Skip to content

· Private foundation

Emy & Emil Herzfeld Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$111k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$180kHealth$110kPhilanthropy$89kCrime & Legal$84kArts & Culture$71kYouth Development$64kHousing & Shelter$60kEducation$58kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $85k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mazzoni Center$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Health Career Connection$10,000
West Park Cultural Center$10,000
Mercy Center$10,000
Police Athletic League of Philadelp$10,000
Avenues for Justice$10,000
Beyond Literacy$10,000
Project Home$7,500
The Attic Youth Center$7,000
Women Against Abuse$6,000
Hudson Guild$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Project Home: $8k → 22%Project Home: $8k → 22%Hudson Guild: $5k → 17%Hudson Guild: $5k → 17%Hudson Guild: $5k → 17%Hudson Guild: $5k → 17%Hudson Guild: $5k → 17%Hudson Guild: $3k → 17%Hudson Guild: $3k → 17%Arc of Philadelphia: $7k → 22%Arc of Philadelphia: $7k → 22%Arc of Philadelphia: $5k → 22%Urban Resource Institute: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$775k · 23 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
5

Total granted

$775k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+9%

Still filing today

74%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    Mercy Center Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $91k · revenue +131%
  • WP
    WEST PARK CULTURAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $61k · revenue +88%
  • AF
    AVENUES FOR JUSTICE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • WP
    WOAR PHILADELPHIA CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL VIOLENCE
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +9%
  • UR
    URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +70%
  • T
    TransNewYork
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue -41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York City Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project

The new york city gay and lesbian anti-violence project (avp) mission is to empower lgbtq and hiv-affected communities and allies to end all forms of violence through organizing and education, and support survivors through counseling and…

—
2
Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc

EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…

Human Services
3
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services Inc

Cases' mission is to increase public safety through innovative services that reduce crime and incarceration, improve behavioral health, promote recovery and rehabilitation, and create opportunities for success in the community. we believe…

—
4
New York City Alliance Against Sexual Assault Inc

The alliance leads new york citys mission to end sexual violence through education, prevention programming, research, and policy change. until we end sexual violence in all forms, we will be here for all survivors and the organizations…

Human Services
5
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
6
Urban Affairs Coalition

Driving change from the ground up, the urban affairs coalition (uac) unites government, business, neighborhoods, and individual initiatives to improve the quality of life in the region, build wealth in urban communities, and solve emerging…

—
7
Women Against Abuse Legal Center

The women against abuse legal center provides free attorney representation, advocacy and telephone counseling to victims of domestic violence seeking legal protections in philadelphia.

Crime & Legal
8
Argus Community Inc

Argus community's mission is to provide innovative programs which help severely disadvantaged teens and adults to free themselves from poverty and drug abuse and build new lives based on responsibility, work, and hope. argus provides a…

Health
9
Aids Service Center of Lower Manhattan Inc

Aids service center of lower manhattan, inc., d/b/a alliance for positive change ("alliance") is a not-for-profit community organization founded in 1990 with a central mission of helping low-income new yorkers living with hiv and other…

Health
10
The Osborne Association Inc

The association's purpose is to provide services to defendants, incarcerated people, formerly incarcerated people and their families: to provide alternatives to incarceration; to provide job training and job placement; to provide reentry…

—
11
Womens Resource Center of Newport and Bristol Counties

The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.

Human Services
12
Nysarc Inc New York City Chapter

We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Prison Association and Home; the most unlike its peers is West Park Cultural Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBeyond Literacy: $58,000 · OtherBeyond LiteracyPolice Athletic League of Philadelp: $51,000 · OtherPolice Athletic League of PhiladelpWOMEN'S PRISON ASSOCIATION AND HOME: $24,000 · OtherWOMEN'S PRISON ASSOCIATION AND HOMEMAZZONI CENTER: $22,500 · OtherMAZZONI CENTERLittle Sisters of the Assumption: $17,000 · OtherThe Carter Burden Center for the Ag: $14,000 · OtherALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $39,000 · OtherALI FORNEY CENTER INC+7 more: $48,250 · Other+7 moreWOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC: $31,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN AGAINST …HUDSON GUILDINC: $31,000 · Human ServicesHUDSON GUILDIN…The Arc Of Philadelphia: $19,000 · Human ServicesThe Arc Of Phi…PROJECT HOME: $15,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOMEURBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $6,000 · Human ServicesURBAN RESOURCE…Mercy Center Inc: $91,000 · Recreation & SportsMercy Center…HEALTH CAREER CONNECTION INC: $36,000 · HealthHEALTH CA…NATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC: $26,000 · HealthNATIONAL …WOAR PHILADELPHIA CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $6,000 · HealthWOAR PHIL…THE ATTIC YOUTH CENTER: $51,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE ATTIC…POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $13,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOLICE AT…WEST PARK CULTURAL CENTER: $61,000 · EnvironmentAVENUES FOR JUSTICE INC: $60,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$348,750Human Services$102,000Recreation & Sports$91,000Health$68,000Youth Development$64,000Environment$61,000Crime & Legal$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMercy Center Inc: $91,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetWEST PARK CULTURAL CENTER: $61,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetAVENUES FOR JUSTICE INC: $60,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBeyond Literacy: $58,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ATTIC YOUTH CENTER: $51,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $39,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH CAREER CONNECTION INC: $36,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC: $31,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHUDSON GUILDINC: $31,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC: $26,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN'S PRISON ASSOCIATION AND HOME: $24,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAZZONI CENTER: $22,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Arc Of Philadelphia: $19,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ORLEANS MUSICIANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVISITING NEIGHBORS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetWOAR PHILADELPHIA CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetURBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTransNewYork: $4,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mercy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds WEST PARK CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AVENUES FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Beyond Literacy ↗
  • Who funds THE ATTIC YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH CAREER CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON GUILDINC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S PRISON ASSOCIATION AND HOME ↗
  • Who funds MAZZONI CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Arc Of Philadelphia ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ORLEANS MUSICIANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VISITING NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOAR PHILADELPHIA CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TransNewYork ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The William Penn Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Emy & Emil Herzfeld Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Emy & Emil Herzfeld Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Emy & Emil Herzfeld Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Emy & Emil Herzfeld Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Emy & Emil Herzfeld’s filings →

    More from the funding graph