Human ServicesSAFE IN HUNTERDONFAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC — $7,800 · Human Services+3 more — $1,800 · Human ServicesHUNTERDON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $16,500 · HealthEND WELL FOUNDATION — $4,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,000 · HealthUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND WARREN COUNTIES INC — $2,860 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $1,000 · PhilanthropyTEWKSBURY CONNECT — $6,000 · Arts & CultureCaramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc — $5,050 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF WHITTEMORE INC — $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$405,024Education$277,500Human Services$179,110Health$21,500Philanthropy$13,860Arts & Culture$11,050Recreation & Sports$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRaritan Valley Community College Foundation — $276,000 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND — $156,510 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHUNTERDON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $16,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHUNTERDON DRUG AWARENESS PROGRAM INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSAFE IN HUNTERDON — $13,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC — $7,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEWKSBURY CONNECT — $6,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetCaramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc — $5,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEND WELL FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF WHITTEMORE INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND WARREN COUNTIES INC — $2,860 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPOTTERSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY — $2,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOFSTRA UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeals on Wheels in Hunterdon Inc — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Raritan Valley Community College Foundation
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND
  • Who funds HUNTERDON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HUNTERDON DRUG AWARENESS PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds SAFE IN HUNTERDON
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC
  • Who funds TEWKSBURY CONNECT
  • Who funds Caramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc
  • Who funds END WELL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF WHITTEMORE INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOMERSET HUNTERDON AND WARREN COUNTIES INC
  • Who funds POTTERSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY
  • Who funds THE ANSOB CENTER FOR REFUGEES INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Columbia Bank Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Provident Bank Foundation · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ers Charitable Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 47%
  • Safe in Hunterdon51% of income from government
  • Family Resource Network Inc47% of income from government
  • United Way of Northern New Jersey Inc3% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph