Skip to content

· Private foundation

Emily Anne Weikert Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$206kHealth$123kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kHuman Services$95kYouth Development$83kAnimals$65kCrime & Legal$25kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Children's Tumor Foundation$20,000
WDMCS Student Scholarship Fund$17,500
EveryStep Foundation$15,000
AHeinz57$10,000
West Des Moines Police Department$10,000
WDMCS Student Scholarship Fund$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The FreeStore: $5k → 5%Free Store: $5k → 10%Free Store: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of Emily Anne Weikert Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in IA; by stated purpose, 72%.

Emily Anne Weikert Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$534k · 11 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$534k
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-5%

Still filing today

55%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +10%
  • FF
    FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE
    4× · 2019–2023 · $45k · revenue +17%
  • VT
    VARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF IOWA
    5× · 2017–2021 · $45k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $28k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • SA
    Shine A Light NF Walk Iowa
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Free Will Baptist Childrens Ho

Mission is to provide a loving christian home to children who are in need of care and may be hurting because of the circumstances of life

Human Services
2
Lifeline Child and Family Services

Foster care and adoption. place troubled and neglected youth into foster family homes and coordinate of troubled and neglected youth.

Human Services
3
Children to Love International

Children to love is focused on meeting the needs of the suffering children of the world, providing help and assistance to empower 'the least of these'(matthew 25:40). through education, spiritual teaching, economic support, physical…

International
4
Youth and Family Resource Center Inc

To provide shelter and outreach services for children.

Human Services
5
Covenant Children's Home Inc

Covenant childrens home is to provide a residence, food and clothing plus a continuum of care including physical, emotional, and spiritual nurturing for neglected, abandoned or abused children.

Human Services
6
The Refuge a Religious Association

Christian outreach and resource center serving individuals with substance use disorder.

Religion
7
Variety-the Childrens Charity of the United States

Act as the national cooperative for all variety chapters in the united states through a regional network of tents and representatives. it shall help coordinate resources, develop programs and cooperative fundraising strategies.…

Philanthropy
8
Helping Kids to Recover Inc

Please see schedule O

Health
9
Children's Cancer Family Foundation of Ne Wi Inc

Raise money to support families and children suffering from childhood cancer.

Health
10
New Pathways for Children Inc

Children's residential services

Human Services
11
Children 1ST Community Development

Placing minor children in appropriate foster homes and providing clothing, educational assistance, and other needs of displaced children.

Youth Development
12
New Road Missions

We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildwood Hills Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project 52 Inc Clark. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

West Des Moines Police Dept: $110,000 · OtherWest Des Moines Police DeptWDMCS Student Scholarship Fund: $101,250 · OtherWDMCS Student Scholarship FundEveryStep Foundation: $65,000 · OtherEveryStep FoundationWDMCS Student Scholorship Fund: $52,500 · OtherWDMCS Student Scholorship FundVARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF IOWA: $45,000 · OtherVARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF IOWAIndividual grant recipient: $27,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherShine A Light NF Walk Iowa: $20,000 · Other+9 more: $97,500 · Other+9 moreCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S …ELLIPSIS INC: $18,000 · HealthELLIPSIS IN…+1 more: $2,000 · HealthFURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $45,000 · AnimalsFREESTORE: $15,000 · Human ServicesWILDWOOD HILLS INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$568,750Health$70,000Animals$45,000Human Services$15,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFURRY FRIENDS REFUGE: $45,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetVARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF IOWA: $45,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetELLIPSIS INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBLUEPRINT FOR LIFE INC: $17,500 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetFREESTORE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWILDWOOD HILLS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPROJECT 52 INC CLARK: $2,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FURRY FRIENDS REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds VARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds ELLIPSIS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUEPRINT FOR LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds FREESTORE ↗
  • Who funds WILDWOOD HILLS INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT 52 INC CLARK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gabus FoundationIA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gabus Foundation · Kyle J & Sharon Krause Family Foundation · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Emily Anne Weikert Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Emily Anne Weikert Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Emily Anne Weikert’s filings →

    More from the funding graph