Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

EnvisionExcellence in STEM Education Inc

Envision's mission is to support excellence in science, technology, engineering and math (stem) education for all students, pk-20, nationwide, with an emphasis on underserved students in urban centers and rural communitites.

$205k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$205k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of ENVISION EXCELLENCE IN STEM EDUCATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$204,626
Median grant
1
States reached
$583k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cleveland Metropolitan School District$204,626
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Pear and Clover Inc: $35k → 8%CALIFORNIANS DEDICATED TO EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%SAMUELI ACADEMY: $55k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR EDUCATION POLICY AND LAW: $335k → 11%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS: $10k → 14%BUTTE OFFICE OF EDUCATION: $75k → 18%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $45k → 17%ARIA INTERNATIONAL: $24k → 16%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING FUND: $50k → 14%SUMMER SCIENCE PROGRAM: $25k → 8%DUKE INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE: $25k → 11%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $61k → 17%NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF NEW JERSEY INC: $70k → 4%DELRAN TOWNSHIP SCHOOLS: $20k → 7%CAMDEN COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 12%LIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER INC: $15k → 14%NEWARK THRIVES: $20k → 16%CHANNEL ZERO GROUP LLC: $8k → 15%THE PEAR INSTITUTE: $25k → 8%STEM NEXT OPPORTUNITY FUND: $50k → 11%CANCER SCHMANCER FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $25k → 17%ARIA INTERNATIONAL: $16k → 16%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING FUND: $25k → 14%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $45k → 17%STEM NEXT OPPORTUNITY FUND: $10k → 11%JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $5k → 17%POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $341k → 14%Cleveland Metropolitan School District: $205k → 17%REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES: $100k → 17%STEM EDUCATION COALITION: $75k → 14%CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: $199k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND: $35k → 17%CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: $100k → 17%CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: $35k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
NC
DC
LA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$780k · 4 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
26

Total granted

$780k
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+60%

Still filing today

75%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationHealthPhilanthropyScience & TechYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $106k · revenue +10%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING FUND
    2× · 2017–2019 · $75k · revenue +50%
  • SN
    STEM NEXT OPPORTUNITY FUND
    2× · 2017–2018 · $60k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • PS
    POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2019 · $341k · revenue -38%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGOgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $335k · revenue +60%
  • SF
    SAMUELI FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $203k · revenue ×60

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

3
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
4
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
7
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
8
San Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation

To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.

Education
9
San Jose State University Research Foundation

As an integral member of the san jose state university community, the san jose state university research foundation provides an entrepreneurial framework through which local, state and federal agencies, businesses and private foundations…

Education
10
Santa Fe Institute

The santa fe institute is a transdisciplinary research community that expands the boundaries of scientific understanding. its aim is to discover, comprehend, and communicate the common fundamental principles in complex physical,…

Science & Tech
11
Portland State University Foundation

Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.

12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ssp International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samueli Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%54%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,542

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
18/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT — $538,949 · OtherCLEVELAND METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICTPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL — $341,394 · OtherPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONALUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $335,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGOCHARITABLE VENTURES — $158,340 · OtherCHARITABLE VENTURESREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES — $100,000 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICESBUTTE OFFICE OF EDUCATION — $75,000 · Other+8 more — $162,243 · Other+8 moreCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $105,975 · EducationCLEVELAND STAT…STEM EDUCATION COALITION INC — $75,000 · EducationSTEM EDUCATION…STEM NEXT OPPORTUNITY FUND — $60,000 · EducationSTEM NEXT OPPO…SAMUELI ACADEMY — $55,000 · EducationSAMUELI ACADEM…SSP INTERNATIONAL INC — $25,000 · EducationSSP INTERNATIO…DUKE UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSIT…SAMUELI FOUNDATION — $203,107 · PhilanthropySAMUELI FO…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $35,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL…SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $5,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING FUND — $75,000 · Science & TechRESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF NEW JERSEY INC — $70,000 · Science & TechPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $45,000 · HealthNorthwestern Memorial HealthCare — $25,000 · HealthCANCER SCHMANCER FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthCalifornians Dedicated to Education Foundation — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $25,000 · InternationalLIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER — $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,710,926Education$345,975Philanthropy$253,107Science & Tech$145,000Health$95,000Youth Development$50,000International$25,000Arts & Culture$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL — $341,394 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $335,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $105,975 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSTEM EDUCATION COALITION INC — $75,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING FUND — $75,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetRESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF NEW JERSEY INC — $70,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSTEM NEXT OPPORTUNITY FUND — $60,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSAMUELI ACADEMY — $55,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCalifornians Dedicated to Education Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSSP INTERNATIONAL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNorthwestern Memorial HealthCare — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SCHMANCER FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetLIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMDEN COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William & Flora Hewlett FoundationCA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization EnvisionExcellence in STEM Education Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 14%
  • Liberty Science Center14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to EnvisionExcellence in STEM Education Inc?

Find your warmest path to EnvisionExcellence in STEM Education Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph