Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Enact Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$488k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$147k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Housing & Shelter$511kPhilanthropy$437kHuman Services$285kFood & Nutrition$217kYouth Development$35kInternational$33kEducation$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $297k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Blackbaud Giving Fund$147,370
Habitat for Humanity International$50,000
Homefree USA$50,000
Food Bank of Central & Eastern NC$50,000
CASA$35,000
REBUILDING TOGETHER OF THE TRIANGLE$15,000
The Center for Volunteer Giving$15,000
Resources for Seniors$15,000
Note in the Pocket$15,000
Meals on Wheels for Wake County$15,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE Charities of the Triangle$10,000
The Family Violence Prevention Center Inc$10,000
THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT INC$7,500
COLORADO HOMEOWNERSHIP COALITION$7,500
CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY IN ACTION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $155k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%American National Red Cross: $5k → 14%Learning Together: $10k → 8%Learning Together: $5k → 8%Learning Together: $5k → 8%Women's Center of Wake County: $10k → 8%Women's Center of Wake County: $5k → 8%Note in the Pocket: $15k → 8%Note in the Pocket: $15k → 8%Note in the Pocket: $15k → 8%The Center for Volunteer Caregiving: $20k → 8%The Center for Volunteer Giving: $15k → 8%The Center for Volunteer Caregiving: $10k → 8%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY IN ACTION: $5k → 8%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT INC: $8k → 8%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT INC: $8k → 8%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT INC: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 19 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +8% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
-7%

Still filing today

84%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterInternationalPhilanthropyFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WAKE COUNTY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $185k · revenue +8%
  • FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $170k · revenue +6%
  • CASA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $65k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -7%
  • AG
    ACTIVATE GOOD INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -8%
  • MB
    Mortgage Bankers Association
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise of Wake County Inc

Moving families at risk of or experiencing homelessness into sustainable, permanent housing in our community through a continuum of support services.

Housing & Shelter
2
Wake County Continuum of Care Dba Raleigh-Wake Partnership to End and Prev

Our mission is to leverage the power of community to address systemic causes of homelessness through coordinated response, education, data, and advocacy.

Housing & Shelter
3
Raleigh County Community Action Association Inc

Raleigh county community action association, inc. empowers individuals and families to reach their highest levels of social and economical self-sufficiency, while identifying and eliminating causes of poverty. rccaa provides direct…

Human Services
4
Homes of Hope Inc

Provied temporary and emergency and low income housing and secured shelter.

Housing & Shelter
5
Passage Home Inc

To break the cycle of poverty and create multi-generational self-sufficiency for the individuals and families of wake county by helping them achieve housing and income security.

Housing & Shelter
6
Habitat for Humanity of Nc Inc

Seeking to put Gods love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Habitat for Humanity of North Carolina…

Housing & Shelter
7
Hospice of Gaston County Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

8
Housing for New Hope

To end homelessness one valuable person at a time

Housing & Shelter
9
Care Share Health Alliance Inc

Care share health alliance is a north carolina-based nonprofit organization advancing community health and wellbeing through systems change. guided by the mission of collaborating for health and a vision of communities that are healthy and…

Health
10
WakeMed

The mission of wakemed is to improve the health and well-being of our community with outstanding and compassionate care to all.

Health
11
Hospice of Wake County Inc

To care for individuals and families with compassion, support, and expertise as they navigate the end of life or life-changing illness.

12
Durham Home Inc

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oak City Cares Inc and the most unlike its peers is Americares Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number29%0%<5yr19%8%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr14%27%20–35yr9%35%35–55yr9%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value29%0%<5yr19%1%5–10yr20%33%10–20yr14%26%20–35yr9%38%35–55yr9%3%55yr+

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
18%
2,370/13,292

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
15/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND — $436,838 · PhilanthropyTHE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUNDHOMEFREE USA INC — $200,000 · PhilanthropyHOMEFREE USA INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $185,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WAKE CO…RESOURCES FOR SENIORS INC — $55,000 · OtherRESOURCES FOR SENIORS INCMEALS ON WHEELS OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $46,500 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF WAKE COUNTY …RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE TRIANGLE — $40,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES…THE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC — $35,000 · OtherTHE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION …Junior Achievement of Eastern NC Inc — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · Other+6 more — $28,500 · Other+6 moreFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $170,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF…NOTE IN THE POCKET INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesNOTE IN THE…THE CENTER FOR VOLUNTEER CAREGIVING — $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER …THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT — $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE GREEN C…LEARNING TOGETHER INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesLEARNING TO…WOMENS CENTER OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS CENT…+2 more — $10,000 · Human Services+2 moreCASA — $65,000 · Housing & ShelterPRESERVING HOME INC — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterCOLORADO HOMEOWNERSHIP COALITION — $7,500 · Housing & ShelterOAK CITY CARES INC — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC — $22,500 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · InternationalBOYS CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $25,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$636,838Other$430,000Food & Nutrition$170,000Human Services$155,000Housing & Shelter$117,500International$32,500Youth Development$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND — $436,838 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEFREE USA INC — $200,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $185,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $170,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASA — $65,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRESOURCES FOR SENIORS INC — $55,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $46,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNOTE IN THE POCKET INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VOLUNTEER CAREGIVING — $45,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetPRESERVING HOME INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE TRIANGLE — $40,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC — $35,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC — $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT — $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLEARNING TOGETHER INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWOMENS CENTER OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTIVATE GOOD INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIANGLE FAMILY SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOAK CITY CARES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC39× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · W Trent Ragland Jr Foundation · Aj Fletcher Foundation · Duke University Health System Inc · Bell Schaefer Family Foundation · Carolinas Credit Union Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Bell Cook Family Foundation · Bell Koonce Burnette Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Enact Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 54%
  • Homefree Usa Inc54% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Enact Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Enact Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph