Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Texas · Public charity

Epd Inc

Employment of the disabled

$169k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
10
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 10
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
2
Total assets, FY2023
$29M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Epd Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202310$168k0%
FY202210$129k90%
FY20201$6kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Human Services$100kHealth$85kPhilanthropy$54kFood & Nutrition$39kEducation$25k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Guerrero Crystal Foundation$45,000224%
Pregnancy Help Center of Brazosport$40,00024%
Refuge for Women Inc$40,00021%
True to Life Ministries Inc$30,00023%
Salvation Army National Corp$30,0002n/a
United Way of Morgan County$29,50031%
Brazosport College Foundation$25,00021%
United Way of Brazoria County$24,00021%
Interfaith Food Bank Inc$19,50022%
Brazosport Cares$19,50021%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Epd Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGuerrero Crystal Foundation: $45,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetPregnancy Help Center of Brazosport: $40,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetRefuge for Women Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTrue to Life Ministries Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetUnited Way of Morgan County: $29,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetBrazosport College Foundation: $25,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetUnited Way of Brazoria County: $24,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetInterfaith Food Bank Inc: $19,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBrazosport Cares: $19,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dow Company FoundationTdecu Cares Foundatio…Community Foundation …Greater Houston Commu…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Dow Company FoundationMI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dow Company Foundation · Tdecu Cares Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Brazoria County · Greater Houston Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Epd Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Epd Inc?

Find your warmest path to Epd Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Epd Inc

How much does Epd Inc give?
Epd Inc reported 10 grants totaling $169,000 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 10 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Epd Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2023, its largest causes are Human Services (33%), Health (28%), Philanthropy (18%).
Who are Epd Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2023: Guerrero Crystal Foundation ($45k), Pregnancy Help Center of Brazosport ($40k), Refuge for Women Inc ($40k).
Does Epd Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Epd Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Dow Company Foundation, Tdecu Cares Foundation Inc, Community Foundation of Brazoria County.
Where is Epd Inc based?
Epd Inc is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $5k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Epd’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home