· Public charity
Epd Inc
Employment of the disabled
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE GUERRERO CRYSTAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| PREGNANCY HELP CENTER | $20,000 |
| REFUGE FOR WOMEN | $20,000 |
| TRUE TO LIFE MINISTRIES | $20,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $20,000 |
| BRAZOSPORT COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF BRAZORIA COUNTY | $12,000 |
| THE FOOD BASKET | $12,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF MORGAN COUNTY | $12,000 |
| BRAZOSPORT CARES | $12,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGUERRERO CRYSTAL FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $45k · revenue +76%
- PHPregnancy Help Center of Brazosport2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +20%
- TTTRUE TO LIFE MINISTRIES INC2× · 2022–2023 · $30k · revenue +18%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To engage the community and focus resources for those in need in comal county
Comprehensive service to domestic violence and sexual assault victims
The mission of the Bastrop County Emergency Food Pantry and Support Center is to serve Bastrop County residents going through periods of transition by providing emergency food assistance, education and support.
Promote hispanic business in brazoria county, texas by increasing opportunities, networking and providing access to resources.
The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…
To financially support charitable organizations in palo pinto county, tx, and surrounding areas through fundraising and incom from investments
Provide food for individuals in need
To assist homeless families in securing stable housing
The charitable purpose of the community foundation of brazoria county cfbc is to build permanent funds for the benefit of the community, to respond to change needs through effective grantmaking and to encourage philanthropy.
To feed our neighbors, teach self- sufficiency and grow healthy foods through innovative, collaborative approaches to ending hunger.
Collection of food to provide to needy people in brazos, county, texas
None
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brazosport Cares and the most unlike its peers is Pregnancy Help Center of Brazosport. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GUERRERO CRYSTAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Pregnancy Help Center of Brazosport ↗
- Who funds REFUGE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds TRUE TO LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF MORGAN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BRAZOSPORT COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds United Way of Brazoria County ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds BRAZOSPORT CARES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dow Company Foundation · Tdecu Cares Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Brazoria County · Greater Houston Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Epd Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Epd Inc?
Find your warmest path to Epd Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.