Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ernest Gallo Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2.0M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

54% of Ernest Gallo Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to University Of Notre Dame Du Lac, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
20
3
21
7
22
6
23
7
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Recreation & Sports$6.0MHealth$3.5MHuman Services$500kYouth Development$250kArts & Culture$210kEducation$155kFood & Nutrition$61kCivil Rights$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.4M
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$2,000,000
LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH$1,400,000
JOHN BURTON ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH$100,000
JORDAN'S GUARDIAN ANGELS$100,000
MARK STEPHEN GALLO MEMORIAL FUND$50,000
UNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION$30,000
GALLO CENTER FOR THE ARTS$25,000
STANISLAUS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,500
AUTISM TRUST USA$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $500k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JORDAN'S GUARDIAN ANGELS: $100k → 12%JORDAN'S GUARDIAN ANGELS: $100k → 12%JORDAN'S GUARDIAN ANGELS: $100k → 12%JORDAN'S GUARDIAN ANGELS: $100k → 12%JORDAN'S GUARDIAN ANGELS: $100k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 5 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$3.5M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
0%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JG
    JORDANS GUARDIAN ANGELS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +60%
  • JB
    John Burton Advocates for Youth
    3× · 2021–2024 · $250k · revenue +27%
  • GC
    GALLO CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $210k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue 0%
  • 1G
    1984 Grupe Fair Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -99%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CALIFORNIA UNITED
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
2
Foundation of California State University Monterey Bay

To further the scientific, literary, educational and charitable purposes of california state university, monterey bay, including fundraising, development, endowment management, financial assistance, public relations and other support.

Education
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
5
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital At Stanford

Organization's primary exempt purpose the specific and primary purposes of lucile salter packard children's hospital at stanford ("lpch") are to support, benefit and further the charitable, scientific, and educational purposes of the board…

Health
8
The California Endowment
Philanthropy
9
California State University Foundation

Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…

Philanthropy
10
Uc Santa Cruz Foundation

To benefit the university of california santa cruz.

Education
11
Sutter Valley Medical Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: Caring for our patients first and our people always. VISION: To be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
Ucsf Health Community Hospitals Fka Saint Francis Memorial Hospital

Ucsf health community hospital's mission statement is caring, healing, teaching, and discovering.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of California San Francisco Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Modesto Parent Participation Preschool Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Notre Dame du Lac — $6,000,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION+1 more — $100,000 · EducationLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $2,467,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION …+1 more — $500 · HealthJORDANS GUARDIAN ANGELS — $500,000 · Human ServicesJohn Burton Advocates for Youth — $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentGALLO CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $210,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION — $60,000 · PhilanthropyStanislaus Community Foundation — $5,000 · PhilanthropyMARK STEPHEN GALLO MEMORIAL FUND — $50,000 · ReligionSISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS — $25,000 · OtherModesto Parent Participation Preschool Incorporated — $5,000 · Other1984 Grupe Fair Fund — $25,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CALIFORNIA UNITED — $25,000 · OtherMODESTO GOSPEL MISSION — $5,000 · Other+1 more — $1,000 · Other
Education$7,100,000Health$2,467,500Human Services$500,000Youth Development$250,000Arts & Culture$210,000Philanthropy$65,000Religion$50,000Other$86,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $6,000,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $2,467,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJORDANS GUARDIAN ANGELS — $500,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetJohn Burton Advocates for Youth — $250,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetGALLO CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $210,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SAMARITANS FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budget1984 Grupe Fair Fund — $25,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CALIFORNIA UNITED — $25,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetMODESTO GOSPEL MISSION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetModesto Parent Participation Preschool Incorporated — $5,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetStanislaus Community Foundation — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM TRUST USA — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bob & Marie Gallo FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bob & Marie Gallo Foundation · The Cortopassi Family Foundation · Stanislaus Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ernest Gallo Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ernest Gallo Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ernest Gallo Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph