· Community foundation
Community Foundation of Brazoria County
The charitable purpose of the Community Foundation of Brazoria County cfbc is to build permanent funds for the benefit of the community, to respond to change needs through effective grantmaking and to encourage philanthropy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 22 grants below total $374,215 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $485,498 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $111,283 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $329k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| University Baptist Church | $38,750 |
| BACH | $38,200 |
| Our Lady Queen of Peace | $35,000 |
| Our Lady of Guadalupe | $30,500 |
| PGF Grant Fund | $21,137 |
| Brazoria Cnty Womens Center | $20,000 |
| Mountain on Masters Rd | $20,000 |
| Boy Scouts of America South T | $20,000 |
| Second Chance Network | $20,000 |
| Brazosport Rotary Club | $19,000 |
| Community Inclusion Program | $16,000 |
| Brazosport Cares Inc | $10,715 |
| Cal Farleys Boys Ranch | $10,000 |
| Theatre Under the Stars | $10,000 |
| Texas Baptist Men | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $254k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
41 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OLOur Lady Queen of Peace Catholic School Incorporated4× · 2018–2021 · $119k · revenue +18%
- BCBRAZOSPORT COLLEGE FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2024 · $106k · revenue +51%
- BCBRAZOSPORT CARES6× · 2018–2025 · $102k · revenue +689%
Funded once
- SASalvation Armyone grant, 2024 · $31k
- OFOLD FORT VELASCO HISTORICAL ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2021 · $26k
- HFHARVEST FOR THE HUNGRY INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $23k · revenue +266%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Comprehensive service to domestic violence and sexual assault victims
To educate, unite and focus our community's resources in order to efficiently address the most critical needs of Brazoria County
Provide veterinary and shelter services for displaced and wayward animals in the township and outlying area of port aransas, texas.
To provide community-centered prenatal care and health education to medically indigent pregnant women in the Brazos Valley. Comprehensive, accessible and affordable prenatal care and health education are the best ways to improve pregnancy…
To help individuals and families in need in Blanco County, Texas through a food pantry and snacks for food-insecure school children and emergency aid to families in the form of goods from the thrift store, linkages to other aid…
The mission of STARR of Hope, in collaboration with the community resources, is to provide prevention, intervention, and advocacy for women and children who experience domestic abuse or violence in Starr, Zapata and Jim Hogg Counties.
To provide quality services and products to the residents and businesses of our community in such a way as to maximize the affordability of safe and decent housing, especially for the low income; and to serve as a vehicle and assist in any…
The mission of the Baytown Resource & Assitance Center is to endeavor to relieve poverty and suffering by providing temporary relief to individuals or families in needy circumstances, and who reside in, or are passing through the Baytown,…
A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.
To protect and enhance the quality of life for abused and neglected children in Medina, Real and Uvalde Counties of Texas.
To develop and implement effective age-appropriate, consumer-driven, evidence-based services to prevent and reduce substance use and strengthen mental wellness across the southernmost Texas communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baps Charities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Military Moms and Wives of Brazoria County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Our Lady Queen of Peace Catholic School Incorporated ↗
- Who funds BRAZOSPORT COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRAZOSPORT CARES ↗
- Who funds ADULT READING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Brazoria County Dream Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Brazoria County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ↗
- Who funds THE ROSE ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNTAIN ON MASTERS ROAD ↗
- Who funds REFUGE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds Brazosport Rotary Club ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN F AUSTIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds TRUE TO LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation of Brazoria County ↗
- Who funds GULF COAST & SOUTHERN TEXAS ANIMAL RESCUE SERVICE ↗
- Who funds ACTIONS INC OF BRAZORIA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Forgotten Angels Inc ↗
- Who funds Whites Cottage Center ↗
- Who funds Brazosport Rotary Club Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Citizens For Animal Protection Inc ↗
- Who funds HARVEST FOR THE HUNGRY INC ↗
- Who funds LIVE OAK CLINIC OF BRAZOSPORT ↗
- Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Brazoria County · Shell USA Company Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · The Houston Food Bank · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Tdecu Cares Foundation Inc · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Ancient Free & Accepted Masons of Texas · Epd Inc · Baker Hughes Foundation · Celanese Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Foundation of Brazoria County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.