Skip to content

· Private foundation

Emme Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$165k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$176kHousing & Shelter$172kEducation$165kYouth Development$98kFood & Nutrition$31kReligion$20kHealth$14kEmployment$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cloud Covered Streets$25,000
SIU Foundation$20,000
Boys and Girls Club of So Illinois$20,000
Families Helping Families$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Phoenix Rescue Mission$10,000
St Marys Food Bank$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Shepherds Gate$10,000
U Mom New Day Center$10,000
Strong Families Project Hope$10,000
Victory Dream Center$5,000
Planned Parenthood$5,000
Midwest Mission$2,590
Altzheimers Association$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Cloud Covered Streets: $25k → 11%Cloud Covered Streets: $10k → 11%Cloud Covered Streets: $8k → 11%Cloud Covered Streets: $8k → 11%Hope Link: $1k → 9%Cloud Covered Streets: $5k → 11%Hopelink: $5k → 9%Hopelink: $2k → 9%Loaves and Fishes: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
CA
MO
AZ
KS
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$638k · 18 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
26

Total granted

$638k
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+10%

Still filing today

44%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SG
    Shepherds Gate
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +11%
  • CC
    CLOUD COVERED STREETS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $55k · revenue +38%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE
    4× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • YO
    YWCA of Metropolitan ChicagoProject Help
    one grant, 2021 · $19k
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of SIllinois
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • YO
    YMCA of Metro ChicagoProject Help
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
3
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
6
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
7
Lutheran Social Services of the Southwest

We stabilize people during crisis and transition, build a foundation where people can thrive, and preserve dignity and respect for the most vulnerable.

Religion
8
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
9
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
10
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

—
11
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phoenix Gospel Mission; the most unlike its peers is Pat Mac's Pack Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SIU Foundation: $149,555 · OtherSIU FoundationFamilies Helping Families: $94,000 · OtherFamilies Helping FamiliesBoys and Girls Club of So Illinois: $52,500 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of So IllinoisIndividual grant recipient: $27,500 · OtherStrong Families Project Hope: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · OtherYWCA of Metropolitan ChicagoProject Help: $19,000 · Other+32 more: $133,640 · Other+32 moreShepherds Gate: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterShepherds GateUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterUMOM NEW DAY CE…CLOUD COVERED STREETS: $55,000 · Human ServicesCLOUD COV…HOPELINK: $8,079 · Human ServicesHOPELINK+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOI: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $25,500 · Food & NutritionCOMP-U-DOPT INC: $15,000 · Education+1 more: $250 · EducationPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $10,000 · ReligionFAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX: $5,000 · Religion
Other$522,195Housing & Shelter$105,000Human Services$65,079Youth Development$32,500Food & Nutrition$25,500Education$15,250Religion$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetShepherds Gate: $60,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCLOUD COVERED STREETS: $55,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC: $45,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOI: $30,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $25,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMP-U-DOPT INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFARESTART: $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPELINK: $8,079 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GELT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAcres of Diamonds: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPat Mac's Pack Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Shepherds Gate ↗
  • Who funds CLOUD COVERED STREETS ↗
  • Who funds UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOI ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds COMP-U-DOPT INC ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds FARESTART ↗
  • Who funds HOPELINK ↗
  • Who funds THE GELT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Acres of Diamonds ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Emme Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Emme Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Emme Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph