Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eric and Sheila Samson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Education$2.6MReligion$2.4MHealth$1.6MInternational$1.4MYouth Development$173kHuman Services$44kPhilanthropy$43kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $241k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $479k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$39,600
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TARBUT VTORAH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL$1,000,000
USC FOR UNIVERSITY GIFT ADVANCEMENT$308,000
TOGETHER WITH ISRAEL$250,000
CHABAD OF NORTH IRVINE$136,764
CONGREGATION OF ADAT YESHRUN$90,851
BETH JACOB CONGREGATION OF IRVINE$72,000
CHABAD STUDENT CENTER$72,000
WOW INC$57,800
H F EPSTEIN HEBREW ACADEMY$50,000
CHABAD OF IRVINE$41,000
Individual grant recipient$39,600
PLAZA SYNAGOGUE DBA YOUNG JEWISH PROFESSIONALS$36,000
IRVINE HEBREW DAY SCHOOL$36,000
CONG AGUDAS ACHIM JEWISH BURIAL$36,000
Individual grant recipient$27,539
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND: $1k → 17%ORANGE COUNTRY FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $10k → 10%ORANGE COUNTRY FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $10k → 10%VALLEY FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
NJ
CA
MO
MD
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Eric and Sheila Samson Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Eric and Sheila Samson Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 14 repeat orgs$3.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
14

Total granted

$5.2M
$3.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
0%

Still filing today

29%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $208k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationHealthPublic Safety & DisasterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    TARBUT V'TORAH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +8%
  • TI
    TOGETHERWITHISRAEL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $750k · revenue +160%
  • CO
    CONGREGATION OF ADAT YESHRUN
    3× · 2023–2025 · $716k

Funded once

  • CC
    CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M
  • HH
    HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $600k · revenue +40%
  • CF
    Central Fund of Israelgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
2
Israel Select Charity Fund Inc

Helping individuals and organizations with great needs and little resources and with often few options.

Human Services
3
Chaverim Israel Family Services Inc

To provide medical support to families in need

Employment
4
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
5
Friends of Jerusalem

Friends of Jerusalem's mission is to provide assistance to the needs and indigent living in Jerusalem and all of Israel.

Human Services
6
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
7
Adi Israel Foundation Inc

Aleh Israel Foundation, Inc.(The Foundation)is a Foundation that provides support to rehabilitative centers caring for most severely disabled children in Israel.

International
8
Sherit Isroel
—
9
Friends of Tzeirei Chabad in Israel Inc

To pursue a greater outreach of knowledge of the Jewish Torah and to further educate the less knowledgeable

Religion
10
American Friends of Idf Widows and Orphans Organization Inc

American Friends of IDFWO is dedicated to providing financial, emotional, and social support to the families of Israeli soldiers who have sacrificed their lives in service. We aim to honor their legacy and help rebuild the lives of widows…

Human Services
11
American Friends of Tzohar

Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel

—
12
Partners Charity Fund for Israel

To support charitable organization and programs providing food, clothing and financial aid to indigent individuals and families in financial distress.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Foundation of Orange County; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Mishpacha Orphanage Odessa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
8/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONCONGREGATION OF ADAT YESHRUN: $715,611 · OtherCONGREGATION OF ADAT YESHRUNCHABAD STUDENT CENTER INC: $526,300 · OtherCHABAD STUDENT CENTER INCUSC FOR UNIVERSITY GIFT ADVANCEMENT: $416,000 · OtherUSC FOR UNIVERSITY GIFT ADVANCEMENTFRIENDS OF SINAI TRUST: $350,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF SINAI TRUSTCHABAD OF NORTH IRVINE: $285,064 · OtherCHABAD OF NORTH IRVINEWOW INC: $173,250 · Other+13 more: $553,301 · Other+13 moreTARBUT V'TORAH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL: $2,000,000 · EducationTARBUT V'TORAH COMMUNITY DAY S…TIKVA CORP: $250,000 · EducationTIKVA CORPTOGETHERWITHISRAEL INC: $750,000 · InternationalTOGETHERWITHISRAEL …Central Fund of Israel: $500,000 · InternationalCentral Fund of Isr…FRIENDS OF MISHTERET YISRAEL: $170,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF MISHTERE…+2 more: $23,600 · InternationalHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $600,000 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · HealthJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $43,450 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHAIYANU: $38,600 · PhilanthropyThe Orange County Friendship Circle Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesVALLEY FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $3,600 · Human ServicesISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $1,163 · Human ServicesOVERWATCH FOUNDATION: $21,932 · Public Safety & DisasterPROJECT INSPIRE INC: $10,000 · Religion
Other$4,019,526Education$2,250,000International$1,443,600Health$610,000Philanthropy$82,050Human Services$24,763Public Safety & Disaster$21,932Religion$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTARBUT V'TORAH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL: $2,000,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetTOGETHERWITHISRAEL INC: $750,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $600,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $500,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTIKVA CORP: $250,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MISHTERET YISRAEL: $170,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $43,450 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHAIYANU: $38,600 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetADOPT A FAMILY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetThe Orange County Friendship Circle Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetPROJECT INSPIRE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $1,163 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TARBUT V'TORAH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHERWITHISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds TIKVA CORP ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MISHTERET YISRAEL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHAIYANU ↗
  • Who funds IRVINE HEBREW DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds OVERWATCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ADOPT A FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Orange County Friendship Circle Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT INSPIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MISHPACHA ORPHANAGE ODESSA ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Orange CountyCA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Orange County · Jewish Community Foundation of Orange County · Jewish Communal Fund · Samueli Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eric and Sheila Samson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eric and Sheila Samson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eric and Sheila Samson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph