· Public charity
Engenderhealth Inc
Engenderhealth envisions a gender-equal world where all people have the agency, resources, and opportunities to live healthy lives.(see schedule o)
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $4,560,974 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,623,027 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,062,053 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $181k
- $250k+3 grants · $4.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC | $3,014,828 |
| JSI RESEARCH AND TRAINING INSTITUTE INC | $755,965 |
| PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL | $566,176 |
| HUMENTUM INC | $94,237 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA | $86,602 |
| SOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS (SWB) | $14,986 |
| JOHN HOPKINS CENTER FOR COMMUNICATION PROGRAMS (CCP) (JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERS | $14,948 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC | $6,905 |
| YOUTH DEVELOPMENT LABS INC | $6,327 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $999k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $5.1M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH & RIGHTS
Stated purpose: SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH & RIGHTS
Stated purpose: SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH & RIGHTS
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IIINTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC5× · 2021–2025 · $13M · revenue -51%
- PIPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL5× · 2021–2025 · $3.5M · revenue -27%
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY5× · 2021–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +40%
Funded once
- HAHEAL AFRICA USAone grant, 2018 · $134k · revenue +19% · 43% of their budget
- WMWeill Medical College of Cornell Universone grant, 2017 · $106k
- CSCARDEA SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $98k · revenue +31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.
Pai advances evidence, policies and programs to enable women, youth and at-risk communities to access sexual and reproductive health as core to health equity, climate resilience, economic well-being and gender equality.
To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…
People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Engenderhealth envisions a gender-equal world where all people have the agency, resources, and opportunities to live healthy lives.(see schedule o)
See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.
Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.
To develop hiv prevention products and other sexual and reproductive health technologies for women, and to make them available and accessible where they are urgently needed.
Orcid provides an identifier for individuals to use with their name as they engage in research, scholarship, and innovation activities. we provide open tools that enable transparent and trustworthy connections between researchers, their…
Ipas works globally to advance reproductive justice by expanding access to abortion and contraception.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Trends Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHILD TRENDS INC ↗
- Who funds JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds HUMENTUM INC ↗
- Who funds HEAL AFRICA USA ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds CARDEA SERVICES ↗
- Who funds INTERNET SEXUALITY INFORMATION SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds SOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS ↗
- Who funds StoryCenter ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH DEVELOPMENT LABS INC ↗
- Who funds ACOG FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Johns Hopkins University · Family Health International Inc · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Engenderhealth Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc — 69% of income from government
- Child Trends Inc — 50% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.