Skip to content
Emil & Ruth Green Fdn-Jmg at a glance

· Private foundation

Emil & Ruth Green Fdn-Jmg

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$135kEducation$43kYouth Development$14kReligion$14kInternational$11kRecreation & Sports$8kPhilanthropy$8kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$895k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$10,000
FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION$6,500
EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER$2,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,000
INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS$2,000
TEMPLE EMANU-EL OF CLOSTER$2,000
ALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INC$2,000
PLAY FOR P I N K INC$1,500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,500
FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS$1,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COACHELLA VALLEY$1,500
JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY$1,500
ASPCA$1,000
CROHNS AND COLITIS FOUNDATION$1,000
DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
NJ
CA
MD
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$199k · 22 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
16

Total granted

$199k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+41%

Still filing today

73%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $68k · revenue +99%
  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $31k · revenue +117%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $12k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • MM
    MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +41%
  • VS
    Visions Services for the Blind
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
2
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
5
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
6
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health
7
Isabella Geriatric Center Inc

Operating as isabella center for rehabilitation and nursing care, isabella is a 705-bed not-for-profit organization that is a member of the mjhs health system family. isabella is committed to providing exceptional short-term, sub-acute…

Human Services
8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
Beth Israel Medical Center

Since its founding, over 120 years ago, as a medical dispensary to meet the needs of the impoverished and underserved jewish community of the lower east side, beth israel medical center has been committed to the care of persons of all…

Health
10
The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research

The feinstein institute for medical research ("the institute") is the research branch of northwell health ("northwell"). through its affiliation with northwell, the institute's mission is to bridge the gap between biomedical research and…

Health
11
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
12
American College of Radiology Foundation

The mission of the acr foundation is to advance the profession and practice of radiology to benefit patients with a specific emphasis on health policy research.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montefiore Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
26/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $67,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCEisenhower Medical Center: $10,300 · HealthEisenhower Medical CenterMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 · HealthMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTERSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $8,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INCJEWISH HOME AND REHABILITATION CENTER: $5,500 · Health+4 more: $8,000 · Health+4 moreFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $31,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUND…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $12,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNE…+2 more: $2,250 · EducationTEMPLE EMANU-EL OF CLOSTER INC: $7,500 · OtherTEMPLE EMANU-EL OF CLOS…INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $5,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHI…ALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INC: $4,000 · OtherALS UNITED GREATER NEW …Womens Metropolitan Golf Asso Fdn: $4,000 · OtherWomens Metropolitan Gol…INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS &: $3,500 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHI…Visions Services for the Blind: $3,000 · OtherVisions Services for th…Temple Beth El Of Northern Valley: $2,500 · OtherCLOSTER VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE & RESCUE CORPS INC: $2,000 · OtherDR KENNY ENCOURAGEMENT FUND: $2,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $3,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAG…Mercy Ships International: $3,000 · OtherMercy Ships Internation…+11 more: $11,500 · Other+11 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,500 · PhilanthropyNORTHERN CALIFORNIA PGA FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyPLAY FOR PINK INC: $7,000 · Crime & LegalTHE SEEING EYE INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH HOME FOUNDATION OF NORTH JERSEY: $1,500 · Human Services
Health$116,300Education$45,250Other$51,000Youth Development$12,000Philanthropy$7,500Crime & Legal$7,000Human Services$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $67,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $31,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $10,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLOSTER VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE & RESCUE CORPS INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH RENEWAL FUND: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAtlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA PGA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S METROPOLITAN GOLF ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIO INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA7.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Emil & Ruth Green Fdn-Jmg funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Emil & Ruth Green Fdn-Jmg. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Emil & Ruth Green Fdn-Jmg’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home