Skip to content

· Private foundation

Emanuel & Anna Weinstein Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Civil Rights$2.5MHuman Services$55kFood & Nutrition$11kHealth$11kInternational$10kEnvironment$10kEducation$9kCrime & Legal$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$398k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NEW JEWISH HOME$4,000
WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION$2,500
WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION$2,500
SHORERIVERS$2,000
JEWISH WOMEN INTERNATIONAL$1,800
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,500
SHORERIVERS$1,000
NEIGHBORHOOD COALITION FOR SHELTER$1,000
TENEMENT MUSEUM$1,000
CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE FEEDING PROGRAM$1,000
WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%NO MORE FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
OR
IA
MO
MD
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

5%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$123k · 22 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
13

Total granted

$123k
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+38%

Still filing today

50%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SHORERIVERS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $8k · revenue +11%
  • NC
    NEIGHBORHOOD COALITION FOR SHELTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +65%
  • HI
    HIAS INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $4k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • VW
    VARIOUS WEINSTEIN FOUNDATIONS
    one grant, 2019 · $2.5M
  • TN
    THE NO MORE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +143%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
2
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
3
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
4
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
5
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…

Arts & Culture
6
Women's Foodservice Forum

Accelerate the advancement of women leaders in the food industry. we believe in limitless opportunity for all women.

Food & Nutrition
7
Womens Funding Network

Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.

Education
8
Women First Inc

Women first invests in grassroots initiatives driven by women and girls in developing economies that sustainably advance their lives.

International
9
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
10
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
11
Women Donors Network Action

To channel collective power and resources in solidarity with movements to advance the organization's vision of creating a just and sustainable world where everyone can safely and freely determine their own futures.

—
12
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Funders Network; the most unlike its peers is The Maryland Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS WEINSTEIN FOUNDATIONS: $2,529,744 · OtherVARIOUS WEINSTEIN FOUNDATIONS+22 more: $81,710 · OtherWASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $22,250 · Human ServicesTHE NO MORE FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Human ServicesSHORERIVERS INC: $8,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentSAWTOOTH SOCIETY INC: $500 · EnvironmentHIAS INC: $3,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 · InternationalNEIGHBORHOOD COALITION FOR SHELTER INC: $5,500 · Housing & ShelterEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $3,000 · Civil RightsCASA OF TALBOT COUNTY INC: $2,500 · Civil RightsLOWER EAST SIDE TENEMENT MUSEUM: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,611,454Human Services$24,750Environment$9,500International$8,000Housing & Shelter$5,500Civil Rights$5,500Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $22,250 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSHORERIVERS INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD COALITION FOR SHELTER INC: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Women International: $3,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIAS INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NO MORE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCASA OF TALBOT COUNTY INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOWER EAST SIDE TENEMENT MUSEUM: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $1,210 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBRIDGE MAIN STREET INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAWTOOTH SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHORERIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD COALITION FOR SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Women International ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE NO MORE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF TALBOT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LOWER EAST SIDE TENEMENT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE MAIN STREET INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAWTOOTH SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Emanuel & Anna Weinstein Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Emanuel & Anna Weinstein Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 33%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • The No More Foundation: 33% of income from government
  • Shorerivers Inc: 13% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Emanuel & Anna Weinstein Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Emanuel & Anna Weinstein Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Emanuel & Anna Weinstein’s filings →

More from the funding graph