Skip to content

· Private foundation

Epaphroditus Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$464k
Granted FY2026still arriving
27
Grants FY2026still arriving
11
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Religion$1.4MHealth$745kInternational$551kYouth Development$485kEducation$322kFood & Nutrition$155kHuman Services$136kRecreation & Sports$131kOther$0
02FY2026 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k6 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $359k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$17,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEAM$80,000
BY THE HAND CLUB FOR KIDS$24,500
HOPE ACADEMY$22,000
Global Christian Forum Foundation$21,600
SAFE FAMILIES$19,500
COVENANT POINT BIBLE CAMP$19,500
Convenant Harbor Bible Camp$19,500
INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION$17,500
Lake Geneva Youth Camp$17,500
Bangladesh Youth First Concerns$17,500
Individual grant recipient$17,500
RECLAIMING HOPE$17,000
Individual grant recipient$17,000
North Park Theological Seminary$17,000
DAYSTAR US$17,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $303k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%Outreach Community Ministries Inc: $22k → 7%Outreach Community Ministries Inc: $22k → 7%Outreach Community Ministries Inc: $20k → 7%Outreach Community Ministries Inc: $20k → 7%Outreach Community Ministries Inc: $15k → 7%MERCY'S GATE: $3k → 9%Outreach Community Ministries Inc: $15k → 7%Outreach Community Ministries Inc: $15k → 7%Outreach Community Ministries Inc: $13k → 7%Outreach Community Ministries Inc: $12k → 7%Outreach Community Ministries Inc: $10k → 7%Lazarus House: $3k → 14%Lazarus House: $2k → 14%Lydia Home Association: $25k → 14%SAFE FAMILIES: $24k → 14%Lydia Home Association: $22k → 14%SAFE FAMILIES: $20k → 14%SAFE FAMILIES: $20k → 14%SAFE FAMILIES: $10k → 14%SAFE FAMILIES: $10k → 14%C247 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRIES: $3k → 14%C247 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRITES: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
IA
OH
CA
CO
MD
AZ
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 27% of Epaphroditus Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 46% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 32%.

Epaphroditus Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 42 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2026, 22 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
27

Total granted

$3.8M
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+18%

Still filing today

40%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    Global Christian Forum Foundation
    10× · 2017–2026 · $278k · revenue +193%
  • BT
    By The Hand Club For Kids
    10× · 2017–2026 · $249k · revenue +54%
  • BU
    BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $190k · revenue +207%

Funded once

  • UF
    Urban Farm Table Community Church
    one grant, 2025 · $15k
  • FB
    FUSION BIBLE CHURCH INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • QL
    QUESTSCOPE LTD
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Harvesters International Ministries

Partnering with Indigenous Leaders to Spread the Gospel, Serve Others, and Build Community

Religion
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
5
Pilgrim Africa

Pilgrim Africa's mission is to challenge despair, love boldly, and help African people create a future of sustainable prosperity and health. We give ourselves in service to others regardless of economic, religious, or social standing,…

International
6
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
7
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
8
Challenge Ministries Us

The organization exists to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ while providing support and serving the poor through benevolent assistance, medical services, education, orphan care, church planting, etc.

International
9
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
10
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
11
Empowering Lives International

Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…

Religion
12
World Orphans

World orphans vision is to empower the church to care for orphans and vulnerable families. we equip, inspire, and mobilize the church to care for orphans and vulnerable children. churches engaged. children restored. communities transformed…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Seraj Library Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
24/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEAM: $491,500 · OtherTEAMBy The Hand Club For Kids: $248,500 · OtherBy The Hand Club For KidsBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $190,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INCWorld Renew: $163,000 · OtherWorld RenewCOVENANT HARBOR BIBLE CAMP: $159,500 · OtherCOVENANT HARBOR BIBLE CAMPBangladesh Youth First Concerns: $157,881 · OtherBangladesh Youth First ConcernsCOVENANT POINT BIBLE CAMP: $143,500 · OtherLake Geneva Youth Camp: $140,000 · OtherLANGHAM PARTNERSHIP: $133,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $131,500 · OtherNorth Park Theological Seminary: $125,000 · OtherDreams Indeed international: $118,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE CHICAGO NORTHSIDE: $97,500 · Other+40 more: $620,400 · Other+40 moreOUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $163,000 · Human ServicesOUTREACH …SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $83,000 · Human ServicesSAFE FAMI…RESTORE INNOCENCE: $59,000 · Human ServicesRESTORE I…LYDIA HOME ASSOCIATION: $46,500 · Human ServicesLYDIA HOM…+3 more: $10,500 · Human ServicesGlobal Christian Forum Foundation: $277,600 · ReligionGlobal Ch…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $43,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN…+2 more: $6,500 · ReligionTHE SANTIAGO PARTNERSHIP: $118,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $36,000 · InternationalWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $30,000 · InternationalQUESTSCOPE LTD: $10,000 · InternationalMercy Corps: $10,000 · International+4 more: $15,000 · InternationalHOPE ACADEMY INC: $175,500 · Education+2 more: $8,000 · EducationFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $48,500 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $50,500 · Philanthropy
Other$2,919,781Human Services$362,000Religion$327,100International$219,000Education$183,500Youth Development$51,000Philanthropy$50,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGlobal Christian Forum Foundation: $277,600 over 10y, 14% of budgetBy The Hand Club For Kids: $248,500 over 10y, 0.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $190,000 over 10y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE ACADEMY INC: $175,500 over 10y, 0.2% of budgetOUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $163,000 over 10y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SANTIAGO PARTNERSHIP: $118,000 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $83,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetRESTORE INNOCENCE: $59,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $50,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $48,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDAYSTAR US INC: $47,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetLYDIA HOME ASSOCIATION: $46,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $43,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetQUESTSCOPE LTD: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNEHAHA ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBread for the World Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHe Intends Victory: $4,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetC24 7 FATHER'S ARMS MINISTRIES: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAZARUS HOUSE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVALOR CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPANZI FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAgape International Missions: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy's Gate: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALIGHT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION EURASIA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Global Christian Forum Foundation ↗
  • Who funds By The Hand Club For Kids ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE SANTIAGO PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds RESTORE INNOCENCE ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds DAYSTAR US INC ↗
  • Who funds LYDIA HOME ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
  • Who funds The Friendship Center ↗
  • Who funds SERAJ LIBRARY PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO18.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Nkc Family Foundation · Tyndale House Ministries · The Minneapolis Foundation · Barnabas Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Epaphroditus Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Epaphroditus Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Epaphroditus Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Epaphroditus Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Epaphroditus’ filings →

More from the funding graph