Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Endless Hope Private Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$427k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$177k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Religion$3.8MEducation$1.2MHealth$197kHuman Services$129kInternational$49kArts & Culture$30kPhilanthropy$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $136k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST CONSTANTINE & HELEN CHURCH$176,581
ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX ARCHDIOCESE OF NORTH AMERICA$73,239
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$38,022
DIALEB USA INC$25,000
INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR ARTS$19,904
INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$11,958
TACKLE TOMORROW$10,704
GAN MENACHEM PRE SCHOOL$10,000
CHILDRENS NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE SUCCESS FOUNDATION$10,000
THE PARTNERSHIP TO END HOMELESSNESS$5,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH$5,000
AL-ZAYTOONAH UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN$4,891
Individual grant recipient$4,228
INTERNATIONAL ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC$4,024
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%WOMEN IN NEED OF GENEROUS SUPPORT: $3k → 14%OURCALLING INC: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.1M · 24 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
64

Total granted

$4.1M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+66%

Still filing today

25%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $352k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK
    4× · 2019–2023 · $85k · revenue +21%
  • CS
    College Success Foundation - District of Columbia
    3× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +19%
  • UF
    UNTHSC FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $38k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SAINT CONSTANTINE SCHOOL OF HOUSTON
    one grant, 2023 · $307k
  • SC
    STS CONSTANTINE & HELEN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $159k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $104k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
4
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
7
El Paso Children's Hospital Corporation

To provide compassionate, coordinated, family-centered care for children with a dedicated commitment to excellent patient outcomes, inclusive leadership and innovative pediatric research and education.

Health
8
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
9
Nuvance Health

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
10
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Epworth Children & Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Corks for Kids Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community College Foundatio…Community FoundationsElementary Literacy TutoringChristian Missionary Organi…Food Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsChristian Youth Camps
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%3%<5yr16%10%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr10%24%35–55yr13%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%2%5–10yr20%36%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr10%21%35–55yr13%35%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/33
the rest of the field
15%
20,232/136,771

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

STS CONSTANTINE & HELEN ORTHODOX CHURCH — $3,148,742 · OtherSTS CONSTANTINE & HELEN ORTHODOX CHURCHTHE SAINT CONSTANTINE SCHOOL OF HOUSTON — $307,485 · OtherTHE SAINT CONSTANTINE SCHOOL OF HOUSTONIndividual grant recipient — $248,222 · Other+85 more — $1,689,935 · Other+85 moreCollege Success Foundation - District of Columbia — $45,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $38,022 · EducationUNTHSC FOUNDATION — $37,929 · EducationCollege Success Foundation — $20,000 · EducationTackle Tomorrow — $10,704 · Education+3 more — $7,969 · EducationACT FOR LEBANON CO FMFSB LLC — $20,000 · InternationalINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC — $4,024 · InternationalFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $2,650 · InternationalINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $25,904 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $10,000 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $1,750 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC — $1,000 · HealthYOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT — $5,000 · Human ServicesOURCALLING INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesASCEND DALLAS — $2,500 · Human ServicesTHE PARTNERSHIP TO END HOMELESSNESS INC — $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$5,394,384Education$159,624International$26,674Arts & Culture$25,904Health$12,750Human Services$10,500Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $85,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEPWORTH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $69,300 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCollege Success Foundation - District of Columbia — $45,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $38,022 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNTHSC FOUNDATION — $37,929 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $25,904 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCollege Success Foundation — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetACT FOR LEBANON CO FMFSB LLC — $20,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTackle Tomorrow — $10,704 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARTNERSHIP TO END HOMELESSNESS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC — $4,024 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCMURRY UNIVERSITY — $3,969 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthshore Food Bank — $3,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBONTON ENTERPRISES — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOURCALLING INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $2,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASCEND DALLAS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMI ESCUELITA PRESCHOOL INC — $1,493 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS MIDWEST — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAD CAMP INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCorks for Kids Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK
  • Who funds EPWORTH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds College Success Foundation - District of Columbia
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds UNTHSC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS
  • Who funds College Success Foundation
  • Who funds ACT FOR LEBANON CO FMFSB LLC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationTX12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Tides Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Endless Hope Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Endless Hope Private Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Endless Hope Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph