· Private foundation
E R Crawford Est Trust Fund a Xxx-Xx-Xxxx
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k63 grants · $270k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $166k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PENN STATE GREATER ALLEGHENY | $30,000 |
| CARNEGIE FREE LIBRARY OF MCKEESPORT | $20,000 |
| ALLEGHENY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS | $20,000 |
| MCKEESPORT HISTORY & HERITAGE CENTER | $18,000 |
| FRIENDS OF CAMP SOLES | $14,000 |
| ST ANTHONY SCHOOL PROGRAMS | $12,000 |
| MCKEESPORT AREA MEALS ON WHEELS INC | $12,000 |
| IN CARE OF CATS INC | $10,000 |
| GROW PITTSBURGH | $10,000 |
| GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| CENTER FOR VICTIMS | $10,000 |
| PINE VALLEY CAMP | $9,500 |
| ELIZABETH TOWNSHIP HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $8,000 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH DUQUESNE | $8,000 |
| THE ROCK OF THE REDEEMER CHURCH | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
119 repeat relationships — 61 still active in FY2025, 58 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MRMCKEESPORT REGIONAL HISTORY & HERIT6× · 2020–2025 · $136k · revenue +12%
- MMMckeesport Meals on Wheels Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $82k · revenue +101%
- GPGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK6× · 2020–2025 · $76k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- UUPMCone grant, 2022 · $50k
- EVELIZABETH VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANYone grant, 2022 · $15k
- SAST ANTHONY CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide policy guidance, technical assistance, and program oversight for the city of pittsburgh and allegheny county, and to assist in the economic development of southwestern pa region.
Mckees point development group, inc. was formed to organize, direct, and coordinate economic revitalization and redevelopment projects within the city of mckeesport(allegheny county), pennsylvania.
Community development resources
The pittsburgh metropolitan area hispanic chamber of commerce is the principal regional advocate for the hispanic business community's civic and economic interests. it is our mission to develop, promote, and advocate on behalf of hispanic…
Discover and preserve the historic resources throughout the city of williamsport, pa.
Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…
Provide the local leadership necessary to develop and implement a plan that will improve the economy, environmental and social-well being of the people through accelerated planning and development of the natural resources in eight…
The greater wyoming valley area ymca (gwva ymca) is a volunteer led public charity that includes men, women and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races and religions. our mission is to put christian principles into practice through…
Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.
The organization's purpose is to create flexible, rewarding, and meaningful volunteer opportunities in the pittsburgh region. pittsburgh cares partners with community based organizations to create the volunteer opportunities and recruits…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Victims and the most unlike its peers is Elizabeth Twp Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 188 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MCKEESPORT REGIONAL HISTORY & HERIT ↗
- Who funds Mckeesport Meals on Wheels Inc ↗
- Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CAMP SOLES INC ↗
- Who funds GROW PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH TWP HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MCKEESPORT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE INTERSECTION ↗
- Who funds WILMERDING COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR VICTIMS ↗
- Who funds THE 9TH STREET CLINIC ↗
- Who funds LAROSA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JAMIE'S DREAM TEAM ↗
- Who funds WAYPOINT YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GARDEN CLUB OF MCKEESPORT ↗
- Who funds ALLEGHENY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charles F Peters Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · McKeesport Hospital Foundation · Jefferson Regional Foundation · The Grable Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Upmc Group · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Allegheny Foundation · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization E R Crawford Est Trust Fund a Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to E R Crawford Est Trust Fund a Xxx-Xx-Xxxx?
Find your warmest path to E R Crawford Est Trust Fund a Xxx-Xx-Xxxx through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.