Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ernst and Wilma Martens Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$126kEnvironment$108kHuman Services$79kArts & Culture$74kEducation$60kRecreation & Sports$35kYouth Development$12kReligion$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILDERNESS WORKSHOP$7,500
ASPEN JOURNALISM$5,000
HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY$5,000
CHALLENGE ASPEN$4,000
SHINING STARS FOUNDATION$4,000
ROARING FORK CONSERVANCY$4,000
INDEPENDENCE PASS FOUNDATION$3,000
MT SOPRIS NORDIC COUNCIL$3,000
WALDORF SCHOOL$3,000
ENGLISH IN ACTION$3,000
FAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM$3,000
BASALT REGIONAL LIBRARY$2,000
WINDWALKERS$2,000
ASPEN VALLEY SKI AND SNOWBOARD CLUB$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $4k → 6%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 7%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $4k → 6%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 7%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $4k → 6%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 7%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $4k → 6%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 7%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $4k → 6%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 7%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $4k → 6%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 7%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $4k → 6%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 7%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $4k → 6%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 7%RESPONSE: $3k → 6%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CENTER: $2k → 6%WINDWALKERS: $2k → 6%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CENTER: $2k → 6%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CENTER: $2k → 6%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CENTER: $2k → 6%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CENTER: $2k → 6%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CENTER: $2k → 6%WINDWALKERS: $2k → 6%WINDWALKERS: $2k → 6%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CENTER: $2k → 6%CARBONDALE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CENTER: $2k → 6%WINDWALKERS: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$647k · 34 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
3

Total granted

$647k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+140%
+1569%

Still filing today

53%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WW
    WILDERNESS WORKSHOP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +149%
  • SS
    SHINING STARS FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +95%
  • CA
    CHALLENGE ASPEN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • RH
    Response - Help for Survivors of Domestic Violence & Sexual Assaultgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue ×17
  • AC
    ASPEN CAMP FOR THE DEAF
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aspen Skiing Company Environment Foundation

The aspen skiing company environment foundation is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the enhancement and protection of the environmental quality of the roaring fork valley region. we support projects that promote environmental…

Philanthropy
2
Aspen Valley Land Trust

Protecting the open land and special places of the roaring fork and middle colorado river valleys for wildlife, agriculture, and community forever.

Environment
3
Colorado Discover Ability

Provide adaptive sports for the disabled.

Recreation & Sports
4
Danceaspen

To enrich the roaring fork community through locally based curations of high caliber dance.

Arts & Culture
5
Wild Rockies Field Institute Inc

To broaden the nature of a liberal arts education; teach critical thinking about social & environmental issues; foster understanding of & respect for natural & human communities; & cultivate a sense of place that encourages personal,…

Education
6
Colorado Press Association

Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…

—
7
San Juan Mountains Association

To empower visitors and locals to explore, learn about and protect the spectacular public lands of Southwest Colorado.

Environment
8
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
9
Theatre Aspen

Entertain, enlighten, enrich, educate and challenge the residents and visitors of the roaring fork valley through professional quality theatrical productions, new play development initiatives and a broad spectrum of educational programs.

Arts & Culture
10
Seminars At Steamboat

To bring nationally and internationally recognized experts on a wide range of public policy issues to the Steamboat community. Seminars are free and open to the public.

Civil Rights
11
Aspen Science Center

To advance the public understanding of science through lifelong discovery, exploration and education.

Education
12
Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center

To expand the potential of people with disabilities and special needs through meaningful, education and inspiring outdoor experiences.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aspen Valley Skisnowboard Club Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pregnancy Resource Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $102,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWILDERNESS WORKSHOP: $60,000 · OtherWILDERNESS WORKSHOPFAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM: $24,000 · OtherFAMILY VISITOR PROGRAMLIFT UP: $21,000 · OtherLIFT UPINDEPENDENCE PASS FOUNDATION: $21,000 · OtherINDEPENDENCE PASS FOUNDATIONMOUNT SOPRIS NORDIC COUNCIL INC: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherSENIORS INDEPENDENT INC: $15,000 · OtherBASALT REGIONAL LIBRARY: $14,000 · Other+14 more: $94,000 · Other+14 moreHOSPICE OF THE VALLEY INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF THE VA…CHALLENGE ASPEN: $32,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGE ASPENCARBONDALE COMMUNITY NONPROFIT CENTER: $16,000 · Human ServicesCARBONDALE COMMUN…WINDWALKERS EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING AND: $8,000 · Human ServicesWINDWALKERS EQUIN…+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesAspen Journalism: $30,000 · Arts & CultureASPEN FILM: $12,000 · Arts & CultureThe Art Base: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSHINING STARS FOUNDATION: $32,000 · Recreation & SportsASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $14,000 · Recreation & SportsEnglish in Action: $21,000 · EducationBASALT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $11,000 · EducationCARBONDALE CLAY CENTER: $8,000 · EducationROARING FORK CONSERVANCY: $24,000 · EnvironmentPathfinders: $12,000 · HealthPregnancy Resource Center Inc: $2,000 · Health
Other$385,000Human Services$99,000Arts & Culture$52,000Recreation & Sports$46,000Education$40,000Environment$24,000Health$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILDERNESS WORKSHOP: $60,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE VALLEY INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSHINING STARS FOUNDATION: $32,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCHALLENGE ASPEN: $32,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetAspen Journalism: $30,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetROARING FORK CONSERVANCY: $24,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetINDEPENDENCE PASS FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetEnglish in Action: $21,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNT SOPRIS NORDIC COUNCIL INC: $18,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetCARBONDALE COMMUNITY NONPROFIT CENTER: $16,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPathfinders: $12,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE BUDDY PROGRAM INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetASPEN FILM: $12,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetBASALT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetThe Art Base: $10,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWINDWALKERS EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING AND: $8,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCARBONDALE CLAY CENTER: $8,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetResponse - Help for Survivors of Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault: $3,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPregnancy Resource Center Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILDERNESS WORKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHINING STARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGE ASPEN ↗
  • Who funds Aspen Journalism ↗
  • Who funds ROARING FORK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENCE PASS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds English in Action ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SOPRIS NORDIC COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds CARBONDALE COMMUNITY NONPROFIT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Pathfinders ↗
  • Who funds THE BUDDY PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN FILM ↗
  • Who funds BASALT EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Art Base ↗
  • Who funds WINDWALKERS EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING AND ↗
  • Who funds CARBONDALE CLAY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Response - Help for Survivors of Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault ↗
  • Who funds Pregnancy Resource Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO30.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Aspen Community Foundation · Brady Foundation · Aspen Business Center Foundation · Arches Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Thrift Shop · Alpenglow Foundation · The Thendara Foundation · Fred and Elli Iselin Foundation · Castaways Foundation · The Flunison Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ernst and Wilma Martens Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ernst and Wilma Martens Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ernst and Wilma Martens Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ernst and Wilma Martens Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ernst and Wilma Martens’ filings →

    More from the funding graph