Skip to content

· Public charity

Enterprise Center of Johnson County

Designed to provide high quality value-added consulting services, administrative support, and low-cost flexible facilities for start-up and growth-oriented companies that will result in positive business activity and job creation in johnson county, kansas.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$1.9MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.8MHuman Services$930kEducation$414kCommunity Improvement$122kArts & Culture$100kFood & Nutrition$60kHousing & Shelter$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 20 grants below total $1,010,410, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,145,528 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $135,118 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $263k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $742k
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$901k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARKWOOD DAY SCHOOL LLC$125,000
SUNNY-STEPS CHILDCARE CENTER LLC$100,000
4 WILSONS ENTERPRISES LLC$100,000
RKS INSPIRE LLC$100,000
KIDZONE LEARNING CENTER OF OVERLAND$94,000
WOMEN'S BUSINESS CENTER$81,500
LITTLE LEARNERS EARLY CHILDHOOD$75,000
OLATHE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PRESCHOOL$66,000
GIOIOSA MONTESSORI LLC$47,000
VADAS CREATIVE WORLD$40,000
SPECIAL BEGINNINGS INC$30,000
DLH LLC$28,291
BRIGHT MINDS DAYCARE LLC$20,619
BISHOP MIEGE HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
CUBBY BEAR LEARNING CENTER LLC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LAKEVIEW VILLAGE INC: $13k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 222 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+197 more: $4,870,410 · Other+197 moreUNIVERSITY VENTURE PROGRAM - CROSSROADS INC: $249,500 · EducationTHE CULTURE HOUSE INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTRANSITION PLUS ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · Public Benefit
Other$4,870,410Education$249,500Arts & Culture$20,000Public Benefit$20,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CULTURE HOUSE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTRANSITION PLUS ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 1y, 79% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY VENTURE PROGRAM - CROSSROADS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CULTURE HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral AgenciesKS24.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 4 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies · Community Capital Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Enterprise Center of Johnson County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Enterprise Center of Johnson County. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 222 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Enterprise Center of Johnson County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph